On Sun, May 11, 2008 03:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All I know is that I don't use SPF anymore for my domain as there are
> just too many problems... e.g., forwarded messages.
and you usely dont know where you forwards going from, :/(
come on, please :-)
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ?
>> All a spam program would have to do is say "[EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
>> to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
>> one more post from him, muhahaha."
SB> If "Bob" posts a lot to a list(s) and is respected within said
SB> list(s), then the other subs of that list
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 19:48, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> > --On Saturday, May 10, 2008 9:57 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> fyi: post in bugtraq. You may wish to look for and remove any whitelists
> >> based on google, googlegroups, or gmail accounts until google fixes
On Sat, May 10, 2008 19:48, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> --On Saturday, May 10, 2008 9:57 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> fyi: post in bugtraq. You may wish to look for and remove any whitelists
>> based on google, googlegroups, or gmail accounts until google fixes this.
> I
On 10/05/2008 18:40, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 18:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[21292] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.01
find where this is installed:
rpm -qa | grep IO-Zlib
rpm -e IO-Zlib-1.01 (only if its there)
i do not know if its really called
--On Saturday, May 10, 2008 9:57 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fyi: post in bugtraq. You may wish to look for and remove any whitelists
based on google, googlegroups, or gmail accounts until google fixes this.
I was surprised to hear that anyone gave whitelist sta
On Sat, May 10, 2008 18:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [21292] dbg: diag: module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.01
find where this is installed:
rpm -qa | grep IO-Zlib
rpm -e IO-Zlib-1.01 (only if its there)
i do not know if its really called that as rpm
if its there upgrade it in rpm, if you
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 08:55, ram wrote:
>
> > Precisely what I am afraid of. But the issue is whatever header I use
> > for envelope-from all of them can be trivially forged
> > I am trying replacing all the X-Envelope headers before sending them to
> > scan servers
On 09.05.08 23:39, Benny Pede
On Sat, May 10, 2008 16:42, Geoff Soper wrote:
> Can anyone suggest what I should do next?
post output of
spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint
i belive you have older versions from rpm installed, dont use rpm and cpan at
the same time !
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?cou
I've previously used RDJ to keep my SA rules up-to-date but have got the
impression I should be using sa-update instead.
My first step was to run "sa-update && service spamassassin restart" but
this gave the following error:
IO::Zlib version 1.04 required--this is only version 1.01 at
/
Jeff Koch wrote:
If you guys are going to keep looking at the wrong part of the header
information that I sent in nothing will get done.
What makes you believe we are looking at the wrong part? see below.
Please look at the section below the spam scoring. Here's the header
from the user's
Jeff Koch wrote:
That part (i.e. the top part of the header) was generated by qmail.
Please look at the bottom part of the header after the spam scoring
which shows the header from the user's email which was mistakenly
scored as a forged_mua_outlook.
The message-id is the same, but anyway,
If you guys are going to keep looking at the wrong part of the header
information that I sent in nothing will get done. Please look at the
section below the spam scoring. Here's the header from the user's email and
it was sent from Outlook Express:
Received: from unknown (HELO jade.xx.co
That part (i.e. the top part of the header) was generated by qmail. Please
look at the bottom part of the header after the spam scoring which shows
the header from the user's email which was mistakenly scored as a
forged_mua_outlook.
At 04:13 AM 5/10/2008, mouss wrote:
Randy Ramsdell wrote
fyi: post in bugtraq. You may wish to look for and remove any whitelists
based on google, googlegroups, or gmail accounts until google fixes this.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer
-- Fo
On Sat, May 10, 2008 15:09, D Hill wrote:
> On a side note, Outlook and Outlook Express also HELO with the computer's
> name when sending a message through an email server.
yes windows mailclients can say helo with a dot in the helo either, so thay
cant do a fqdn in the helo unless its a spambot
On Sat, 10 May 2008 at 10:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[snip]
Scratch that and reverse it. If it does match, then it will score the
message header as fake. oops :) sorry. Let me check some more things.
Did outlook really generate this message-id:
Message
On Sat, May 10, 2008 08:52, Obantec Support wrote:
> looks like a lot of warnings, any advise welcomed.
and you only have 3.2.4 installed now ?
is all perl modules up2date ?
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[snip]
Scratch that and reverse it. If it does match, then it will score the
message header as fake. oops :) sorry. Let me check some more things.
Did outlook really generate this message-id:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
?
19 matches
Mail list logo
