At 17:34 16-07-2008, Ron Smith wrote:
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission folder it USUALLY gets a .sub extension applied
within a minute or two. However I am seeing orphaned files that are
both non-spam and spam that just get left as .tmp files.
On 17.07.08 01:51, Linspeed wrote:
> Is it OK to run sa-learn with the --spam option on messages that have
> already had the SpamAssassin message placed at the top?
yes, SA removes those headers. If there are some extra headers you want to
use, you can still use bayes_ignore_header
--
Matus UHLA
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:33:31PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> The message to this list earlier today from Ron Smith ("orphaned .tmp
> files in the submission folder") hit my ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE,BAYES_00,
> BOUNCE_MESSAGE rules and I can't for the life of me see why.
>
> I have procmail set up to f
Hi,
for a mail server running email for multiple domains what is the
typical/recommended way to collect emails which arent detected as spam to be
processed by sa-learn? Users are downloading mail via POP3, so once a users
sees a mail and decides that it is in fact spam its already been removed
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:33:31PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > The message to this list earlier today from Ron Smith ("orphaned .tmp
> > files in the submission folder") hit my ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE,BAYES_00,
> > BOUNCE_MESSAGE rules and I can't for the life of me see why.
> >
> > I have procmail
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 12:43 +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:33:31PM +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > The message to this list earlier today from Ron Smith ("orphaned .tmp
> > files in the submission folder") hit my ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE,BAYES_00,
> > BOUNCE_MESSAGE rules and I can'
On Monday, July 14, 2008, 10:01:34 AM, Skip Brott wrote:
> I am seeing an
> increase in spam reaching my end users.
>
> Is there something more that I can be doing? Maybe I need to start updating
> from some additional rule sets?
Do you have network tests enabled?
What kinds of spams are getti
Are you actually READING this list?
Sent Jul 11, Jul 14, and now again Jul 17. Identical text, including
typos. Got quite a few replies and discussion. No follow up by you,
though.
Please stop sending the same question over and over again, if you are
not reading the replies.
guenther
--
cha
Thanks, SM.
spamassassin --lint has always returned no issues with the rules.
spamassassin -D --lint returns a 304 line log file which I can provide
if requested. Other than the failure with Net::Ident (which refuses to
install under CPAN because it fails the make test), there is nothing
Soz, I just saw that. Until today my attempts to mail the subscibe address
on this list were'nt resulting in an autoreply etc.
I only recieved confirmation I was subscribed to this list some 20 mins ago,
im taking a look now at the replys
thanks Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Kars
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:39 +0200, Andy Smith wrote:
> Soz, I just saw that. Until today my attempts to mail the subscibe address
> on this list were'nt resulting in an autoreply etc.
> I only recieved confirmation I was subscribed to this list some 20 mins ago,
> im taking a look now at the repl
Ron Smith schrieb am 17.07.2008 14:28:
I'm assuming that the spamc is probably failing, sending the .tmp file
back to the Submitted folder and CommuniGate is then reprocessing the
message and sending it back to scanspam.sh and so again to spamc.
Now to figure out why spamc is failing on these
Hi All,
thanks very much for all the replies and discussion around my original
post, and appologies for not replying
more promptly, Ive only just managed to successfully subscribe to the list
and managed to confuse myself looking
at the forum archives (I think there had been some delays to whe
Hi Ron,
At 05:28 17-07-2008, Ron Smith wrote:
spamassassin --lint has always returned no issues with the rules.
spamassassin -D --lint returns a 304 line log file which I can provide
if requested. Other than the failure with Net::Ident (which refuses to
install under CPAN because it fails the mak
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing the
headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL checks. So I
left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some strange entries
(sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these don't happen too
often, but I
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing the
headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL checks. So I
left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some strange entries
(sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these don't happen too
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing
the headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL
checks. So I left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some
strange entries (sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these
do
Richard Frovarp wrote:
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing
the headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL
checks. So I left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some
strange entries (sorry for the long post here
Hi Tica,
Tica wrote:
After a few tries (it was my mistake about the the patch error) I was able
to patch spamd, but after a few testing, I needed to fall back to unpatched
3.2.5
The patched version was with two problems:
1. Spam scanning was not working... I got the same error to a lot of
in
19 matches
Mail list logo
