Re: test=none

Daryl C. W. O'Shea schrieb: > > --- > trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX > trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX > internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24 > internal_networks 192.168.2.0/24 > internal_networks 127.0.0.1 > --- I am usi

Re: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:45:54PM +1000, ip guy wrote: > Anyone know why I'd keep seeing this in the mail herders of email scanner > for spam > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=? Whatever you have calling SA is adding markup. SA won't ever put in question marks. My guess is that it's

Re: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?

Maybe i wasn't clear. i guess it was the way i asked. Anyone know why I'd keep seeing this in the mail herders of email scanner for spam X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=? My setup currently uses spamc v2.40 on hostA to forward to spamd v3.1.8 on hostB My local.cf on hostB is setup

Re: test=none

Matt Kettler wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: I get now hints from the logfiles concerning a timeout, my trusted/internal networks in local.cf are set as follwing --- trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX internal_networks

Re: SpamAssassin timed out and was killed

leiw wrote: > Hello, > > The following package for my company mail-gateway: > > Centos 4.4 > spamassassin-3.2.0-1.el4.rf > clamd-0.90.2-1.el4.rf > MailScanner-perl-MIME-Base64-3.05-5 > postfix-2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2 > > I was checked the maillog that always show the following message: > > May 16 10:29:01

SpamAssassin timed out and was killed

Hello, The following package for my company mail-gateway: Centos 4.4 spamassassin-3.2.0-1.el4.rf clamd-0.90.2-1.el4.rf MailScanner-perl-MIME-Base64-3.05-5 postfix-2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2 I was checked the maillog that always show the following message: May 16 10:29:01 mailgateway MailScanner[7437]: S

Re: Tag Level for spam

Martin Hochreiter wrote: > Hi! > > Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail > as spam? > > (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) > 5.0 is the "recommended" default. This level will tune SA to treat false positives (nonspam tagged as spam) as rough

Re: test=none

Matt Kettler wrote: > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > >>> I get now hints from the logfiles concerning a timeout, >>> my trusted/internal networks in local.cf are set as follwing >>> --- >>> trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX >>> trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX >>> internal_netw

Re: test=none

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >>> >> I get now hints from the logfiles concerning a timeout, >> my trusted/internal networks in local.cf are set as follwing >> --- >> trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX >> trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX >> internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24 >> intern

Re: tracking down problem messages

Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Ok I was able to track them and found that they are timing out after about 5 > mins- spamd is timing them out- I'm assuming its large messages that it is > timing out on- what rule/acl would I need and WHERE would I enter it to > tell SA to ignore or not to scan anythin

Re: RelayCountry Issues

On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Big Wave Dave wrote: >> >> > Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message? >> > Should I send it to the list as well? >> > Thanks for yo

Re: RelayCountry Issues

On 5/15/07, Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote the following on 5/15/2007 12:54 PM -0800: > On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Big Wave Dave wrote: >> >> > Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message? >> > Should I send it to t

Re: RelayCountry Issues

Big Wave Dave wrote: On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message? > Should I send it to the list as well? > Thanks for your assistance. Either would probably do, might as well use a real messag

Re: RelayCountry Issues

Big Wave Dave wrote the following on 5/15/2007 12:54 PM -0800: On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message? > Should I send it to the list as well? > Thanks for your assistance. Either would pr

Re: RelayCountry Issues

On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message? > Should I send it to the list as well? > Thanks for your assistance. Either would probably do, might as well use a real message. Sending to the lis

Re: RelayCountry Issues

Big Wave Dave wrote: Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message? Should I send it to the list as well? Thanks for your assistance. Either would probably do, might as well use a real message. Sending to the list is fine. Daryl

Re: RelayCountry Issues

On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Big Wave Dave wrote: >> > I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the >> > RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but ha

RE: tracking down problem messages

Ok I was able to track them and found that they are timing out after about 5 mins- spamd is timing them out- I'm assuming its large messages that it is timing out on- what rule/acl would I need and WHERE would I enter it to tell SA to ignore or not to scan anything over 1 meg. Running FreeBSD

Re: RelayCountry Issues

Big Wave Dave wrote: On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the > RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not > had any success. > However, the header is never added. > >

Re: tracking down problem messages

How are you calling SA? procmail? Amavis? plugins? Which version are you running? Most likely, the RBL checks are the reason for that delays. Try setting skip_rbl_checks 1 in the local.cf, then look over the statistics again. If scan times go down, blame your nameserver... Luix! 2007/5/15, Je

tracking down problem messages

Hi everyone, I'm seeing by the output of message analysis time that some messages must be hanging up SA; Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 2019 Number of spams : 1108 ( 54.88%) Number of clean messages: 911 ( 45.12%) Average m

Re: no loaded plugin implements

> Ah, running amavisd-new chrooted, yes? > > Gary V Yes Sir! I had copy all files over but I guess some way some how that 320 file didnt copy over. Now to sort through the rest of the setup and get it to start filtering :) Thanks!

Re: no loaded plugin implements

>> # amavisd -d config debug-sa >> ps: pid: No such file or directory >> Pid_file "/var/amavisd/amavisd.pid" already exists. Overwriting! >> [13583] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen. >> [13583] dbg: config: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules pre >> files >> [13583] dbg: config: read fil

Re: no loaded plugin implements

>> # amavisd -d config debug-sa >> ps: pid: No such file or directory >> Pid_file "/var/amavisd/amavisd.pid" already exists. Overwriting! >> [13583] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen. >> [13583] dbg: config: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules pre >> files >> [13583] dbg: config: read file

Re: RelayCountry Issues

On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Big Wave Dave wrote: > I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the > RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not > had any success. > However, the header is never added. > > In init.pre, I have i

Re: no loaded plugin implements

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now run amavisd -d config debug-sa Amavisd-new may disagree on where it looks for SA stuff. Gary V Thanks all for the help .. Here is the output to Gary's suggeston .. Seems all the same .. Again thank you everyone. # amavisd -d config debug-sa ps: pid: No such file

Re: test=none

Martin Hochreiter wrote: Some messages here get tests=none. The two conditions I've found here are 1) like Matt already mentioned, a timeout in communication using spamc, or 2) the message was received totally within our network (trusted/internal). Perhaps maybe you don't have the trusted/intern

Re: Setting up an email rule for these posts

At 10:54 AM 5/15/2007, Chris wrote: How do the others here do it please ? I filter on List-Id: I hate these lists where I have to remember to hit REPLY-ALL instead of REPLY, I often wind up having to go send a message again. The only thing worse is one list where I have to use REPLY-ALL an

Re: no loaded plugin implements

> On its own SA appears to be working. I'd check to make sure that > whatever user amavisd runs as (or at least starts as) can read your > config files. If that looks good and it still doesn't work I'd check > with the folks on the amavisd list. > > Daryl > BTW the permissions for the spamassassi

Re: no loaded plugin implements

> Now run > amavisd -d config debug-sa > > Amavisd-new may disagree on where it looks for SA stuff. > > Gary V > Thanks all for the help .. Here is the output to Gary's suggeston .. Seems all the same .. Again thank you everyone. # amavisd -d config debug-sa ps: pid: No such file or directory Pid

Re: Setting up an email rule for these posts

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:54:24PM +0200, Chris wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-) > > I can see that this forum is an excellent source of > useful information with some very helpful members, but > am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising > the

Re: RelayCountry Issues

Big Wave Dave wrote: I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not had any success. However, the header is never added. In init.pre, I have individually tried each: add_header all Relay _RELAYCOUNTRY_ add_h

Re: Setting up an email rule for these posts

Chris wrote: Hi all, I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-) I can see that this forum is an excellent source of useful information with some very helpful members, but am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising the emails coming in from the forum. Been using message boa

Re: Setting up an email rule for these posts

Chris wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-) > > I can see that this forum is an excellent source of > useful information with some very helpful members, but > am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising > the emails coming in from the forum. > > Been

Re: Setting up an email rule for these posts

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:54:24PM +0200, Chris wrote: > How do the others here do it please ? Use the List-Id header (it's actually the standard way to filter lists in general). -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Any fool can criticize and complain - and most do. pgpHXi1SzGKn7.pgp Description: PGP

Setting up an email rule for these posts

Hi all, I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-) I can see that this forum is an excellent source of useful information with some very helpful members, but am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising the emails coming in from the forum. Been using message boards and forums

Re: no loaded plugin implements

> Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' to make sure SA is loading your config from > where you think it should be. For whatever reason it's not reading your > v320.pre file (probably due to location or permissions). > > Daryl > Thanks Daryl, Here is the output and the config file is being read where i

Re: no loaded plugin implements

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:08PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is the output and the config file is being read where i edited and > expect. Any ideas from the output? [...] > [28524] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v320.pre [...] > [28524] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAss

Solved X-SPam different info

Hello, I Solved the problem by adding following rule in my local.cf file add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_ regards Patrick Slokker -- Hello, After a Spamassassin update from 3.1.5 to 3.

Re: no loaded plugin implements

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' to make sure SA is loading your config from where you think it should be. For whatever reason it's not reading your v320.pre file (probably due to location or permissions). Daryl Thanks Daryl, Here is the output and the config file is be

Re[2]: plugin for use of spamc -d

Hello JamesDR, Tuesday, May 15, 2007, 7:08:53 PM, you wrote: > Peter Mikeska (MiKi) wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> >> I would like to ask for help ;) >> I have relay server which is overloaded already and I have second >> server which is powerfull. I want to use spamc -d ... used as plugin >> so sc

Re: no loaded plugin implements

> Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' to make sure SA is loading your config from > where you think it should be. For whatever reason it's not reading your > v320.pre file (probably due to location or permissions). > > Daryl > Thanks Daryl, Here is the output and the config file is being read where i e

Re: no loaded plugin implements

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ### May 14 21:29:21 MARTINI.happynetworks.net /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[23697]: (!!)TROUBLE in pre_loop_hook: check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! at /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm l

Re: plugin for use of spamc -d

Peter Mikeska (MiKi) wrote: > Hello All, > > > I would like to ask for help ;) > I have relay server which is overloaded already and I have second > server which is powerfull. I want to use spamc -d ... used as plugin > so score which SA get from this (conenct to powerfull server to get > score)

plugin for use of spamc -d

Hello All, I would like to ask for help ;) I have relay server which is overloaded already and I have second server which is powerfull. I want to use spamc -d ... used as plugin so score which SA get from this (conenct to powerfull server to get score) will be added to score from relay server. Ba

RE: /etc/mail/spamassassin files

> > It's just a way to order the loading as I understand. .pre files are all > read and processed before any .cf files. It insures that any plugins can > be loaded and initialized prior to any rules that use the plugins. > > Bret > > Thank you - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.ab

RelayCountry Issues

I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not had any success. I have the IP::Country::Fast /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/IP/Country /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/IP/Country.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.

Re: SA and Amavisd-new 2.5.0

On May 15, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: Release notes suggest a set of SA rules to match these. ok, I put the maps back to 0.1 and put those rules in local.cf

Re: Problem upgrading from 3.1.8 to 3.1.20, check.pm

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:14:24AM -0500, Gabriel Millerd wrote: > Beyond the s/3.1.20/v3.2.0/ issue that some people cannot get past. >> I have the same issue. I had to juggle my cf/pre files entries for >> quite some time to get past the check_scan problem you describe for >> spamd to run pe

RE: /etc/mail/spamassassin files

> Someone mentioned issues with config files in > /etc/mail/spamassassin in regards to the newer 3.2.0 > > I understand what you mentioned about what should be in .pre > files and .cf files > > Did you find any other issues with just general alternatively > named .cf files or problems with them? I

RE: perl version

> Is there a standard perl version that the SA team aspires to > and uses as a baseline or some sort? > > If so, is it the 5.8.8 or newer or ??? For running on Windows, 5.8.8 is highly recommended. 5.6.1 can work, but it is rather unstable. Can't really comment on what runs best for other environm

Re: test=none

> > Some messages here get tests=none. The two conditions I've found here > are 1) like Matt already mentioned, a timeout in communication using > spamc, or 2) the message was received totally within our network > (trusted/internal). > > Perhaps maybe you don't have the trusted/internal networks s

Re: Tag Level for spam

Martin Hochreiter schrieb: Hi! Hello! Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail as spam? perhaps the default is recommended? (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) I think that ... strongly depends. e.g.: What rules you use, which blacklist

Re: test=none

On Tue, 15 May 2007, Mark Martinec wrote: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none] What does "tests=[none]" mean? Matt Kettler wrote: That's generated by amavis, not spamassassin. My guess, based on my limited knowledge of amavis, is that message means one of the following: Ama

Re: test=none

> Actually the "[none]" comes directly from SpamAssassin, amavisd just > reports what it gets after calling SA. > > The relevant code is in SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm, sub _get_tag: > > TESTSSCORES => sub { > my $arg = (shift || ","); > my $line = ''; > foreach my $test (so

Re: test=none

> > No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none] > > What does "tests=[none]" mean? Matt Kettler wrote: > That's generated by amavis, not spamassassin. > My guess, based on my limited knowledge of amavis, is that message means > one of the following: > Amavis did run the message through

Tag Level for spam

Hi! Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail as spam? (I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin) lg martin

Re: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?

ip guy wrote: > Hi all > > Anyone know why see "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?" in the > email header after delivery and spam scanning ? > > My local.cf file looks like this > > required_score 8.0 > report_safe 1 > rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* Do you use spamc?

Re: test=none

Martin Hochreiter wrote: > Hi! > > I am using spamassassin with amavis. > > I sometimes get mails (Spam Mails) - not tagged with ***SPAM*** > but tagged with the following header: > > No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none] > > What does "tests=[none]" mean? > That's generated b

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

Resolved :) Thanks. On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:47 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok - not the same problem I have > > is -100 too high for you ? > > --[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit : > >>I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I > noticed a email this mornin

no loaded plugin implements

Hello, I just got finished the install from here: http://www.flakshack.com/anti-spam/wiki/index.php . When i start amavis in debug mode and it runs through its check I get the following error: ### May 14 21:29:21 MARTINI.happynetworks.net /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[23697]

Re: SA and Amavisd-new 2.5.0

Jerry, > I understand they're not true virus files, but the default value of > 0.1 is way low and was causing them to be passed on to users. It > seems the SA rules to catch these should be in the standard set. Release notes suggest a set of SA rules to match these. Although high scores can be

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

It wouldn't be if we had any user whitelists set up ! Thats the problem. This is a vanilla installation and we have no individual user preferences setup. All is controlled by a single account, as the mail is then passed onto a Notes server. I have looked at that rule and can see that it uses

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

ok - not the same problem I have is -100 too high for you ? --[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit : I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I noticed a email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender domain, so looked at how it had been scored and noticed that th

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I noticed a email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender domain, so looked at how it had been scored and noticed that the rule USER_IN_WHITELIST had been hit with a -100. On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:35 +0200,

Re: USER_IN_WHITELIST

--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit : Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ? Hi, Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin. There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf BUT it's better

USER_IN_WHITELIST

Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ? -- --[ UxBoD ]-- // PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8 // Keyserv