Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Monty Ree wrote:
>> Hello..
>>
>> I have operated sendmail + procmail + SA at linux.
>> and sometimes, it seems that SA doesn't work well.
>> At that times, I can see so lots of procmail processes.
>>
>> But after spamd restart, SA works well...
>>
>> So is there any scr
Monty Ree wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I have operated sendmail + procmail + SA at linux.
> and sometimes, it seems that SA doesn't work well.
> At that times, I can see so lots of procmail processes.
>
> But after spamd restart, SA works well...
>
> So is there any script or tool to monitor spamd works
Kenneth Porter wrote:
I noticed today an unusually high incidence of spam subject lines of
"Re: Hi", and I don't see a rule for this in the distribution. Do others
see this much in legitimate mail? Or could it make a good rule?
I see enough legit mail with such a subject go through my systems
Email Lists wrote this to me instead of the list:
->
-> This is normal behaviour when running --lint.
->
-> Daryl
Side note, when running
spamassassin -D --lint
How do we get that to log to a file in a bash shell. Everything I have tried
so far has failed.
Angle brackets?
spamassassin -D
Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com spamd[256]: spamd: result: . 0 -
BLANK_LINES_80_90,SUBJECT_NOVOWEL Oct 6 22:15:38 www-espphotography-com
spamd[70]: prefork: child states: II\n
Those log lines bother me a bit. The first indicates that you are scanning
pretty much a blank message. I do
RE: On spamassassin usage, from an sa ignoramus>> There may be more than you
think. I do both. I've got a "Big
Machine" (medium volume mail server) at work and I do
Fetchmail->Maildrop->SA at home.
IMHO I think its because most of us belive if you have to fetch the spam,
scan it localy,
then
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> It wants to write files into that directory, but that directory does
> not exist and spamd cannot create it.
>
> Make that directory and grant the spamd user full rights.
>
I am having the same issue. I have opened the privileges up and it still
logs errors. One cav
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
When I "test" spamassassin setup by running "spamassassin -D --lint", I
get these complaints about spf:
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo
check
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF check
[6100] dbg:
On Saturday 07 October 2006 22:36, Tomasz Chmielewski took the opportunity to
say:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > On Friday 06 October 2006 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski took the opportunity
> > to
> >
> > say:
> >> When I "test" spamassassin setup by running "spamassassin -D --lint", I
> >> get these c
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski took the opportunity to
say:
When I "test" spamassassin setup by running "spamassassin -D --lint", I
get these complaints about spf:
[6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo
check
[6100] db
On Friday 06 October 2006 11:47, Tomasz Chmielewski took the opportunity to
say:
> When I "test" spamassassin setup by running "spamassassin -D --lint", I
> get these complaints about spf:
>
> [6100] dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo
> check
> [6100] dbg: spf: no sui
Rene Caspari wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to learn SPAM (and HAM) Mails for certain users, so I execute
> sa-learn:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sa-learn --spam -u rene \
> /var/spool/cyrus/mail/r/user/rene/SPAM/learnspam/9.
>
> But --debug-leve 1 says:
>
> [...]
> [2975] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB f
Hello,
I want to learn SPAM (and HAM) Mails for certain users, so I execute
sa-learn:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sa-learn --spam -u rene \
/var/spool/cyrus/mail/r/user/rene/SPAM/learnspam/9.
But --debug-leve 1 says:
[...]
[2975] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_to
13 matches
Mail list logo
