On Monday 19 March 2007, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I receiveid a spam message this morning in my mailbox. So I submit it to
> spamassassin to calculate the score that spamassassin give it.
>
> Here the result:
>
> Content preview: "Diable!" bird market light sort said Monte Cristo
> com
Matt Kettler wrote:
sa-exim wrote:
I have Suse 10.1 exim, spamassassin 3.1.7 with bayes first the
spamassassin does it's job very well but spam does get through once in
awhile so I move all spam to a junk folder then upload this file to
the server, then I run sa_learn on the junk file and i
hi,
Iam running spamassassin in another machine and relaying mails to
local machine(i.e i am not running spamassassin in local machine). In this
case how to reject mails destined to unknow user.
sa-exim wrote:
> I have Suse 10.1 exim, spamassassin 3.1.7 with bayes first the
> spamassassin does it's job very well but spam does get through once in
> awhile so I move all spam to a junk folder then upload this file to
> the server, then I run sa_learn on the junk file and it loads the
> toke
At 19:08 19-03-2007, Joey Davis wrote:
Don't think it's a permission problem, at least not on this directory.
drwx-- 2 sa-milt sa-milt 1024 Mar 19 17:29 spamass-milter
The milter is not running. Start it.
Regards,
-sm
ram01 wrote:
> I just recently added rules_du_jour script and I am trying to get it to work.
> A preliminary lint gives these lines:
>
> [25132] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org/80_additional.cf
> [25132] dbg: config: using
> "/var/lib/spa
Joey Davis wrote:
It never creates the socket.
And you're expecting it to work? :)
Initially, the socket was set to reside in
/var/run/spamass.sock and then I saw one suggestion that said to change it
to /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass.sock. I made the change but still
received the unsafe
I just recently added rules_du_jour script and I am trying to get it to work.
A preliminary lint gives these lines:
[25132] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org/80_additional.cf
[25132] dbg: config: using
"/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/update
It never creates the socket. Initially, the socket was set to reside in
/var/run/spamass.sock and then I saw one suggestion that said to change it
to /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass.sock. I made the change but still
received the unsafe messages.
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Sh
Don't think it's a permission problem, at least not on this directory.
drwx-- 2 sa-milt sa-milt 1024 Mar 19 17:29 spamass-milter
Joey
From: CPTeam Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 8:17 PM
To: 'Joey Davis'
Subject: RE: spa
Joey Davis wrote:
Greetings ...
I can not get spamassassin to work. I have seen this problem in some
newgroups but no definitive solution. Here is the information
OS Version: FC5
Sendmail: 8.13.7
Spamassassin: 3.1.3
Log entries:
Mar 19 17:28:32 obwat sendmail[29903]: l2JMSW21029903: Mil
Greetings ...
I can not get spamassassin to work. I have seen this problem in some
newgroups but no definitive solution. Here is the information
OS Version: FC5
Sendmail: 8.13.7
Spamassassin: 3.1.3
Log entries:
Mar 19 17:28:32 obwat sendmail[29903]: l2JMSW21029903: Milter
(spamassassin): lo
I'm having a problem getting SA v3.1.8 to test out. It's failing
prefs_include.t, test 1. Here's the background:
RedHat Linux ES3, Perl 5.8.0, latest CPAN, Net::DNS, Test modules.
The test result is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# ./prefs_include.t
1..2
# Running under perl version 5.008 for linux
# C
Praveen Kumar wrote:
Hi ALL,
I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's working
fine but
success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%).
How can i fine tune to get best results?
A setup that is only catching 20-25% of spam usually has a config
problem.
"Sandeep Agarwal" schrieb:
> Mar 18 23:44:13 ngblhost3 spamd[25141]: spamd: checking message <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> for qscand:510
> Mar 18 23:44:53 ngblhost3 qmail-scanner[26689]:
> Clear:RC:0(89.32.82.253):SA:0(?/?): 603.4716 17803 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
> PROTECTED] This_is_unbeleivable! <[
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I receiveid a spam message this morning in my mailbox. So I submit it to
spamassassin to calculate the score that spamassassin give it.
Here the result:
Content preview: "Diable!" bird market light sort said Monte Cristo
compassionately,
"it i Villefort press
"Sandeep Agarwal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> above errors are just samples, the log is full of these messages. is
> there some bug is PGSQL implementaion
I am running SA with psql and the only log messages are autovacuum
ones, so it is not a general problem.
Hi Sandeep,
At 05:28 19-03-2007, Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
i am using 3.1.7 with SQL based setup using Postgres 8.1.4 as the
RDBMS. postgresql server log is full of deadlock detected message
ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 18045 waits for ShareLock on transaction 2438579;
blocked by proc
Hi there,
is there a way to use "user_prefs" on a system where spamassassin is
called by amavisd-new and doesn't have local user accounts?
I use the Spamfilter just as an gateway!
Thanks Frank
Amavisd-new runs as the amavisd-new user so the only user_prefs file used is
the one for the amavis
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I receiveid a spam message this morning in my mailbox. So I submit it to
spamassassin to calculate the score that spamassassin give it.
Here the result:
...
Content analysis details: (6.2 points, 5.0 required)
...
So it is clear at all
hello list,
i am using 3.1.7 with SQL based setup using Postgres 8.1.4 as the
RDBMS. postgresql server log is full of deadlock detected message
ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 18045 waits for ShareLock on transaction 2438579;
blocked by process 18049.
Process 18049 waits for Sh
172.20.8.86 is in a private network. Do you trust it? Control it? In any
case, it appears that Trusted/Internal networks are not set up correctly.
You need to provide more information about your setup and the forwarder.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Brian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mar 19, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Paul Hurley wrote:
Hello all, Happy Pi day for last week...
I'm running Spam Assassin V3.1.7.0 via SAProxy for Win32 (http://
sourceforge.net/projects/sawin32/). I've recently implemented SPF
for my domain, which is working well. However I ahve a problem
wit
On Monday 19 March 2007 09:22, ram wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:20 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> > Hi ALL,
> >
> > I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's
> > working fine but
> >
> > success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%).
> >
> > How can i fine t
> > Do I have to set it to 0?
>
> No, but that may explain why the two servers have different
> Bayes scores for similar messages. If they receive different
> message streams they will be learning a different view of the
> email world.
OK. Thanks all clear for me!!
> > But Then how I have to
Hello all, Happy Pi day for last week...
I'm running Spam Assassin V3.1.7.0 via SAProxy for Win32
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/sawin32/). I've recently implemented
SPF for my domain, which is working well. However I ahve a problem with
SPF on email I receieve. I have a few old email acc
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
what it can be the reason of the different score assigned?
why the second system doesn't assign an AWL score?
They give different Bayes scores so the Bayes databases have
been trained with different messages. Do you have autolearn
switched on?
# Bayesian classi
Hi there,
is there a way to use "user_prefs" on a system where spamassassin is
called by amavisd-new and doesn't have local user accounts?
I use the Spamfilter just as an gateway!
Thanks Frank
> > what it can be the reason of the different score assigned?
> > why the second system doesn't assign an AWL score?
>
> They give different Bayes scores so the Bayes databases have
> been trained with different messages. Do you have autolearn
> switched on?
# Bayesian classifier auto-learn
Hello,
I receiveid a spam message this morning in my mailbox. So I submit it to
spamassassin to calculate the score that spamassassin give it.
Here the result:
Content preview: "Diable!" bird market light sort said Monte Cristo
compassionately,
"it i Villefort pressed her plate earth hand to
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:20 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I've integrated Spamassassin 3.1.8 with SUN Java messaging. It's
> working fine but
>
> success rate of spam-detection is very less (around 20-25%).
>
> How can i fine tune to get best results?
>
> TIA,
Use rules_du_jour.
Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
> thanks for the response, and its my mistake that i didn't read the
> FAQ, it says that this occurs for 3 main reason:
> 1. mail size is large enough that the scanning is skipped
> 2. error occur ed with spamd
> 3. low memory
>
> this is the other maillog dump of yesterday n
32 matches
Mail list logo
