Gokhan ALKAN wrote:
is there any way check mx record as from ip adress and compare it sender
ip address ? so spamassassin can decide its spam ??
Why would you want SpamAssassin to consider mail that didn't come from a
server listed in a domain's MX record as spam?
Daryl
We should have an out going spam filter functional by July 2007
www.think-antispam.com
hamann.w wrote:
>
> Ian Eiloart wrote
>
>>>
>>> --On 26 December 2006 05:53:12 + Monty Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello, list.
>>> >
>>> > I have used well SA with procmail well agains
Bret Miller wrote:
I need to look at setting up a custom rule based on a SPF
result. If mail is sent from domain xyz.com and the SPF
record matches, let it pass as per normal. If on the other
hand the SPF record fails for xyz.com, add +5 to the score.
This has to happen ONLY for dom
is there any way check mx record as from ip adress and compare it sender ip
address ? so spamassassin can decide its spam ??
-
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
Hi,
I've been upgrading several stable servers running 3.1.8 for months
without any issues to 3.1.20, and got a problem in one of them.
When trying to restart spamd, I get this:
Beyond the s/3.1.20/v3.2.0/ issue that some people cannot get past.
I have the same issue. I had to juggle my cf/
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:45:32PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I have to admit that I'm seeing higher server load levels since
upgrading to 3.2.0 from 3.1.8 as well. It was enough to make me wonder
if some ne features were slowing things down.
Last time I checke
It would be interesting on some system experiencing this slowdown to put
'use bytes' back into SA and see what happens with the performance. This
wouldn't be any sort of a solution, but it would be an interesting data
point.
Loren
I have to admit that I'm seeing higher server load lev
On Tue, May 8, 2007 13:47, JvdW wrote:
> score. This has to happen ONLY for domain xyz.com. All others will be handled
> by Spamassassin the normal way.
>
> I'm new to these sort of rules so any help would be greatly appreciated.
in local.cf put
whitelist_from_spf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
def_whi
On Tue, May 8, 2007 02:02, Ken A wrote:
> I Installed MAIL::DKIM and enabled the DKIM plugin.
>
> Now I'm seeing DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME hit every message unless the message
> hits DKIM_SIGNED and DKIM_VERIFIED. The score for DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME
> is set to 0.
>
> Obviously this is wrong, since mos
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:45:32PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I have to admit that I'm seeing higher server load levels since
> upgrading to 3.2.0 from 3.1.8 as well. It was enough to make me wonder
> if some ne features were slowing things down.
Last time I checked, which has been a while, gra
Jerry Durand wrote:
At 01:26 PM 5/8/2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Bayes auto expiries (taking to long and getting killed)? I think
that's a 600 second timeout.
A couple of months ago I was getting a lot of timeouts due to
auto-expire so I disabled it and set a cron job to stop the mail
Joeri Belis wrote:
> setup :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ spamc -V
> SpamAssassin Client version 3.1.7
> compiled with SSL support (OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006)
>
> i get totaly different scores when i run spamc from the commandline as
> vpopmail user as when i run i from procmail also as vpopmail us
The Doctor wrote:
>
>
> Interesting enough when spamd choke on the secondary server,
> it just piled the mail up.
>
Sounds like you've got your mail being double-scanned. Once by
MailScanner, once by something using spamd.
> Still getting back to the original question,
> is their anything new
At 01:26 PM 5/8/2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Bayes auto expiries (taking to long and getting killed)? I think
that's a 600 second timeout.
A couple of months ago I was getting a lot of timeouts due to
auto-expire so I disabled it and set a cron job to stop the mail
server and force expir
looks like I found the problematic file:
70_imageinfo.cf
was in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Yes, there is a PR in the queue.
The FreeBSD ports tree is currently frozen for the Xorg 7.2 import.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
-
Has anyone contacted the FreeBSD ports maintainer for re2c to update to 0.12.0?
On 5/8/07, Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Parker wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
header L_TO_ME ToCc =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
describe L_TO_ME Email addressed to me
score L_TO_ME 0.010
You can't do rules with SQL user prefs, not even with allow_user_rules.
Only non-admin config options are allowed.
That'
Duane Hill wrote:
>
> header L_TO_ME ToCc =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> describe L_TO_ME Email addressed to me
> score L_TO_ME 0.010
>
You can't do rules with SQL user prefs, not even with allow_user_rules.
Only non-admin config options are allowed.
Michael
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Running SpamAssassin v3.2.0 on Solaris 9, perl v5.8.8.
I am getting really poor performance with v3.2.0 compared with v3.1.8.
Average scan time per message is doubled (or worse). I’m also seeing
messages like this in the log file (although not all the time):
Tryin
Hey John,
thanks very much!
It was infact the hostname. Changed it and now it´s all good!
Cheers mate!
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, DogMatz wrote:
>
>> Received: from lvps87-230-7-51.dedicated.hosteurope.de
>> (server.marcelkorte.de [87.230.7.51])
>>
>> Well, I guess that
On Tue, 8 May 2007, DogMatz wrote:
> Received: from lvps87-230-7-51.dedicated.hosteurope.de
> (server.marcelkorte.de [87.230.7.51])
>
> Well, I guess that the reason lies in "Received: from
> lvps87-230-7-51.dedicated.hosteurope.de".
Yup.
> But still. I don´t understand where that might come
Stephen:
A follow up to my own message. I have been able to successfully install
3.2 on my backup SLES 10 mail server from the download source code.
CPAN still fails with the error you mentioned. When I installed 3.18 I
used CPAN without problems.
Best
Craig Carriere wrote:
> Stephen:
>
> C
Ooops :-) Here we go:
---
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running SpamAssassin v3.2.0 on Solaris 9, perl v5.8.8.
I am getting really poor performance with v3.2.0 compared with v3.1.8.
Average scan time per message is doubled (or worse). I'm also seeing
messages like this in the log file (although not all the time):
May 7 17:10:20 localhost spamd
I am having trouble running spamd. This started after I installed FuzzyOCR,
found errors, upgraded perl to 5.8.8 to resolve those errors and ended up
with this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /etc/init.d/spamassassin start
Starting spamd: Can't locate object method "register_domain" via package
"IO::Socket:
DogMatz wrote:
Emails from one of my accounts often get the HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR but I can´t
see why!
Nor can we since you didn't include the headers from the actual message
scanned, rather just the report_safe encapsulation headers.
Daryl
Check this mail:
Received: from localhost by webb
Emails from one of my accounts often get the HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR but I can´t
see why!
Check this mail:
Received: from localhost by webbox413.server-home.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.1.3);
Tue, 08 May 2007 15:52:01 +0200
From: Marcel Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
fyi: anyone wanting to experiment with sa-compile on FREEBSD can dl the
patches here:
http://www.secnap.com/downloads/re2c.tgz
(if you have to ask how to modify Makefile to make it work, then wait
till I can release 3.2.0_1)
Original Message
Subject:Re: ports/1125
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:57:17AM +0100, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
> Since upgrading Bayes nolonger appears to trigger. If I run a -D --lint in
> the tests section at the bottom it does not report :-
>
> [18375] dbg: check:
> tests=BAYES_20,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,TO_CC_NONE
Everyt
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Joeri Belis wrote:
> run from cmd line as vpopmail user
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=3.4 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,ADVANCE_FEE_2,
>BAYES_00,MISSING_HB_SEP,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,
>TO_CC_NONE autolearn=no version=3.1.7
Ev
Stephen:
Cannot help you out, but I also receive the same errors on both of my
SLES10 boxes. Install on Opensuse 10.1 from either source or cpan works
fine which is strange since SLES10 is based on 10.1.
Best,
Stephen Carter wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've tried to install SA 3.2.0 on both an unpatc
setup :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ spamc -V
SpamAssassin Client version 3.1.7
compiled with SSL support (OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006)
i get totaly different scores when i run spamc from the commandline as
vpopmail user as when i run i from procmail also as vpopmail user.
Here are some outputs
run
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:21:38AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > I know there are 3 new packages out for MailScanner, spamd and clamd
> > however I cannot determine with is adding to the /etc/mail/access file
> > 550 We do not accept junk mail .
> >
> > I need to turn of this f
The Doctor wrote:
> I know there are 3 new packages out for MailScanner, spamd and clamd
> however I cannot determine with is adding to the /etc/mail/access file
> 550 We do not accept junk mail .
>
> I need to turn of this feature as it block transmission from secondary to
> +primary.
>
> Also I a
I know there are 3 new packages out for MailScanner, spamd and clamd
however I cannot determine with is adding to the /etc/mail/access file
550 We do not accept junk mail .
I need to turn of this feature as it block transmission from secondary to
+primary.
Also I am running Botnet 0.7 .
> I need to look at setting up a custom rule based on a SPF
> result. If mail is sent from domain xyz.com and the SPF
> record matches, let it pass as per normal. If on the other
> hand the SPF record fails for xyz.com, add +5 to the score.
> This has to happen ONLY for domain xyz.com. All others w
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
To: Duane Hill
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
really? news to me ;)
No
Hi all
I need to look at setting up a custom rule based on a SPF result. If
mail is sent from domain xyz.com and the SPF record matches, let it
pass as per normal. If on the other hand the SPF record fails for
xyz.com, add +5 to the score. This has to happen ONLY for
domain xyz.com. All others
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:59 PM
> To: Duane Hill
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
> really? news to me ;)
Not sa-compile, just sa-compile on
> -Original Message-
> From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 8:06 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available
>
>
>body_0.xs: In function
> 'XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_sc
The installation notes for Fedora Core (version 5 and 6) should say that the
rpm needed
is giflib-utils not libungif-utils. Can someone amend the wiki please? I don't
know how
to use a wiki (in fact I really don't like them).
Cheers
Bill
--
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
www.maidment
Noc Phibee schrieb:
Hi
when i start spamassassin -D --lint, i have:
[20058] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_toks
[20058] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_seen
[20058] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[20058] dbg: bayes: DB jou
Here is my lint :-
SpamAssassin Lint[18703] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all0
[18703] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG 8E-05
[18703] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.2.03E-05
[18703] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.0.00064
[18703] dbg: util: running in tai
Hi,
Since upgrading Bayes nolonger appears to trigger. If I run a -D --lint in the
tests section at the bottom it does not report :-
[18375] dbg: check:
tests=BAYES_20,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,TO_CC_NONE
plus no RBL tests fire anymore :(
I have checked the pre-requisites and tha
Duane Hill writes:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Duane Hill writes:
> >> On Sat, 5 May 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >>
> >> [SNIP]
> >>> There are a LOT of subtle changes... But for the brave, here is a
> >>> tarball.
> >>> cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
> >>> rm -rf
>
hi -- read the FAQ.
--j.
Noc Phibee writes:
> Hi
>
> it's normal that i have a very big quantity of file
> into /var/spool/spamassassin ? :
>
> -r 1 qscand qscand168 déc 11 23:00
> bayes.lock.mx-2.mondomaine.org.10008
> -r 1 qscand qscand 96 fév 5 23:00
> bay
Hi
it's normal that i have a very big quantity of file
into /var/spool/spamassassin ? :
-r 1 qscand qscand168 déc 11 23:00
bayes.lock.mx-2.mondomaine.org.10008
-r 1 qscand qscand 96 fév 5 23:00
bayes.lock.mx-2.mondomaine.org.10159
-r 1 qscand qscand
Hi
when i start spamassassin -D --lint, i have:
[20058] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_toks
[20058] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_seen
[20058] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[20058] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync:
49 matches
Mail list logo
