I'm looking for people to have a look over these spams and give me some
ideas of some possible areas for improvement (either score adjustments,
configuration tweaks, plugins that I should try, etc.).
The spams can be pulled from here: http://micah.riseup.net/spams
It appears to me you have just
On 23/02/2008 9:46 AM, Mike wrote:
> A clue perhaps is that for some reason the default config file
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is being read despite the use of -C. (I
> know this since it has custom rules not present in the config I am using
> to test the mysql userprefs).
I'd resolve the t
On 23/02/2008 8:34 PM, giga328 wrote:
> I'm testing SpamAssassin and I'm getting false positives. Both tests
> ALL_TRUSTED and DOS_OE_TO_MX are firing for emails sent by Outlook Express
> for local clients and it seems like I have something wrong in *_networks.
> Here is my setup:
> All my servers
I'm testing SpamAssassin and I'm getting false positives. Both tests
ALL_TRUSTED and DOS_OE_TO_MX are firing for emails sent by Outlook Express
for local clients and it seems like I have something wrong in *_networks.
Here is my setup:
All my servers and my clients IP are in trusted_networks
First
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micah Anderson schrieb:
| [surprisingly low scores]
| The spams can be pulled from here: http://micah.riseup.net/spams
Most (all?) of the samples are forwarded through some debian.org
mechanism. In order for blacklists to take full effect, you sho
I feel like a lot of pretty obvious spams are getting through my system
with appallingly low scores. I'm starting to wonder if something may be
wrong with my setup. Looking at what spam tests did fire, I'm frequently
surprised that more rules didn't fire (obvious lotto scams and nigerian
inher
> On 22.02.08 14:04, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > I see a lot of messages hitting BAYES_00 and reducing enough to make it
> > a FN. After some learning, problem solved, but still an issue for new
> > message types. Is there a way to protect from this sort of thing? Like a
> > recipe not to add the
On 22.02.08 14:04, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I see a lot of messages hitting BAYES_00 and reducing enough to make it
> a FN. After some learning, problem solved, but still an issue for new
> message types. Is there a way to protect from this sort of thing? Like a
> recipe not to add the bayes sco
If you don't know what you are talking about, don't prove what an idiot you
are.
We have more than 100,000 users. We are a commercial service. They don't
post the prices. Read the post again.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 08:58 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html
> Maybe a link from pbl/zen pages to that would have helped.
There is. Right there in the PBL main text. There are only two links,
the second one reads 'Spamhaus DNSBL usage criter
> Can't find commercial pricing, but 'corporate' pricing is $168,000 per
> year
> for unlimited use. (100,000 per year is only $10,000 per year)
Michael
Corporate up to 100 users is $500 a year
http://www.spamhaus.org/datafeed/index.html
click on the service price check button
then select appr
Hi,
I have setup the mysql userprefs and it is working with one exception,
From: addresses listed as being whitelisted in mysql are not triggering
the SA whitelist scores. Other values like required_hits are being
properly returned, so SA is able to connect and query mysql. I do not
have the
> From: mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:48:04 +0100
> Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Pbl.spamhaus.org down?
>
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> From: Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Organization: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
>>> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -08
> From: mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:48:04 +0100
> Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Pbl.spamhaus.org down?
>
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> From: Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Organization: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
>>> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -08
Michael Scheidell wrote:
From: Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -0800
To: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Pbl.spamhaus.org down?
Quite possibly. I think they're getting stricter regarding their
fair use po
> From: Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -0800
> To: "users@spamassassin.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Pbl.spamhaus.org down?
>
> Quite possibly. I think they're getting stricter regarding their
> fair use policy. One of my ser
> From: SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:06:23 -0800
> To: Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: Pbl.spamhaus.org down?
>
> This is odd. A query to zen.spamhaus.org returned two answers.
You don't want to query .zen... Since it is a subzone. You want to query
Sambas folks: (sorry, if someone knows someone, please fwd this. I didn't
see any 'technical' contacts on their web site and I don't want to 'spam'
them. Technical contact via whois says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lets try
that.
Hey, google me. Go back to fdma.com days. I fought (hard) the usenet spam
Hello
I have spamassasin work under qmail (qmailrocks.org).
But there are lots of spams coming into the ezmlm mailing lists which are
not filtered by spamassasin as they are not user accounts.
Can someone please advice me on how to integrate Spamassasin to ezmlm lists
please.
Regards
Mohan
--
On 2/23/2008 4:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say, if we're all getting the same spam, isn't that what we're paying
sa-update to catch? :-)
paying? who's charging you?
what software/appliance/antispam device are you using?
20 matches
Mail list logo
