Thanks, that helped.
Any chance to make dcc plugin to work from local.cf or
user preference file? since as user, i can't change system installed
files.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, March 10, 2008 14:11, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
Hungry Snail wrote:
Site-wide is what i'm trying to setup, I guess i need to do some more
googling :)
assuming you're using db_file not SQL:
First create a path where you want your bayes DB to live, make that
directory world RWX. (ie: chmod 0777)
in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Hungry Snail wrote:
Site-wide is what i'm trying to setup, I guess i need to do some more
googling :)
Also, I've updated the wiki article on sitewide bayes. It is now at
least technically correct.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SiteWideBayesSetup
previously it
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
Forget it
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three)
Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with
the alternative
Hi!
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three)
Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with
the alternative server) I'd only recommend Razor2 and DCC.
Has anyone got experience with
OS: Debian Sarge
SpamAssassin: 3.0.3-2
Problem description:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a ham message to himself (i.e. From:==To:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
Autowhiltelisting mechanism adds [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the whiltelist.
A spammer sends spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from forged address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, romanovsky wrote:
The question is: how to disable autowhiltelisting in case of From:==To:?
Consider not calling SA at all if from == to. How is SA hooked in? If it's
via procmail, that's a fairly simple rule.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
romanovsky wrote:
OS: Debian Sarge
SpamAssassin: 3.0.3-2
Problem description:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a ham message to himself (i.e. From:==To:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
Autowhiltelisting mechanism adds [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the whiltelist.
A spammer sends spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from forged address
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
previously it had several bits of bad advice:
Don't /etc/mail/spamassassin to store your bayes DB
Don't specify -C on the sa-learn command-line. You REALLY don't want to
use that option on any SA tool unless you know exactly what you're
doing. (This option is
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, romanovsky wrote:
The question is: how to disable autowhiltelisting in case of From:==To:?
On 13.03.08 05:48, John Hardin wrote:
Consider not calling SA at all if from == to. How is SA hooked in? If it's
via procmail, that's a fairly simple rule.
what would not help
romanovsky wrote:
OS: Debian Sarge
SpamAssassin: 3.0.3-2
Problem description:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a ham message to himself (i.e. From:==To:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
Autowhiltelisting mechanism adds [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the whiltelist.
A spammer sends spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from forged
I have two mail servers running Spamassassin. One is running 3.1.9 and
the other 3.2.4, both with the same set of local rules, plus the
standard rules that come with each version.
The 'load' on the processors for 3.2.4 is about *4 times more *than the
'load' on 3.1.9.
Do others have the
made SA bugzilla ticket :
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5849
it explains why that don't work from local.cf file.
thanks for the help anyway!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, March 13, 2008 08:40, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
On Thu, March 13, 2008 13:16, romanovsky wrote:
SpamAssassin: 3.0.3-2
old
Problem description:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a ham message to himself (i.e. From:==To:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
Autowhiltelisting mechanism adds [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the whiltelist.
why is whitelistning of your own mail
On Thu, March 13, 2008 08:40, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
Thanks, that helped.
super
Any chance to make dcc plugin to work from local.cf or
user preference file?
explain problem more in detail, any plugins works from local.cf and user_prefs
only execption is it can not load from this *.cf
On Thu, March 13, 2008 14:18, Matt Kettler wrote:
USER_IN_WHITELIST means the message matched a whitelist_from,
whitelist_from_rcvd, or whitelist_from_spf statement in your configfiles.
spf no
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:19, R.Smits wrote:
Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
i am unsure if that is not just razor ?
Is anyone using pyzor ?
both server and client here yes
We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
(last
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:30, R.Smits wrote:
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
sure do, we are all here to help later even if it looks good later olso
Sorry i've asked.
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, March 12, 2008 16:19, R.Smits wrote:
Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
On 13.03.08 15:44, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i am unsure if that is not just razor ?
afaik it supports special features of commercial RAZOR version
Is anyone using pyzor ?
* Spam Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have two mail servers running Spamassassin. One is running 3.1.9 and
the other 3.2.4, both with the same set of local rules, plus the standard
rules that come with each version.
The 'load' on the processors for 3.2.4 is about *4 times more *than the
SA is called from amavisd-new.
I suppose that the problem should be solved on the level it was created,
i.e. on SA level.
I already have few patches of amavisd-new. Sure I can write another one.
Before do that dirty hack I'd like to search for a good solution.
Thanks for trying to help, John.
Matt,
You're absolutely right!
Thanks for you notice.
I found whitelist_from for some domains in the config.
Odds are, there's a well meaning, but woefully mistaken whitelist_from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the config somewhere..
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, romanovsky wrote:
The question is: how to disable autowhiltelisting in case of From:==To:?
On 13.03.08 05:48, John Hardin wrote:
Consider not calling SA at all if from == to. How is SA hooked in? If it's
via procmail,
Hi,
I really have my HTML rules cranked up and it's killing my PayPal payment
notifications. I can't whitelist by From because PayPal sends the
notifications from the person sending the money and not an address in the
paypal.com domain.
How can I whitelist these messages? Is there some way to
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080313 07:59]:
Is anyone using pyzor ?
both server and client here yes
looking at it now, I got no PYZOR catches last day :(
FWIW, at our site PYZOR_CHECK fires on about 65% of all of our spam. We
had a total of 7523 hits for PYZOR_CHECK
Michael B Allen wrote:
I really have my HTML rules cranked up and it's killing my PayPal payment
notifications. I can't whitelist by From because PayPal sends the
notifications from the person sending the money and not an address in the
paypal.com domain.
How can I whitelist these messages? Is
Savoy, Jim wrote:
I think you need to change:
body NICE_GIRL_01 /Hello! I am (?:bored|tired)
(?:today|this(?:afternoon|evening)|tonight)\./
to:
body NICE_GIRL_01 /Hello! I am (?:bored|tired) (?:today|this
(?:afternoon|evening)|tonight)\./
(ie add a space after the word this).
It probably
-Original Message-
From: Rob McEwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:40 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelisting PayPal Notification of payment Messages
Michael B Allen wrote:
I really have my HTML rules cranked up and it's
Spam Admin wrote:
I have two mail servers running Spamassassin. One is running 3.1.9 and
the other 3.2.4, both with the same set of local rules, plus the
standard rules that come with each version.
The 'load' on the processors for 3.2.4 is about *4 times more *than the
'load' on 3.1.9.
James E. Pratt wrote:
Well, if they truly aren't coming from paypal servers at all, the above
is really of no use... Can you find a static text string in them that is
unique to the emails for which you could write a body rule for?
Regards,
jamie
James,
That would be too easy to forge,
-Original Message-
From: Rob McEwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:27 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelisting PayPal Notification of payment Messages
James E. Pratt wrote:
Well, if they truly aren't coming from paypal servers at
Rob, the OP stated the emails were *not* coming from any paypal servers.
Am I missing something here?
I believe he said the Fron address didn't show paypal, NOT that it wasn't
coming from a paypal/ebay server.
I believe the way these work, is they come from any one of a number of
internal
On 13/03/2008 12:18 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi,
I really have my HTML rules cranked up and it's killing my PayPal payment
notifications. I can't whitelist by From because PayPal sends the
notifications from the person sending the money and not an address in the
paypal.com domain.
The
Yes, the hardware is identical. The MX records are both '10', and the
volume of mail is slightly LESS on the 3.2.4 machine over the 3.1.9 it's
taking more time to process less mail on the newer machine.
We have 2.5 Gig memory on each machine. Our graphs show that we are
using about 1.5 Gig of
OK, I didn't get any responses to the question I posted late yesterday
(hint, hint), but I'll give it a try with another question. I've just
gotten sa-update running. I'm grabbing the base set, sare, and sought.
My mail log is showing the following:
Mar 13 15:46:11 eclogite
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:19:55PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
OK, I didn't get any responses to the question I posted late yesterday
(hint, hint), but I'll give it a try with another question.
[snip]
(Oh, and [yeah, I know, I said it already] it would be really cool if
someone could
On 13/03/2008 5:15 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:19:55PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
OK, I didn't get any responses to the question I posted late yesterday
(hint, hint), but I'll give it a try with another question.
[snip]
(Oh, and [yeah, I know, I said it already] it
Hi all,
I upgraded to sa 3.2.4
And I've been restarting spamd every 15 minutes just to keep mail coming in,
This is what is constantly coming up in the maillog
plugin: eval failed: child processing timeout at /usr/local/bin/spamd line
1259.
Any help would be appreciated
Running
Freebsd
On 13/03/2008 7:08 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded to sa 3.2.4
And I've been restarting spamd every 15 minutes just to keep mail coming in,
This is what is constantly coming up in the maillog
plugin: eval failed: child processing timeout at /usr/local/bin/spamd line
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:19:55PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Mar 13 15:46:11 eclogite mimedefang-multiplexor[7518]: [ID 980602
mail.info] Slave 3 stderr: config: path
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/languages is inaccessible: Permission
denied
What is that file, and what is using it?
What other info should I post?
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:16 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Plugin eval failed
On 13/03/2008 7:08 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded to sa
On 13/03/2008 8:02 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
What other info should I post?
The output of vmstat while this is happening.
A definition of constantly. Every message, some % of messages? For
some common size of messages? Whether it happens when scanning mail for
a subset of users or for all
1.We have a sitewide config
2.Startup parameters are
command_args=-d --min-children=2 --max-children=10 --min-spare=2
--max-spare=3 --max-conn-per-child=100 -r ${pidfile}
3.I do not scan messages over 250 k
4.We process roughly 5k messages daily
5. the hardware is ehh kinda crappy, but we
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:19:55PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Mar 13 15:46:11 eclogite mimedefang-multiplexor[7518]: [ID 980602
mail.info] Slave 3 stderr: config: path
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/languages is inaccessible: Permission
denied
What is
I've got a boat load of these in my maillog:
Mar 9 04:39:12 database spamd[3881]: prefork: server reached --max-children
setting, consider raising it
It occurs whenever we get a burst of spam and all the child threads are
busy. I'm using a sendmail, spamass-milter, SpamAssassin configuration.
45 matches
Mail list logo
