On 18.06.2006 03:51 CE(S)T, Loren Wilton wrote: > The rule you suggest isn't particularly good. There are far too many legit > mails (mostly mailing list type of things) that do exactly what you want to > check for. So the FP rate is higher than most people would like.
However, I haven't seen this type of link before and I cannot tolerate people showing explicit URLs in a link label but actually linking somewhere else. This rule, as so many, isn't intended to block a message on its own, but gives its part to the score. > That said, I believe there is at least one SARE rule that checks for exactly > what you want to look for. Now that I know what SARE is, it doesn't make the impression of a considerable archive to me, with respect to this issue. Still I don't know how to create a rule like this. But as someone else in the bug tracker already mentioned a year ago, what SpamAssassin misses to do things like that is a 'rawbody' match that uses the entire message, not only single lines. Content can be arbitrary split over many lines so that any 'rawbody' rule can become useless pretty fast. :( -- Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://beta.unclassified.de – My web laboratory.
