Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?

guenther skrev: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote: Anyone else getting 404 errors from RDJ lately? Yes, this topic came up just a few hours ago. Probably a dDOS attack. Please disable all RDJ till further notice. guenther Now it's at least partly working, I stil

BAYES_99 issue: spamd using info for nobody, not given spamc user

Howdy -- I've seen a few mentions of BAYES_99 problems on the list over the past month or two, but nothing that reflects what I discovered was going on tonight on my system; I'm hoping someone can help! The executive summary is that every message on my system was hitting BAYES_99, and I de

Re: Problems with Received: header checks and ALL_TRUSTED rule...

Anthony Kamau wrote: 3/ if exchange is configured to send a copy of received email to an external account OR the message is destined for a non-existent mailbox, exchange will initiate a connection with sendmail either for forwarding mail or for NDR 4/ since the exchange box is now trusted via m

RE: Problems with Received: header checks and ALL_TRUSTED rule...

Thanks Robert. And you are correct - the exchange rejects mail destined to non-existent mailboxes! Due to lack of time, I have not yet found a quick method to have sendmail authenticate against active directory so I've instructed sendmail to relay all mail and leave it to exchange to deal with re

RE: Problems with Received: header checks and ALL_TRUSTED rule...

> > I've just discovered something rather interesting after I enabled the > msa_networks feature in local.cf. What's happening is this: > > 1/ spam arrives at the sendmail box from someone who has used a > non-existent email address in our domain > > 2/ spamassassin clearly marks this as spam,

RE: Problems with Received: header checks and ALL_TRUSTED rule...

Hey Daryl, et al, I've just discovered something rather interesting after I enabled the msa_networks feature in local.cf. What's happening is this: 1/ spam arrives at the sendmail box from someone who has used a non-existent email address in our domain 2/ spamassassin clearly marks this as spam

Re: 3.2.1 install failure

On Wednesday 13 June 2007 12:55 pm, Chris wrote: > > I've always installed with CPAN via webmin, guess I'll have to download and > read the cpan man pages to see how to install as non-root user > > Thanks > Chris Never mind, my pain drugs are working too hard, I just downloaded the source, ran

Re: Status of Spamassassin

From: "Dallas Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Doctor wrote: Cans rules_du_jour work? Still getting a no update state. SARE is back up (knock on wood). Delete your .cf files and re-run RDJ... That appears to be the only way to make it work. The -N option on wget, which actually redu

Re: SA 3.2.1 on OS X

Jerry Durand wrote: Good news, I can send/receive mail with 3.2.1 installed. Had a slight panic, I forgot to do the second install and got the message I was using the 3.002000 script with 3.002001. Fixed that. Now I see the list is being tagged again as junk mail. I think there was a messa

SA 3.2.1 on OS X

Good news, I can send/receive mail with 3.2.1 installed. Had a slight panic, I forgot to do the second install and got the message I was using the 3.002000 script with 3.002001. Fixed that. Now I see the list is being tagged again as junk mail. I think there was a message about whitelists

Fine-tuning bayes

I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.7 as an individual user. I carefully sa-learn all spam (and all ham with a bayes score over 0), and it's rather good now, but it's not perfect. I have an idea, and I'd like to bounce it off the community to see if it makes sense. I have various filters in procmail

Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1

> > > +.if ${ARCH} == "i386" > > > +.endif > > Please don't do that! > > Both of the following cc commands need option -fPIC in order > to be able to build a shareable library: > > gcc -fPIC -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE spamc/libspamc.c > spamc/utils.c -o spamc/libspamc.so -shared

Re: Missing rule? AND I've updated my SUSE builds

Anders Norrbring wrote: > I just noticed this in my lint; > > [3425] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule SARE_GIF_STOX > > And I can't find the source for the SARE_GIF_STOX rule, any hints please? /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf $ head /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare

RE: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1

> -Original Message- > From: Jack L. Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:29 AM > To: Michael Scheidell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1 > > At 10:47 PM 6.12.2007 -0400, Micha

RE: Error on startup after upgrade to 3.2.1:CompiledRegexps

> From: Steven W. Orr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm > Preparing... ### > [100%] > 1:perl-Mail-Spa

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available

Jake Richter richterscale.org> writes: > Is the workaround y'all are suggesting that the SA make be done as a non-root > user, but the install be done as root in my situation? >[snip] To answer my own question: Yes. This works fine. Jake

Error on startup after upgrade to 3.2.1:CompiledRegexps

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.1-1.i386.rpm Preparing...### [100%] 1:perl-Mail-SpamAssassin

R: R: new system

> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Vincent Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > > > > >> -Messaggio originale- > >> Da: Vincent Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Jerry Durand wrote: > >> > >>> Sometime later this s

"make test" dnsbl tests sporadically fail

When I run "make test" for v3.2.1, why do some of the dnsbl tests sporadically fail? For instance: t/dnsbl.Not found: P_2 = [127.0.0.4] # Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 Not found: P_7 = # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 635 fail #2 N

Re: 3.2.1 install failure

Chris-394 wrote: > > For the first time ever I've had a failure with an SA install. I've > actually > no clue what the problem could be, the output of 'make test' can be found > here http://mediasafe.embarq.com/chris1948/Hosted/SAfailed.txt if someone > would be so kind as to look at it and h

Re: v3.2.1 gives "spamd: handle_user unable to find user:"

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1 running on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.004) I've started seeing the "spamd: handle_user unable to find user:" message in the spamd log file. This was not happening in v3.2.0. We are sta

Re: R: new system

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: -Messaggio originale- Da: Vincent Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Jerry Durand wrote: Sometime later this summer I'm going to be replacing our server. It's currently a Mac (1.42GHz G4) running OS X Server. Since th

Re: R: new system

At 01:12 PM 6/13/2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Just to know, what's the matter with installing amavisd-new on MacOS X? Nothing if you follow the tutorial at TopicDesk.com , OS X Server has an old version of amavisd-new, you need to install a second copy and change operation over to that.

Re: new system

At 01:03 PM 6/13/2007, Vincent Li wrote: I have OS X Server running email server too, To save the headache of replacing this OS X server, moving mail boxes, reducing the memory load...You can run Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin on a seperate Linux box and let Postfix on OS X talk to Amavisd-new on th

R: new system

> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Vincent Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Jerry Durand wrote: > > > Sometime later this summer I'm going to be replacing our server. > It's > > currently a Mac (1.42GHz G4) running OS X Server. Since the mail > server part > > of OS X "n

v3.2.1 gives "spamd: handle_user unable to find user:"

SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.1 running on Perl 5.8.8 with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.004) I've started seeing the "spamd: handle_user unable to find user:" message in the spamd log file. This was not happening in v3.2.0. We are starting spamd with this command: spamd -d -u s

Re: new system

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Jerry Durand wrote: Sometime later this summer I'm going to be replacing our server. It's currently a Mac (1.42GHz G4) running OS X Server. Since the mail server part of OS X "needs work", I'm thinking of just replacing this with an Intel/AMD based Linux box. I'm consid

new system

Sometime later this summer I'm going to be replacing our server. It's currently a Mac (1.42GHz G4) running OS X Server. Since the mail server part of OS X "needs work", I'm thinking of just replacing this with an Intel/AMD based Linux box. I'm considering Ubuntu, any suggestions/warnings/pan

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

OK, got the picture. Guess I'll go for the upgrade of postfix. Thanks again, Luis 2007/6/13, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: > OK, Daryl, got the point. Made a rule to match my Postfix-2.2 auth > headers. Now, a question: how do I assign a score of zero to SPF

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: OK, Daryl, got the point. Made a rule to match my Postfix-2.2 auth headers. Now, a question: how do I assign a score of zero to SPF_FAIL (in order to disable that rule) if my custom rule matches? I guess it's via a META rule, but I can't get it working... Based on the r

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

OK, Daryl, got the point. Made a rule to match my Postfix-2.2 auth headers. Now, a question: how do I assign a score of zero to SPF_FAIL (in order to disable that rule) if my custom rule matches? I guess it's via a META rule, but I can't get it working... Based on the rule published at SA's Wiki,

Re: CPAN mirror delay

At 11:32 AM 6/13/2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: No problem, just wait until I start hitting you up for DMX hardware tips and tricks. :) Currently fighting with a project I bid low since it would be simple (we've all done that). DMX in, dual stepping motors out (color and dowser for a buil

Re: CPAN mirror delay

Jerry Durand wrote: Thanks, and thanks for all the hard work! No problem, just wait until I start hitting you up for DMX hardware tips and tricks. :) Daryl

Re: [Maybe OT] how do I avoid SPF_FAIL?

Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: Hi, list, I've recently added the feature of SMTP Auth to my MTA (Postfix running on Debian Sarge), and when any user tries to send a mail trhoug the server, it hits SPF_FAIL (which, on the other hand, seems natural, since one of the "relays" sits outside of the mynetwor

Re: SASL and SPF Fail

Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: Hi, list, several of my users are beggining to use the SASL method to send mails trhough the server. The point is that the messages from one of these users are getting tagged as spam (the lil' bastard uses Incredimail, so a bunch of another stuff regardind this crappy pi

Re: CPAN mirror delay

At 11:15 AM 6/13/2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Some mirrors appear to have a sync interval of 24 hours. Which is semi-reasonable given that it can take upwards of 8 hours for an uploaded module to appear anywhere in CPAN. Daryl Thanks, and thanks for all the hard work! -- Jerry Durand,

Re: CPAN mirror delay

Jerry Durand wrote: I was wondering how long CPAN takes to update its mirrors? I just checked and Mail::SpamAssassin is still 3.2.0 from whatever mirror we're going to. Some mirrors appear to have a sync interval of 24 hours. Which is semi-reasonable given that it can take upwards of 8 hour

[Maybe OT] how do I avoid SPF_FAIL?

Hi, list, I've recently added the feature of SMTP Auth to my MTA (Postfix running on Debian Sarge), and when any user tries to send a mail trhoug the server, it hits SPF_FAIL (which, on the other hand, seems natural, since one of the "relays" sits outside of the mynetworks directive of Postfix. Is

Re: 3.2.1 install failure

On Wednesday 13 June 2007 10:27 am, Randal, Phil wrote: > This has been covered on the list already. > > Try building at as a non-root user. > > Cheers, > > Phil > > -- > Phil Randal > Network Engineer > Herefordshire Council > Hereford, UK > I've always installed with CPAN via webmin, guess I'll h

Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1

> > > I am using FBSD-6.2 amd64 and ran into this problem when running make: > > > bunch of other stuff all okay > > > stopped here: > > > Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3 > > > make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so > > > gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ma

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available

On Wed, June 13, 2007 9:38 am, Jake Richter wrote: > Is the workaround y'all are suggesting that the SA make be done as a > non-root > user, but the install be done as root in my situation? > > In other words, > > As non-root user: > > perl Makefile.PL > make > make test > > As root: >

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.1 available

Daniel J McDonald austinenergy.com> writes: > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:07 -0400, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > > > From: Duncan Hill [mailto:spamassassin cricalix.net] > > > > > > On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote: > > > > Daniel J McDonald writes: > > > >> So, you can't build t

Re: emails to non existent recipients -- netzero.com fixed this problem?

Hi Mike, At 08:50 13-06-2007, Mike Kenny wrote: we weren't sending anything. We are an ISP providing email services to a large number of users in South Africa. Some of these users may have: mis-remembered an email mis-typed an email sent to an acquaintance who had changed email provide (maybe

Missing rule? AND I've updated my SUSE builds

I just noticed this in my lint; [3425] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule SARE_GIF_STOX And I can't find the source for the SARE_GIF_STOX rule, any hints please? Also, I've updated my SUSE builds to SpamAssassin 3.2.1 for SUSE 10.1 and 10.2, found at ftp://ftp.norrbring.com

Re: emails to non existent recipients -- netzero.com fixed this problem?

On 6/13/07, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Were you sending mail to non-existent accounts or doing sender validation? we weren't sending anything. We are an ISP providing email services to a large number of users in South Africa. Some of these users may have: mis-remembered an email mis-typ

RE: 3.2.1 install failure

Chris Don't compile as root and you'll be fine - already been raised as a bug. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 > -Original Message- > From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 June 2007 15:46 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.or

RE: 3.2.1 install failure

This has been covered on the list already. Try building at as a non-root user. Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Original Message- > From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 June 2007 15:46 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org

Re: emails to non existent recipients -- netzero.com fixed this problem?

At 02:57 13-06-2007, Mike Kenny wrote: On a related topic, netzero.com has been refusing connections from our SMTP servers. When I queried them the response I got was: have been blocked because we detected probe attempts. Activities like sending mail to non-existent accoun

3.2.1 install failure

For the first time ever I've had a failure with an SA install. I've actually no clue what the problem could be, the output of 'make test' can be found here http://mediasafe.embarq.com/chris1948/Hosted/SAfailed.txt if someone would be so kind as to look at it and help me see what the issues might

Re: emails to non existent recipients -- netzero.com fixed this problem?

>> >> On a related topic, netzero.com has been refusing connections from our SMTP >> servers. When I queried them the response I got was: >> >> have been blocked because we detected probe attempts. Activities like >> sending mail to non-existent accounts or empty connections would qualify as >> a

Re: Status of Spamassassin

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:51:55AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote: > The Doctor wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:30:10AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote: > > > >>The Doctor wrote: > >> > >>>Cans rules_du_jour work? > >>> > >>> > >>>Still getting a no update state. > >>> > >>> > >>SARE i

Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1

Michael, > > I am using FBSD-6.2 amd64 and ran into this problem when running make: > > bunch of other stuff all okay > > stopped here: > > Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3 > > make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so > > gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach

SASL and SPF Fail

Hi, list, several of my users are beggining to use the SASL method to send mails trhough the server. The point is that the messages from one of these users are getting tagged as spam (the lil' bastard uses Incredimail, so a bunch of another stuff regardind this crappy piece of software gets his me

Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1

Jack L. Stone wrote: At 10:47 PM 6.12.2007 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3.2.1 portfile, you can download it here: http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa321.tgz Instructions: rm everything in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin, untar above t

RE: Connection wont close

Hi all, after upgrading to 3.2 I think I discovered my problem- it appears that the connections don't disconnect , here's the output I'd say about 95% of these are port 783 103 CLOSE_WAIT 27 ESTABLISHED 19 FIN_WAIT_1 78 FIN_WAIT_2 3 LAST_ACK 5 LISTEN 8 TIME_WAIT Is there somet

CPAN mirror delay

I was wondering how long CPAN takes to update its mirrors? I just checked and Mail::SpamAssassin is still 3.2.0 from whatever mirror we're going to. cpan[1]> look Mail::SpamAssassin CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.13) Going to read /private/var/root/.cpan/Metadata Database was generated on Tu

Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1

At 10:47 PM 6.12.2007 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: >If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3.2.1 portfile, you >can download it here: > >http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa321.tgz > >Instructions: rm everything in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin, >untar above there, make or portup

Re: [OT] RDJ RulesDuJour Updates dont lint

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: coupon1+coupon2+style1+style2;document.cookie="NSC_DOSP="+add+";path=/";window.location=window.location.href;window.focus(); [18730] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:

Re: DNS tests getting aborted

> Actually my DNS is working fine. Other DNS rulesets are hitting fine > like RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET > > In order to get URI tests working I have to put rbl_timeout 40 in my > local.cf > The default rbl_timeout of 15 is too less, but that is strange. It had > been working with my older SA 3.1.5 tho

Connection wont close

Hi all, after upgrading to 3.2 I think I discovered my problem- it appears that the connections don't disconnect , here's the output I'd say about 95% of these are port 783 103 CLOSE_WAIT 27 ESTABLISHED 19 FIN_WAIT_1 78 FIN_WAIT_2 3 LAST_ACK 5 LISTEN 8 TIME_WAIT Is there somethi

Re: Rejecting spam during SMTP session

Sorry. I should have been a little more elaborate. The message you posted yesterday had two responses. Both pretty much were in agreement the .qmail file handles messages after the SMTP session. One of the responses mentioned using qmail-scanner. On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Hendrik Helmvoigt wrote:

Re: DCC and Razor

Chuck Payne schrieb: Hi, When I first got spamassassin working, I had dcc and razor, but some where a long the way, they have stop scanning. I am currently running... SpamAssassin Server version 3.1.8 � running on Perl 5.8.7 � with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 0.97) I know that ddcifd is r

Re: DNS tests getting aborted

On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:34 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:48:04PM +0530, ram wrote: > > [8454] dbg: dns: success for 0 of 29 queries > > [8454] dbg: dns: timeout for after 10 seconds > > > > but dig on the machine is working fine without any issues. > > my user_prefs

Re: Status of Spamassassin

The Doctor wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:30:10AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote: The Doctor wrote: Cans rules_du_jour work? Still getting a no update state. SARE is back up (knock on wood). Delete your .cf files and re-run RDJ... -- Dallas Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Status of Spamassassin

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:30:10AM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote: > The Doctor wrote: > >Cans rules_du_jour work? > > > > > >Still getting a no update state. > > > > SARE is back up (knock on wood). Delete your .cf files and re-run RDJ... > > -- > Dallas Engelken > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://u

Re: Rejecting spam during SMTP session

Deja-Vu. On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Hendrik Helmvoigt wrote: Hi, for a while i've been watching my spamassassin perform great on almost all spam - i've never had any false positives and also a very low count of false negatives. So I thought about rejecting sure spam during the SMTP session and ca

Re: Status of Spamassassin

The Doctor wrote: Cans rules_du_jour work? Still getting a no update state. SARE is back up (knock on wood). Delete your .cf files and re-run RDJ... -- Dallas Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://uribl.com

Status of Spamassassin

Cans rules_du_jour work? Still getting a no update state. -- Member - Liberal International This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED] God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! PAtriots! MAke your declaration of loyalty! -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dan

Rejecting spam during SMTP session

Hi, for a while i've been watching my spamassassin perform great on almost all spam - i've never had any false positives and also a very low count of false negatives. So I thought about rejecting sure spam during the SMTP session and came up with a few bits of shellscript code thats rejecting

DCC and Razor

Hi, When I first got spamassassin working, I had dcc and razor, but some where a long the way, they have stop scanning. I am currently running... SpamAssassin Server version 3.1.8 � running on Perl 5.8.7 � with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 0.97) I know that ddcifd is running, because if I do

RE: emails to non existent recipients -- netzero.com fixed this problem?

Some would consider 'address verification', ie connecting and doing an rcpt to then dropping a DHA. Its bad practice, because someone can 'spam you' from forged netzero (aol, yahoo, etc) accounts, and if you do a address verification on them, you, and the billion others who decided to do that al

Re: emails to non existent recipients -- netzero.com fixed this problem?

On a related topic, netzero.com has been refusing connections from our SMTP servers. When I queried them the response I got was: have been blocked because we detected probe attempts. Activities like sending mail to non-existent accounts or empty connections would qualify as a "dictionary search"

Re: AW: Looks like image spam is coming back (fuzzyocr useless in this situation)

Ove, could you please do me a favor and confirm that the one I have at http://www.anfitrion.net/MvPmAyp9yb.gif is also blocked? If you want, I can send an email to you with the gif attached to it. If it works for you, then the problem lays with the applications I use with FuzzyOCR to handle those g

AW: Looks like image spam is coming back (fuzzyocr useless in this situation)

we also get many of these and FuzzyOcr is doing a good job here: Inhaltsanalyse im Detail: (13.3 Punkte, 5.0 benötigt) Pkte Regelname Beschreibung -- -- 1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Unnötige Parameter in "Conte

Re: Looks like image spam is coming back (fuzzyocr useless in this situation)

On Wed, June 13, 2007 10:08, Oenus Tech Services wrote: > I'm thinking of disabling fuzzyocr for the time being until the problem > is solved. However, fuzzyocr is still doing a good job on other files. Does > anybody have > a suggestion or clue on how to solve this? Is there a way for fuzzyocr t

Re: These are getting through SA...

Phil, > What happens if Botnet is patched to use Mail::SpamAssassin::DnsResolver > instead of Net::DNS::Resolver? > I'm musuing about Net::DNS::Resolver's default timeouts and retries... > Phil (probably barking up the wrong tree) It would do good if Botnet would impose a time limit on its DNS qu

Looks like image spam is coming back (fuzzyocr useless in this situation)

Some weeks ago I posted a message about fuzzyocr not scoring a spam contents gif file with a broken frame. I got confirmation in the list from Keith De Souza being able to reproduce the problem. Well, it looks like spammers have found their way to deal with fuzzyocr. These days we're getting more a

Re: No buffer space available

> >> spamd[46771]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases > >> /usr/local/share/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: No buffer space > >> available > That wouldn't be TCP buffers. It's doing file I/O not network I/O. > Since it's file buffers, which on nearly every OS are dynamic, it > implies Mike'

RE: emails to non existent recipients -- forward to spam honey pot.

>> =20 >> Very interesting question !=20 >> >> I don't have any idea about how to do this but I'm interested in answers = >> too >> ! :-) >> >> -Message d'origine- >> De : mbano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Envoy=E9 : mardi 12 juin 2007 19:03 >> =C0 : users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Obje

Re: Errors in logs after upgrade from debian sarge to etch

Ok, I saw the upgrade file. I've done quite a bit of modifications on the local.cf file. But I still get a bunch of errors when restarting spamd. Any help ? Le mardi 12 juin 2007 à 21:06 +0200, LESOUEF Emmanuel a écrit : > Hello, > > After upgrading SA from 3.0 to 3.1, I get the attached logs

RE: These are getting through SA...

What happens if Botnet is patched to use Mail::SpamAssassin::DnsResolver instead of Net::DNS::Resolver? I'm musuing about Net::DNS::Resolver's default timeouts and retries... Phil (probably barking up the wrong tree) -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Ori

Re: [OT] RDJ RulesDuJour Updates dont lint

Hi! /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/sa-blacklist.current.2; mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/blacklist.cf.20070613-0836 /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf; mv -f coupon1+coupon2+style1+style2

[OT] RDJ RulesDuJour Updates dont lint

/tripwire.cf.20070613-0836 /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/sa-blacklist.current.2; mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/blacklist.cf.20070613-0836 /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf; mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin

Re: How to decrease the bayes database size

Stéphane LEPREVOST wrote: Thanks Theo for these usefull answers. As we're using auto_learn and never use sa-learn by hand, is there a more particular risk if we simply delete the file ? Here's the configuration we use about Bayes : use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 -Messa

RE: Problems with Received: header checks and ALL_TRUSTED rule...

Thanks a ton Daryl. I've patched my SA 3.1.7 per [1] and it is working as expected. Cheers, AK. -Original Message- From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2007 4:15 PM To: Anthony Kamau Cc: SpamAssassin Mailing List Subject: Re: Problems with Receiv

RE: emails to non existent recipients -- forward to spam honey pot.

Very interesting question ! I don't have any idea about how to do this but I'm interested in answers too ! :-) -Message d'origine- De : mbano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2007 19:03 À : users@spamassassin.apache.org Objet : emails to non existent recipients -- forw

RE: How to decrease the bayes database size

Thanks Theo for these usefull answers. As we're using auto_learn and never use sa-learn by hand, is there a more particular risk if we simply delete the file ? Here's the configuration we use about Bayes : use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 -Message d'origine- De : Theo