Re: Strange headers on mail from SA users list

2008-02-12 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Martin, This error is simpel... If you for example in mutt write a message and hit for new message you will ask for the "To:" address enter it or use the addressbook and hit . Normaly you will be ask for the "Subject:" and enter it... Now if you do not keep attention and you write somet

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-02-08 01:49:52, schrieb Gene Heskett: > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? I vaguely recall > feeding it my corpus of another folder it was having trouble with a year ago, > the linux-usb lis

[no subject]

2008-02-12 Thread The Doctor
Hmm!! Slight problem! I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file and still there is {spam?} label. What should I be fixing? -- Member - Liberal International This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED] God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! On Mar

Re: upgrading is just like installing

2008-02-12 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 04:25 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing* > KB> special about SA version numbers. > Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file [...] Then stick to the user_prefs file. You do realize there is

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote: On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? Dunno if there ar

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 21:34 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed > > > to > > > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? > > > > Dunno if there are limitati

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:04:28PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Guilty, its all in Mail dir format. --dir ? -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "There are all of these warnings and incantations and unnatural rituals and everything's veiled in this threat of "you mess with the mayo, the mayo mess wit

custom user_prefs file spamc

2008-02-12 Thread Maarten
Hello, I'm setting up a gateway spamfilter mailserver. And I like to be able to give with spamc the path to the user_prefs file for the right domain. So the user does not exists, so I can not use the -U option. I have read this patch http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4405 a

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote: >Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: >> > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed >> > to sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? >> >> Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your

Re: whitelist failure?

2008-02-12 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, The Doctor wrote: Hmm!! Slight problem! I indicated a whtielist_from in the universal configuration file and still there is {spam?} label. What should I be fixing? Your request for help. Please post the whitelist command you added to the configuration file, the name of

RE: upgrading is just like installing

2008-02-12 Thread James E. Pratt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:26 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: upgrading is just like installing KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing* KB> special about SA

Re: Strange headers on mail from SA users list

2008-02-12 Thread Paul Douglas Franklin
Nope. I took a look at my sent box on the Kolab server. The message subject was normal when it left my mailbox. I had hit the reply button for a previous message. I was wondering what could be wrong with my e-mail until others reported that it came through fine to them. I would hate to be a

Re: Bayes - Balance of spam

2008-02-12 Thread Arthur Dent
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:44:58AM -0500, Rob McEwen wrote: > On 12.02.08 13:55, Arthur Dent wrote: >> I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting >> bombarded with Russian spam. It currently outweighs all other spam by >> about 100:1 > Arthur, > > First, make sure that

Re: Bayes - Balance of spam

2008-02-12 Thread Arthur Dent
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:33:47AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Arthur Dent wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes >> works. >> >> I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally >> Bayes works pretty well. >> >>

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed to > > sa-learn --ham and expect it to achieve normal speed? > > Dunno if there are limitations -- however, your 7k messages should be > perfectly fine. Just ran a test

Re: Strange headers on mail from SA users list

2008-02-12 Thread Martin Gregorie
Hi Michelle, > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Users ! > Its possible that, if the To: header line contained a sentence, that Postfix address rewriting will add "@example.com" to every word, fail to find these mailboxes and bounce the message as a result. However, I've found another way to upset Po

Re: Bayes - Balance of spam

2008-02-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.02.08 13:55, Arthur Dent wrote: > Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes > works. > > I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally > Bayes works pretty well. > > I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be g

Re: Bayes - Balance of spam

2008-02-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Arthur Dent wrote: Hello All, Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes works. I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally Bayes works pretty well. I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting bombarded wi

Bayes - Balance of spam

2008-02-12 Thread Arthur Dent
Hello All, Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't fully understand just how Bayes works. I dutifully feed all the spam (and ham) I get into sa-learn and generally Bayes works pretty well. I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting bombarded with Russian spam. It c

Re: upgrading is just like installing

2008-02-12 Thread jidanni
KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing* KB> special about SA version numbers. Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file or instructions for installing non-root. And SA version numbers & aliases often need explaining, just like Debian package version numb

Re: Bayes - Balance of spam

2008-02-12 Thread Rob McEwen
On 12.02.08 13:55, Arthur Dent wrote: I am a little concerned however that at this moment I seem to be getting bombarded with Russian spam. It currently outweighs all other spam by about 100:1 Arthur, First, make sure that you are blocking all mail sent to unknown users (i.e., turn catch-all o

Re: sa-learn --ham ground rules

2008-02-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, John Hardin wrote: >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Sunday 10 February 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote: >>> Am 2008-02-08 20:13:10, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > So what is the maximum number of files in a directory that one can feed > to sa-learn -