spamassassin should check that envelope have valid mx olso not just say if
missing a record in dns :(
postfix have the same error with reject_unknown_sender_domain
take care, as long as the from can be bounced its ok
--
This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails.
Hi!
Can somebody give me a hint, why these mails (see below) are not tested?
(Some of the mail sender are whitelisted, but many of them are just not
tested)
lg
Martin
---
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type:
N.B. IMAGESHACK_URI is a rule of my own... What I want to know is why
does spamassassin match with the ZMIde_* rules - whereas spamc doesn't.
I'm using gentoo and have installed spamassassin 3.1.8 and RulesDuJour.
I've run sa-update.
--
$ spamassassin spkeluation.eml | grep -A2 'X-Spam-Status'
Matt Kettler wrote:
Alexander Shikoff wrote:
I get an error when trying to remove an address from AWL:
# spamassassin -x --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[85023] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: Out of
memory during ridiculously large request at
Hi,
I had Justin's VBounce ruleset working fine until I switched to 3.2.0 and I
seem to have bounce messages coming through again. I've checked that
spamassassin is loading the plugin and it is, but testing with both a genuine
bounce (I've commented out the whitelist_bounce_relays entries from
Steve wrote:
N.B. IMAGESHACK_URI is a rule of my own... What I want to know is why
does spamassassin match with the ZMIde_* rules - whereas spamc doesn't.
I'm using gentoo and have installed spamassassin 3.1.8 and RulesDuJour.
I've run sa-update.
--
$ spamassassin spkeluation.eml | grep
Matt Kettler wrote:
Did you restart spamd after adding the ZMIde_* rules?
Spamd won't re-parse files in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
I hadn't just added the ZMIde_* rules - but, just to be sure, I checked:
--
$ su
Password:
# /etc/init.d/spamd restart
* Stopping spamd
...
Steve wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Did you restart spamd after adding the ZMIde_* rules?
Spamd won't re-parse files in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
I hadn't just added the ZMIde_* rules - but, just to be sure, I checked:
--
$ su
Password:
# /etc/init.d/spamd restart
* Stopping
Steve wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Did you restart spamd after adding the ZMIde_* rules?
Spamd won't re-parse files in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
I hadn't just added the ZMIde_* rules - but, just to be sure, I checked:
I don't think that explains things...
Also, where are the
Matt Kettler wrote:
Interesting.. What parameters are being passed to spamd on startup?
Any chance there's a --siteconfigpath option in there?
I'm using a vanilla gentoo install for the start scripts... I changed
-m 5 for -m 1 because I don't have much RAM and I'm happy for
messages to wait in
If you built clamav with optional zoo or unzoo depencencies, you may
wish to remove unzoo (not maintained anymore) and at least patch zoo.
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=522
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Join SECNAP at SFTA Ft. Lauderdate, FL May 31
Free event
At 01:00 26-05-2007, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
Can somebody give me a hint, why these mails (see below) are not tested?
(Some of the mail sender are whitelisted, but many of them are just
not tested)
[snip]
TYCHE ENERGY
KURZEL: T2Y.F
KURZEL: T2Y.F
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200705.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ups, sorry I didn't read that one
I believe I mentioned in a post earlier that my ISP/DSL provider, Embarq, quit
their contract with Earthlink and chose Synacor to provide mail service or so
I think. What I received from one of their QA guys says this:
The Embarq side handles anything that is email client, browser or line
Chris wrote:
Old-X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.351 tagged_above=-10 required=10
tests=[ADVANCE_FEE_1=0, ADVANCE_FEE_2=1.392, ADVANCE_FEE_3=3.336,
ADVANCE_FEE_4=3.727, ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_60=1,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.708,
On Saturday 26 May 2007 10:31 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
Chris wrote:
Old-X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.351 tagged_above=-10 required=10
tests=[ADVANCE_FEE_1=0, ADVANCE_FEE_2=1.392, ADVANCE_FEE_3=3.336,
ADVANCE_FEE_4=3.727, ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_60=1,
At 20:01 26-05-2007, Chris wrote:
I believe I mentioned in a post earlier that my ISP/DSL provider,
Embarq, quit
their contract with Earthlink and chose Synacor to provide mail service or so
I think. What I received from one of their QA guys says this:
[snip]
Synacor raised the required
17 matches
Mail list logo