[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> I add this lines in user_prefs:
>>>
>>> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
>>> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
>>> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
>>> add_header all Tests _TESTS_
>>> add_hea
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> I add this lines in user_prefs:
>>
>> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
>> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
>> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
>> add_header all Tests _TESTS_
>> add_header all Autolearn _AUTOLEARN_ \n Version=_V
--
"Man, this is such a trip"
-Dan Mahoney, October 25, 1997
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I add this lines in user_prefs:
>
> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
> add_header all Tests _TESTS_
> add_header all Autolearn _AUTOLEARN_ \n Version=_VERSION_
> a
I am using spamassassin version:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
I am trying to use the add_header to add more information to the message
header. I added in the /home/qscand/.spamassassin/user_prefs the following
lines:
clear_headers
add_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_
add
I am trying to change the score in which email is marked as spam for specific
users. I found where you can set the threshold in maia mailguard so that
email coming in is marked as spam. It seems that this does not change
accounts that are already active, only newly created accounts. So what I
w
hi all,
I add this lines in user_prefs:
add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
add_header all Tests _TESTS_
add_header all Autolearn _AUTOLEARN_ \n Version=_VERSION_
add_header all Checker-Version SpamAssassin
Hello
This is my first post to the list, and I have following problem: I run
spamd (3.2.3) under quite heavy load, on a dedicated machine (debian
etch). Once in about hour the load of the machine skyrockets to about
100 and then it hangs there until I restart the exim MTA that talks to
it. What is
Mark Rigby-Jones wrote:
On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:40, Steven Stern wrote:
Have you tried running a local caching name server? That can cut down
on times to do repetitive name lookups.
Yes indeed, it's something we've always had on mail servers even before
we had SpamAssassin, for exactly that rea
> Philipp Snizek wrote:
>> You use Bayes?
>> Have you tried turning off auto_expire? From my expierence this can
>> cause
>> significant performance issues.
>>
> It shouldn't cause performance issues. It should only cause, at worst,
> one message every 12 hours or so to take a long time (ie: 10 min
Philipp Snizek wrote:
> You use Bayes?
> Have you tried turning off auto_expire? From my expierence this can cause
> significant performance issues.
>
It shouldn't cause performance issues. It should only cause, at worst,
one message every 12 hours or so to take a long time (ie: 10 minutes).
Un
would perhaps be useful to see a spamassassin -D --lint ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749
You use Bayes?
Have you tried turning off auto_expire? From my expierence this can cause
significant performance issues.
Moreover, have you tried turning off bayes? without bayes scanning too a
quarter of a second per email on a 2cpu, 8GB standard i686 arch, sa
compiled as 32-bit app.
Philipp
> On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:40, Steven Stern wrote:
> >Have you tried running a local caching name server? That can cut
> >down on times to do repetitive name lookups.
On 09.12.07 21:58, Mark Rigby-Jones wrote:
> Yes indeed, it's something we've always had on mail servers even
> before we had SpamA
On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:40, Steven Stern wrote:
Have you tried running a local caching name server? That can cut
down on times to do repetitive name lookups.
Yes indeed, it's something we've always had on mail servers even
before we had SpamAssassin, for exactly that reason.
Thanks,
mrj
--
M
15 matches
Mail list logo
