On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 17:10 +1300, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are you guys now trying to re-invent the wheel in the special case
of a gray asphalt street? What about a dirt track, grass, and anything
else a wheel works on?
I've
I believe that what you are asking for is
meta RUSSIAN_AND_BADTEXT (CHARSET_FARAWAY __OTHER_RULE)
That requires first that you have set up ok_locales.
--Paul
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which
KB If you want to trigger on Russian only, list all but ru.
What if to catch Ms. Ba'loney Margar'ine, airport security had to keep a
current list of all the other people in the world. So this is the
wrong approach, as we've been thru before. OK, bye.
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 11:04 -0800, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:
I believe that what you are asking for is
meta RUSSIAN_AND_BADTEXT (CHARSET_FARAWAY __OTHER_RULE)
That requires first that you have set up ok_locales.
If you have TextCat enabled, then the X-Language: meta header will be
added
I recently upgraded from v3.1.9 to v3.2.4 and I've noticed a substantial
increase in scan times. The general average scantime with v3.1 was
about 1.2s and now with v3.2 it's about 2.2s. It's enough of a slow
down so that my mail queue backs quite easily now.
So I'm trying to debug SA and
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which is all about
these char sets. No REs, almost no thinking required, no headache. A
single line, and you're done.
What's the best way to test the character set for use in a meta rule? We
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 11:49 -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've pointed it out before. Just use ok_locales, which is all about
these char sets. No REs, almost no thinking required, no headache. A
single line, and you're done.
Sorry for replying to my own topic, but I've figured out what's causing
it to go so slow.
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I'm not sure why it doesn't in 3.2, any
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 04:26 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KB If you want to trigger on Russian only, list all but ru.
What if to catch Ms. Ba'loney Margar'ine, airport security had to keep a
current list of all the other people in the world. So this is the
wrong approach, as we've been thru
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Sean Kennedy wrote:
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I'm not sure why it doesn't in 3.2, any
insight?
Don't use it. It's a huge list of URIs
Hello,
Here is a complete sample without a link (because
apache.org bounced the message due the spam
content) with logs relevant to the message. I
have tar.gz/tgz the message to hopefully pass the
spam filter.
Here is the message:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
Is there any place to easily query whois information to determine on a
mass scale how old a domain is?
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:34:09 -0800
Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any place to easily query whois information to determine on
a mass scale how old a domain is?
Don't know myself. All I can say is don't query whois on Network
Solutions for possible availability of a domain to
Sean Kennedy wrote:
Sorry for replying to my own topic, but I've figured out what's
causing it to go so slow.
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1, I'm not sure why
Quoting Sean Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry for replying to my own topic, but I've figured out what's causing
it to go so slow.
It's the rules in sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf from
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.uri.cf.
This ruleset works fine in 3.1,
15 matches
Mail list logo