John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 09:03, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for people to try this out and for people who want to
participate in this new project. These lists do block spam, but more
importantly that are used to actively detect nonspam and reduce false
positiv
On Saturday 22 July 2006 09:03, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Looking for people to try this out and for people who want to
> participate in this new project. These lists do block spam, but more
> importantly that are used to actively detect nonspam and reduce false
> positives. Here's the details. I'm look
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, July 22, 2006 15:46, Loren Wilton wrote:
From: "test"
Subject: Your PayPal account has been temporarily limited due to
Unauthorized Access.
Hum, yes. I'm sure I'd expect that message from "test".
maybe test.com testing that spf does not
From: "Kjetil Kjernsmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello again!
Sorry to follow up on myself, I guess it was a bad idea to post such a
long message, and at the end say that I was going on vacation. I'm back
now, and the problem has by no means disappeared. I would be very
grateful if someone could hav
Hello again!
Sorry to follow up on myself, I guess it was a bad idea to post such a
long message, and at the end say that I was going on vacation. I'm back
now, and the problem has by no means disappeared. I would be very
grateful if someone could have a look. I'll try to summarize, the
previo
On Sat, July 22, 2006 15:46, Loren Wilton wrote:
> From: "test"
> Subject: Your PayPal account has been temporarily limited due to
> Unauthorized Access.
>
> Hum, yes. I'm sure I'd expect that message from "test".
maybe test.com testing that spf does not work in sa 3.1.3 ?
atleast not in my comp
Looking for people to try this out and for people who want to
participate in this new project. These lists do block spam, but more
importantly that are used to actively detect nonspam and reduce false
positives. Here's the details. I'm looking for some partners to help
feed data into the system
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 02:32:52PM +0100, Obantec Support wrote:
> All seems to be running ok but sa-update put the latest .cf files in
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001003/updates_spamassassin_org
> not
> /etc/mail/spamassassin
Yes.
> do i need to force sa-update to use the above with sa-update --up
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Well, yeah, but does that prevent them from defining
> > "postmaster" and "abuse" aliases?
>
> You could also do them a favor and sign them up for the rfc-ign
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, jdow wrote:
> > Well, yeah, but does that prevent them from defining "postmaster" and
> > "abuse" aliases?
>
> I suppose you sent a suitably scathing note to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> their listed technical contact, didn't you?
Not yet.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746
From: "test"
Subject: Your PayPal account has been temporarily limited due to
Unauthorized Access.
Hum, yes. I'm sure I'd expect that message from "test".
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error
> From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >* Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> i was being over curious so if 3.1.0 failed i could drop
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i was being over curious so if 3.1.0 failed i could drop back to 3.0.0
That makes sense.
guess i need to rebuild using default /usr/bin
No, you need to fix the startup script to call the NEW version
I b
From: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> i have just built 3.1.0 using
> perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
> make
> make install
THis installs to /usr/local/bin/...
> trying to use the start-u
* Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i was being over curious so if 3.1.0 failed i could drop back to 3.0.0
That makes sense.
> guess i need to rebuild using default /usr/bin
No, you need to fix the startup script to call the NEW version
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums)
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error
> * Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi
> >
> > i have just built 3.1.0 using
> > perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
> > make
> > make
* Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> i have just built 3.1.0 using
> perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
> make
> make install
THis installs to /usr/local/bin/...
> trying to use the start-up script as root i get
Which start.up script?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamd]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/sp
Hi
i have just built 3.1.0 using
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
make
make install
trying to use the start-up script as root i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamd]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin start
Starting spamd: ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules
v3.001003!
SA 3.0.0 is
18 matches
Mail list logo
