http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PluginWritingTips
Gives plugin writing tips. But is there a beginners
plugin-writing-howto.
What are requisites. I am fairly comfortable writing in perl, will that
be enough. I want to call a web api for a third party scanner within SA
Thanks
Ram
Christoph Petersen wrote:
Hey guys,
got some strange problem during my vacation the last week. For once
it seems
that the network stack of SA crashed so no new processes could be
spawned or
that the spamd crashed and blocked the port. The second problem looks
very
cryptic to me
Hi,
over the last couple of days I seem to get more and more spam wich looks
like a bounced email with subjects like MAILER DAEMON ... and other
variations, where the emails are bounced from mostly russian servers and
where my email address has been spoofed so that I recieve the bounced mail
Fine - thanks for the quick reply. I assume there's no need for a bug
report regarding this issue, correct?
So I'll do nothing more but waiting for the fix via sa-update :-)
Robert
Justin Mason schrieb:
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_M=FCller?= writes:
Hi all,
as I'm facing raising amount of
actually, if you could open a bug that'd be great -- I wasn't
planning on backporting the fix to 3.2.x updates.
--j.
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_M=FCller?= writes:
Fine - thanks for the quick reply. I assume there's no need for a bug
report regarding this issue, correct?
So I'll do nothing more
actually, if you could open a bug that'd be great -- I wasn't
planning on backporting the fix to 3.2.x updates.
--j.
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_M=FCller?= writes:
Fine - thanks for the quick reply. I assume there's no need for a bug
report regarding this issue, correct?
So I'll do nothing more
actually, if you could open a bug that'd be great -- I wasn't
planning on backporting the fix to 3.2.x updates.
--j.
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_M=FCller?= writes:
Fine - thanks for the quick reply. I assume there's no need for a bug
report regarding this issue, correct?
So I'll do nothing more
use the VBounce plugin. see faq
Geert Batsleer writes:
Hi,
over the last couple of days I seem to get more and more spam wich looks
like a bounced email with subjects like MAILER DAEMON ... and other
variations, where the emails are bounced from mostly russian servers and
Jason Esman wrote:
What are people doing about joe jobs at this point? What custom rules, and or
pluggins?
We
1) Use VBounce
2) For any message hitting ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE our MD filter tries
to extract the original message from the bounce and run that
through SpamAssassin and then use the
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:13:19PM +0530, ram wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/PluginWritingTips
Gives plugin writing tips. But is there a beginners
plugin-writing-howto.
I took perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin
--
Christian Recktenwald : voice +49 711 601 2091 :
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 23:02, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Yes, that's a possibility, but I can not do that. At least not in the near
future. Any other ideas?
depends, but i like to know why spf can't work for you ?
I don't speak for OP, but here is an example:
I
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 23:06, mouss wrote:
you rely on the sender address, make sure to reject it in your smtpd
(you don't want to give spammers an open road).
that was why i sugested spf
blocking a sender in postfix is trivial. adding SPF support requires
mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results from that. Thanks
On Tue, 6 May 2008, mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results
Chris St. Pierre wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008, mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses
being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be
simple to
check the
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is
free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record. Here's how you would configure your
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your highest
numbered fake MX record. Here's how you would configure your
Hi,
what I want to do is:
If score = 5 = 15 change subject to ***SPAM***
If score = 15 change subject to HIGH_SPAM***
with procmail I can control the score level and p.e. put the mail in a
different folder.
But I'm using a database and I just want to change the subject and depending
on
Hi
2008/5/7 pingu22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
what I want to do is:
If score = 5 = 15 change subject to ***SPAM***
If score = 15 change subject to HIGH_SPAM***
with procmail I can control the score level and p.e. put the mail in a
different folder.
The question here is how do
Hi,
I'm using Postfix and I call SA from procmail.
I'm changing the subject already in local.cf with rewrite_header subject ,
but I want to change depending on score.
in procmail where I have
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
I'd like to change subject here for example
I did it already...
With procmail...
It's working now.
thanks anyway Luis.
pingu22 wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Postfix and I call SA from procmail.
I'm changing the subject already in local.cf with rewrite_header subject ,
but I want to change depending on score.
in procmail where I have
- Original Message -
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam and
at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is free
and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your highest
numbered fake MX record. Here's
where is this line found?
On May 6, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Robert Müller wrote:
So for testing purposes I modified the line
old:
header __BOUNCE_FROM_DAEMON From =~ /(?:(?:daemon|deamon|majordomo|
postmaster|virus|scanner|devnull|automated-response|SMTP.gateway|
doh!
I guess if I read the subject line that would have helped.
On May 7, 2008, at 11:15 AM, JP Kelly wrote:
where is this line found?
On May 6, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Robert Müller wrote:
So for testing purposes I modified the line
old:
header __BOUNCE_FROM_DAEMON From =~
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record. Here's how you would
doh!
I guess if I read the subject line that would have helped.
You are not alone with this ;D It's a good practise to include all data in the
body of the message, and not to refer to the subject. I once learned that in
school and it seems to be true..
jarif
On May 7, 2008, at 11:15
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record.
I've opened bug 5901.
Thanks,
Robert
Justin Mason schrieb:
actually, if you could open a bug that'd be great -- I wasn't
planning on backporting the fix to 3.2.x updates.
--j.
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Robert_M=FCller?= writes:
Fine - thanks for the quick reply. I assume there's no need for a bug
Sorry for missing the most important part of the information in the body
- I fully agree with you.
On the other side, I learned at school to carefully read all parts of
the document - seems also to be true :-)
Robert
Jari Fredriksson schrieb:
doh!
I guess if I read the subject line that
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest numbered fake MX record.
Marc Perkel wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This
is free and mutual benefit. I (junkemailfilter.com) want to be your
highest
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
DAve wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking for a few volunteers who want to reduce their spambot spam
and at the same time help me track spambots for my black list. This is
free
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 23:06, mouss wrote:
snip
I see from your headers that you use postfix and amavdis-new, and that
such messages are submitted with the sendmail command. if you trust the
machine (no php mail to outside), then you can skip filtering for mail
submitted via sendmail. to do
One of the users (actually the boss) had the email address harvested and we got
clobbered
by backscatter. Looking at the emails of the various 'unable to deliver' type
messages, I saw
what these could be filtered on, but don't know how to write up and implement
the rule
outside of procmail.
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
If you just want IPs, maybe instead of running an SMTP service that
450s, you would want to use a packet filter like iptables instead. You
could get the IPs simply by what packets you saw come in to port 25 and
noone would have to worry you were
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
If you just want IPs, maybe instead of running an SMTP service that 450s,
you would want to use a packet filter like iptables instead. You could get
the IPs simply by what packets
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) Mark is trying to collect data on how the remote MTA behaves when
presented with a 451 tmpfail result. A firewall rule can't do that.
From his message: I'm not interested in the
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:44 PM, John Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) Mark is trying to collect data on how the remote MTA behaves when
presented with a 451 tmpfail result. A firewall rule can't do that.
From his message: I'm not
p class=3DMsoNormala href=3Dhttp://{MACCCLINK=3Dtestmaclink,3,http://=
67.228.184.50/links1.txt,www.easyaddedvivacecreation.com}/?asdfdwrt2qxfpm=
7DuzjjB82iEozsAEajsqbEHave a look at our site/a/p
Do you have a reference for more on this? Is this just obfuscation or
does it do something bad
I'm new to SA so bear with me. I've got a Debian server as a gateway
server that has SA installed. I tried to release some mail that was
marked as spam. When the user got the mail it was a merged email with the
attachment and the original email. How do I instruct SA not to merge
attachments
Jon L. Miller wrote:
I'm new to SA so bear with me.
You have posted to the right place for SA questions. Welcome!
I've got a Debian server as a gateway server that has SA installed.
I tried to release some mail that was marked as spam.
If it was marked as spam it would have had the report
I have been reading throught the Shortcircuit manpage as well as some
articles within the Wiki, and the manner in which I see it performing
within our install does not seem to coincide with how I am reading and
presumably understanding it to work.
First off, we are using SpamAssassin 3.2.4
On Thu, May 8, 2008 05:00, Joseph Brennan wrote:
p class=3DMsoNormala href=3Dhttp://{MACCCLINK=3Dtestmaclink,3,http://=
67.228.184.50/links1.txt,www.easyaddedvivacecreation.com}/?asdfdwrt2qxfpm=
7DuzjjB82iEozsAEajsqbEHave a look at our site/a/p
Do you have a reference for more on this? Is
43 matches
Mail list logo
