Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

Hi, > gpg --armor --export KEYID > > the man page is amazingly helpful ;-) Thanks, that was helpful. The instructions have been updated to use this technique instead of copying the entire public key ring of root. cheers, skar. -- OpenProtect - The email virus/spam filter http://openprotec

Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

Hi, > Any chance of adding support for 3.1.5? (Currently fails with "dns: > query failed: 5.1.3.saupdates.openprotect.com => NXDOMAIN".) We've already added txt record for the 3.1.5 release and it should work now. cheers, skar. -- OpenProtect - The email virus/spam filter http://openpr

Re: SA v3.1.5 and Rules Problems

Those are info comments. 3.1.5 has more rigorous lint checking than 3.1.3. And you're seeing the results. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Barry Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, I have upgraded to v3.1.5 from v3.1.3 and updated all my rules from the SARE site and am now seeing info m

Re: spam filter working but not...

From: "Poohba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There are more messages in my spam folder(file) than what shows in evolution. Same goes for almost... Procmail shows its sending emails there but I don't see them. If I open the file using a text editor I see the emails but not in evolution. Is something wr

Re: Animated graphics display a subliminal message to manipulate stock market

From: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: Matthias Keller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 1:25 PM To: Spamassassin List (E-mail) Subject: Re: Animated graphics display a subliminal message to manipulate stock market >> Kee

RE: Animated graphics display a subliminal message to manipulate stock market

> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Keller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 1:25 PM > To: Spamassassin List (E-mail) > Subject: Re: Animated graphics display a subliminal message > to manipulate stock market > > >> Keep up to date with latest information

Thunderbird Coach

Nevermind..I am an 1d10t. begin:vcard n:Arnold;Chris fn:Arnold, Chris url:http://www.mytimewithgod.net version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] end:vcard

Thunderbird Coach

I got Spamassassin Coach for Thunderbird install on my linux box. The problem is now that the "learn as spam" button is dulled out. clicking on any message does not "light" the button up. what am i doing wrong? Using SLED linux and t-bird 1.5.0.5. Thanks for any help begin:vcard n:Arnold;Chris fn:A

Re: pyzor: check failed: internal error

On 2006-09-09, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Thompson wrote: >> I just updated SA from v3.1.4 to v3.1.5 and have started seeing this >> error (pyzor: check failed: internal error) in my maillog. I rebuilt >> pyzor and the message continues to appear. Is this significant?

Re: Animated graphics display a subliminal message to manipulate stock market

Michael Scheidell wrote: > Found this one post: guess we should look for BUY!! in the animated > gif? > The problem with inline images now, is that there are a lot of people > putting bmp's, gif's, jpegs in their 'sigs' now. > Whatever happened to the RFC for sigs that said 4 lines max? >> -- >>

SA v3.1.5 and Rules Problems

Hi, I have upgraded to v3.1.5 from v3.1.3 and updated all my rules from the SARE site and am now seeing info messages when running lint. Info messages: info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'RAZOR2_CHECK' info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency

Re: spam filter working but not...

On Saturday 09 September 2006 12:06, Poohba wrote: > There are more messages in my spam folder(file) than what shows in > evolution. Same goes for almost... Procmail shows its sending emails > there but I don't see them. If I open the file using a text editor I > see the emails but not in evolut

spam filter working but not...

There are more messages in my spam folder(file) than what shows in evolution. Same goes for almost... Procmail shows its sending emails there but I don't see them. If I open the file using a text editor I see the emails but not in evolution. Is something wrong with the rule? :0fw: spamassassi

Received.pm bug?

I have filed a bug report with Debian several months ago about received.pm not properly identifying HELO in some instances (which causes SPF to not work), but there hasn't been any action yet. Could a few people have a look at the report and give me your feedback as to whether you think this i

Animated graphics display a subliminal message to manipulate stock market

Found this one post: guess we should look for BUY!! in the animated gif? The problem with inline images now, is that there are a lot of people putting bmp's, gif's, jpegs in their 'sigs' now. Whatever happened to the RFC for sigs that said 4 lines max?

Re: Please sanity check these ideas for rules.

Kris Deugau wrote: mouss wrote: It even happens to me from time to time (delete the subject to replace it, then see an error in the body, switch to correct the body, then forget that the subject was deleted). *blink* What happened to the "New Message" button (or whatever it's been (re)l

Re: SPF Scores

Michael Scheidell wrote: -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:11 PM To: Michel Vaillancourt Cc: Spamassassin List (E-mail) Subject: Re: SPF Scores Why, or to what end, would you want to adjust the scores? Because if ther

RE: SPF Scores

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:11 PM > To: Michel Vaillancourt > Cc: Spamassassin List (E-mail) > Subject: Re: SPF Scores > > > Why, or to what end, would you want to adjust the scores? Because if there is a DNS

RE: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r different results

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 8:20 PM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r different results > > Second, You mis-understood my question. I