From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 21:03
Gene Heskett sez:
running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
I'm close enough to Gene's age and have known him long enough I get
the right to rap his knuck
On Saturday 09 February 2008, John Hardin wrote:
>Gene Heskett sez:
>> running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
>
>There's no fool like an old fool.
And that's why they pay me the big bucks when something really goes aglay at
the tv station even if I have been semi-retire
Gene Heskett sez:
>
> running as root since RH5.1. Yeah, I'm an un-repentant old fart.
There's no fool like an old fool.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
On Friday 08 February 2008, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 16:43
>
>> On Friday 08 February 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>>On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
The command that kmail issues to it is:
sa-learn -
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 2008, February 08 16:43
On Friday 08 February 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
The command that kmail issues to it is:
sa-learn --ham /root/Mail/(foldername)/cur
You're not using
Please, resist the urge to top post and including unnecessary full
quotes. This also makes answering questions much easier...
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 16:45 -0800, fchan wrote:
> Thank you. I have check my DNS and it appears to resolve the link
> correctly.
What link? The spample does not show any
Thank you. I have check my DNS and it appears to resolve the link
correctly. It is just annoying, I think less than 1% of all messages,
are getting this and I'm checking if there is something I can do to
solve this.
Here is a sample message that is causing this:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 08 February 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> The sa-learn --spam can process a message in 5 to 10 seconds or so, so if
>> I've dropped 20 doofus mails in the spam directory and fire it off, I have
>> it done and kmail is back amon
Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM wrote:
Can you point me to a good regex tutorial? The one I have found has
given me a lot of good starting stuff, but it doesn't mention the ?:,
and I'd like to learn more.
?: is a Perl extension that disables generating a back reference..
normally anything
A weird thing has started within the last couple of days. It is only
affecting mail received from the SA users mail list and only to mail
received from Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The messages have a "To" header like this:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Users !Can.gregorie.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 02:02:45PM +0100, Paolo Cravero wrote:
> Arthur Dent wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... Not delete exactly, but the sa-learn job take so long that the
>> archivemail job has kicked off and finds the "TempSpam" and "TempHam" mboxes
>> in the Mail directory and dutifully chops out anything o
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 01:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The sa-learn --spam can process a message in 5 to 10 seconds or so, so if
> I've
> dropped 20 doofus mails in the spam directory and fire it off, I have it done
> and kmail is back among the living in 2-3 minutes.
This seems *way* too hig
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 11:03 -0800, Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM
wrote:
> Can you point me to a good regex tutorial?
Have you tried `perldoc perlretut` ?
> The one I have found has
> given me a lot of good starting stuff, but it doesn't mention the ?:,
> and I'd like to learn more.
f
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:03:26AM -0800, Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM
wrote:
> Can you point me to a good regex tutorial? The one I have found has
> given me a lot of good starting stuff, but it doesn't mention the ?:,
> and I'd like to learn more.
$ perldoc perlre
--
Randomly Select
Can you point me to a good regex tutorial? The one I have found has
given me a lot of good starting stuff, but it doesn't mention the ?:,
and I'd like to learn more.
--Thanks.
Matt Kettler wrote:
The regex for the rule is:
/\bfree (?:porn|xxx|adult)/i
--
Paul Douglas Franklin
Computer Manag
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Paolo Cravero wrote:
Don't forget that sa-learn remembers which messages have been learned.
Once your old messages have all been learned, you need to feed to it
only new arrivals, that is since the last sa-learn run. No need to keep
180 days worth of ham and spam in the tem
HI, i've the same problem...if you have solved this please contact me!!
Bye Upr.
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a MX running SpamAssassin and Exim that sends e-mails for another
> server runnning Exim where is configurated the user accounts. I'm
> trying to define t
Arthur Dent wrote:
Hmmm... Not delete exactly, but the sa-learn job take so long that the
archivemail job has kicked off and finds the "TempSpam" and "TempHam" mboxes
in the Mail directory and dutifully chops out anything older than 180 days. I
didn't think that that would be a problem, but mayb
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:51:51 +0100, you wrote:
>Michael W Cocke wrote:
>
>>
>> They use DHCP. Netops has to trace it, and I seem to be about 5Kth on
>> the list.Ironic as hell, considering the effort I put into
>> avoiding MIT netops about 20 years ago.
>
>But you should be able to run tcpdu
19 matches
Mail list logo
