[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Is anyone able to catch this image using Fuzzy?
For some reason the image wasn't attached for me, but if it's the
abcpill.com one which uses an animated gif with crooked writing, my
3.4.2 doesn't catch it either.
-- A.
Is anyone able to catch this image using Fuzzy?
_
From: 0sorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pharmacy Shop
gvpalsjhxiovgsapesrcncoafufa
tqcn svkavyjm
bottle of beer.png
Description: PNG image
Heute (01.03.2007/05:03 Uhr) schrieb Jim Knuth,
> Gestern (28.02.2007/18:28 Uhr) schrieb Justin Mason,
>> hey committers / PMC members --
>> please gimme your votes on these prerelease tarballs:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre2.tar.gz
> I get these errors fro
Gestern (28.02.2007/18:28 Uhr) schrieb Justin Mason,
> hey committers / PMC members --
> please gimme your votes on these prerelease tarballs:
> http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre2.tar.gz
I get these errors from --lint:
[20878] warn: netset: cannot include 127/8 as
If you have a rpm based system you could try install it that way.
Just today i did it on a fc4 box - yum install perl-Mail-SPF-Query
Other than that looks like you might have a bad server in your cpan conf.
You can rerun cpan config and choose different servers. google how to
rerun cpan conf.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 04:01:23PM -0600, Craig wrote:
> I tested upgrading to SA 3.1.8 and I receive the following score on ALL
> emails-
> 2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP
> In SA 3.1.7 and earlier there was a fix written by Michael Bell (I am
> guessing it was him-I want to give credit where credit is do,
Hello All-
I currently run Groupwise 7 as my mailserver and use Guinevere with SA enabled
to scan messages. My current version of SA is 3.1.7.
I tested upgrading to SA 3.1.8 and I receive the following score on ALL emails-
2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP
In SA 3.1.7 and earlier there was a fix written by Mic
Sorry if this is a bit off topic, but I'm hoping someone here has come
across this problem.
While installing a new machine running SA, I came across these errors
installing Mail::SPF::Query from CPAN:
Test 9 got: "This account is currently not available.: 192.0.2.1 is
neither permitted no
On Feb 22, 2007, at 5:02 PM, David Gardner wrote:
This customer is using Symantec Mail Security for SMTP which logs
the message with "SMTP ID:M200702141421121234 Info: Address or
content not allowed. Info2: The message is malformed." Looking on
the Symantec web site tells us this is a gene
I noticed all the spam getting through is getting marked bayes 0 which
is strange. The only thing I changed was cutting back on the spam
children from 15 to 4. I have now uped it to 6 and the box seems to
be handling it. (I am on a small tmp server while I rebuild main
server) I think it might
hey committers / PMC members --
please gimme your votes on these prerelease tarballs:
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre2.tar.bz2
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre2.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pr
It disables network tests. I believe you can edit /etc/default/spamassassin
and add it to the list of OPTIONS, e.g.:
OPTIONS="--local --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir"
then restart spamd
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
In order to help diagnose the problem you may also want
> If they want zero admin, check Postini or MessagesLabs, I prefer ML,
Seeing we're doing a tiny bit of advertising, I'll toss in a good word
for Spamchek - they're in Switzerland: http://www.spamchek.com/.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Stay away from Barracuda. I regretfully bought the Model 400.
Br
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>> I have the following in my local.cf file to allow anyone at that domain
>> to send from their blackberry:
>>
>> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com
>>
>> It says in the Received header that it is for the sender, but addresse
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I have the following in my local.cf file to allow anyone at that domain
> to send from their blackberry:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com
>
> It says in the Received header that it is for the sender, but addressed
> to other people. I'm assumi
Hello,
> If some work and some don't I suspect this could possibly
> be a timeout issue.
It is a timeout... see my message at 09:30 GMT this morning...
421 SMTP incoming data timeout - message abandoned
===
Hello,
> If some work and some don't I suspect this could possibly
> be a timeout issue.
It is a timeout... see my message at 09:30 GMT this morning...
421 SMTP incoming data timeout - message abandoned
Hello,
Which startup scripts? There are a lot of them, some of which might call
others... am i going to have to trawl through rc3.d or is there an
easier way?
Thanks again,
Richard.
Adam Wilbraham wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:20:28 +
> Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As fo
Hello,
I have two problems currently:
1) sa-update may or may not be working - this is not urgent.
2) spamassassin itself is not working at all - this is very urgent! lol
Does anyone have any idea why sa has stopped working for me? Let's
ignore sa-update for the time being, unless it's relevant
Any issues installing SA on a Microsoft Small Business Server with their
Exchange version?
Any recommendations pros/cons will be appreciated.
Regards,
Paul
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:52 +
Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IO::Socket::INET6
> IO::Socket::SSL
> DBI
> Mail::SPF::Query
> IP::Country::Fast
> Razor2::Client::Agent
> Net::Ident
After a quick apt-cache search I'd suggest these should be what you
need:
libsocket6-
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I have the following in my local.cf file to allow anyone at that domain
to send from their blackberry:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com
It says in the Received header that it is for the sender, but addressed
to other people. I'm assuming the sen
I have the following in my local.cf file to allow anyone at that domain
to send from their blackberry:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com
It says in the Received header that it is for the sender, but addressed
to other people. I'm assuming the sender BCC'd himself, is there
All,
Not sure if I can do this or not but here goes.
Julian Field, the developer of MailScanner was admitted to the hospital
this weekend. He is in ICU though stable condition. I'll not go into any
details, anyone interested and not on the MS list can read the thread on
the MS archive,
http
How can I get the IP address of the client host which has sent the
message, so that I can use it in rules ?
Thanks a lot.
Claude
--
You will find the CA certificate and the CRL here:
http://www.unibw.de/certs
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/28/2007
01:03:55 PM:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you - Before i go installing, do the following package names look
> correct to you:
>
> > IO::Socket::INET6
> - libio-socket-inet6-perl
>
> > IO::Socket::SSL
> - libio-socket-ssl-perl
>
> > DBI
>
> > Well what puzzles me is, is the message in queue, waiting
> to be sent
> > to someone within your domain, or is it outbound?
to be sent outbound..
> Why are you wanting
> > to manually scan it?
A user of mine try to send an email using my SMTP server, but he can't
send me the message wh
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:52 +
Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IO::Socket::INET6
> IO::Socket::SSL
> DBI
> Mail::SPF::Query
> IP::Country::Fast
> Razor2::Client::Agent
> Net::Ident
After a quick apt-cache search I'd suggest these should be what you
need:
libsocket6-p
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:20:28 +
Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for memory softlimits - i have no idea. How can i check?
In your startup scripts for exim you may have some commands softlimit /
ulimit commands...
Steve,
I think you'll get the scoring you want if you modify the lines as follows:
score SARE_ADULT2 BODY 8.0
score BAYES_99 10.0
Regards,
Tim
From: Steve Ingraham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:54 AM
To: users@spamassassin
Hello,
Thank you - Before i go installing, do the following package names look
correct to you:
> IO::Socket::INET6
- libio-socket-inet6-perl
> IO::Socket::SSL
- libio-socket-ssl-perl
> DBI
- libdbi-perl
> Mail::SPF::Query
- libmail-spf-query-perl
> IP::Country::Fast
-
I agree it doesn't sound like a SA problem. I can't help either, as I use
Postfix. Surely the Exim-SA people will be getting up soon...
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Hobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adam Wilbraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 4:59
Hello,
I have now run "sa-update -D" and it has produced this:
mail:~# sa-update -D
[2304] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[2304] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[2304] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.1.7
[2304] dbg: config:
Hello,
I would hope upgrading exim is not necessary, because that could easily
become several weeks worth of approvals, testing, downtime etc...!
As for memory softlimits - i have no idea. How can i check?
Thanks again,
Richard.
Adam Wilbraham wrote:
> My only other thoughts are - maybe you ma
Hi all guys, and first of all thank for SA :)
Today I upgraded my SA installation from 3.1.7 version to 3.1.8 and everything
is ok, but before the switch to the new version I made some test; in
particular I executed spamassassin in test and debug mode on 2 text massages
that come with sa3.18
- s
My only other thoughts are - maybe you may need to upgrade exim to a
more recent version to keep the ability to talk to spamassassin working
(probably not though...). Also have you got any memory softlimits set
for exim / spamassassin or anything else ? In the past I've had issues
with memory limit
Hello,
Thank you for the link, but it's not for spamassassin... it does look
very similar to the config i have in exim for spamassassin though.
Does anyone know if i do need to adjust the config in exim when
upgrading spamassassin from "3.0.3-2sarge1" to "3.1.7-1~bpo.1" as per
the backports repos
Looks like an exim problem to me, how is exim calling spamc?
Unfortunately I have no exim experience whatsoever (I use qmail /
qmailscanner) but maybe you need to revisit your exim config after the
upgrade... This link may be of use but I'm not sure...
http://sys-admin.org/en/node/21
On Wed, 28 F
Hello,
OK, since sending my last email (after upgrading to , but before running
"sa-update") we have been having problems:
mail:/var/log/exim4# grep BSMTP /var/log/exim4/mainlog.1
2007-02-27 17:10:34 1HM5le-0008Sj-5j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
39 matches
Mail list logo
