Looking at the regular expressions it looks like Spammers are easily
working around these rules sets by adding "ed" or "ing" to the word
in question as it doesn't look like the rulesets consider this.
Hi,
The same problem happen if you try to have amavis database replicated on
multiple mysql server.
It would be nice to have a way around this and also a way to configure a
fail over mysql server.
Regards
Cedric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
think i ran into the same problem. try a direct backu
On Monday 30 April 2007, Eric Goforth wrote:
>Hey all,
>
>I have a quick thought about something we may want to all consider. For
>those of us that use SA (all of us right?) and we use Bayes (most of us
>I assume) and that have whitelisted this list (a few anyhow) that get
>people forwarding their
think i ran into the same problem. try a direct backup from old mysql host
to new mysql server. or you can also stop mysql on the old host and tar up
the raw files and move them over that way.
On 4/30/07, Eric Goforth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having a crazy thing happen when trying to restor
Eric Goforth wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a quick thought about something we may want to all consider. For
> those of us that use SA (all of us right?) and we use Bayes (most of us
> I assume) and that have whitelisted this list (a few anyhow) that get
> people forwarding their spam messages to th
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:03:13PM -0700, Eric Goforth wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a quick thought about something we may want to all consider. For
> those of us that use SA (all of us right?) and we use Bayes (most of us
> I assume) and that have whitelisted this list (a few anyhow) that get
>
Eric Goforth wrote:
Hey all,
I have a quick thought about something we may want to all consider. For
those of us that use SA (all of us right?) and we use Bayes (most of us
I assume) and that have whitelisted this list (a few anyhow) that get
people forwarding their spam messages to the list (o
I guess that makes much better sense... Point well taken and thanks.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:28 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [SA] Re: Fowarding spams to the list Not good???
On Mon, Ap
Having a crazy thing happen when trying to restore my Bayes database to a new
MySql Server.
During the restore process, it stops with the following error message.
However, it is clearly only partial informaiton as some of the characters must
be goofy ascii codes. The screen jumps around du
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:03:13PM -0700, Eric Goforth wrote:
> I may be off since I am still a newbie to SA and in particular how Bayes
> does its job... But... Food for thought. Can we avoid forwarding spam
> messages to the list?
The more appropriate, and previously stated, way to deal with
Hey all,
I have a quick thought about something we may want to all consider. For
those of us that use SA (all of us right?) and we use Bayes (most of us
I assume) and that have whitelisted this list (a few anyhow) that get
people forwarding their spam messages to the list (only a couple I
think..
Hello all,
I am getting lots of such spam. Any help in catching those would be really
helpful. Thanks
Warm Regards,
Suhas Ingale
-Original Message-
From: Dierolf Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:21 PM
To: Wells Jimmy
Subject: Re: Best friends
If you
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
> The problem with automated reporting is that we get loads of spurious
> abuse reports from idiots who report mails with a link to
> mailscanner.info in the footer (ie. the default install)
>
> So, unless you build some kind of sanity into it you just annoy peo
geist_ wrote:
Daryl C. W. O wrote:
Are you using the -r or --pidfile option to get spamd to create a pidfile?
Daryl
here is my /etc/default/spamassassin file :
ENABLED=1
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --helper-home-dir -v -m 10 -u vpopmail
--nouser-config"
PIDFILE="/var/run/spamd.pid"
and i us
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Andrzej Adam Filip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ...omissis...
>
> P.S.
> Sending LARTs can be automated using spamcop-ack or spamcup
> http://anfi.homeunix.net/perl/spamcop-ack.pl
No need to: you can ask for a SpamCop "quick" account to SpamCop's admins.
The problem with automated reporting is that we get loads of spurious
abuse reports from idiots who report mails with a link to
mailscanner.info in the footer (ie. the default install)
So, unless you build some kind of sanity into it you just annoy people
like us
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Black
Marc Perkel wrote:
> As you know SA reports spam to various service like Pyzor, Razor,
> Spamcop, etc. Why not have a module that sends messages to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. If we had such
> a module then these free email services could automatically shut down
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:52:39PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > OK - I did this with Exim rules but the same trick could be
> used in SA.
> > I figured out a trick that catches 419 spam with amazing accuracy.
> >
> > ...
> > So - who uses one freemail address with a reply-to of another? 419
> >
Daryl C. W. O wrote:
>
> Are you using the -r or --pidfile option to get spamd to create a pidfile?
>
> Daryl
>
>
here is my /etc/default/spamassassin file :
ENABLED=1
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --helper-home-dir -v -m 10 -u vpopmail
--nouser-config"
PIDFILE="/var/run/spamd.pid"
and i use /e
geist_ wrote:
Hi,
spamassassin works fine on my system, except it seems that it doesn't create
any pidfile in/var/run/
i read in the /etc/default/spamassassin script that if i use -u option the
user need to have permissions to write the pid file...
i m kind of newbie and i tried to touch a spa
Hi,
spamassassin works fine on my system, except it seems that it doesn't create
any pidfile in/var/run/
i read in the /etc/default/spamassassin script that if i use -u option the
user need to have permissions to write the pid file...
i m kind of newbie and i tried to touch a spamd.pid & then ch
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
As you know SA reports spam to various service like Pyzor, Razor, Spamcop,
etc. Why not have a module that sends messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. If we had such a module then these
free email services could automat
Michael Scheidell writes:
> Fixes several issues:
> #1, on FreeBSD 6.2:
>
> SpamAssassin Bug 5313: spamd error: 'prefork: select returned -1!
> recovering: Bad file descriptor'
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5313
>
> Patches backported from 3.20rc3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Perkel wrote:
> As you know SA reports spam to various service like Pyzor, Razor,
> Spamcop, etc. Why not have a module that sends messages to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. If we had such
> a module then these free email services could automatically shut down
>
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:10:09PM -0700, J. wrote:
> My sa-learn runs have been taking a long time to get started. Someone
> suggested here to add the -D flag to see what's going on. When I did
> that, the terminal hung. I used ctrl-c to get my prompt back and then
> that "locker" line showed up.
As you know SA reports spam to various service like Pyzor, Razor,
Spamcop, etc. Why not have a module that sends messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. If we had such
a module then these free email services could automatically shut down
spammers after seeing a
Fixes several issues:
#1, on FreeBSD 6.2:
SpamAssassin Bug 5313: spamd error: 'prefork: select returned -1!
recovering: Bad file descriptor'
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5313
Patches backported from 3.20rc3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#2, fix sa-update directory to be consist
John Rudd wrote:
But even if I wanted a dynamic IP doesn't make much sense as MX. :-(
> Part of the operating definition of "soho mail server" that I am using
> for botnet is: if your operation is so small that you're forced to use a
> dynamic IP address for your email server, then you're proba
Andy Spiegl wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
b) spiegl.de has 1-5 MX records, and one of them has 1-5 A records, one
of which resolves to the submitting relay (87.152.143.202).
Hm, but why would I want to put this dynamic IP into the list of MXs?
The soho mailserver doesn't accept mails from outside.
John Rudd wrote:
> b) spiegl.de has 1-5 MX records, and one of them has 1-5 A records, one
> of which resolves to the submitting relay (87.152.143.202).
Hm, but why would I want to put this dynamic IP into the list of MXs?
The soho mailserver doesn't accept mails from outside.
Shouldn't the BOT
Henrik Krohns writes:
>On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:52:39PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>> OK - I did this with Exim rules but the same trick could be used in SA.
>> I figured out a trick that catches 419 spam with amazing accuracy.
>>
>> ...
>> So - who uses one freemail address with a reply-to of
Any more details - which version of FreeBSD, how are you trying to
install it (ports/cpan/source???)
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 April 2007 18:00
> To:
32 matches
Mail list logo
