not007 wrote:
I am using cpanel 11 and being told that I can't get spamassassin to rewrite
the subject of emails that are spam. Spam assassin IS adding info in the
header like:
X-Spam-Subject: [SPAM] test message
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1002.4
X-Spam-Score: 10024
X-Spam-Bar: ++
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 20:27 -0700, not007 wrote:
> I am using cpanel 11 and being told that I can't get spamassassin to rewrite
> the subject of emails that are spam. Spam assassin IS adding info in the
> header like:
>
> X-Spam-Subject: [SPAM] test message
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1002.4
> X-
not007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using cpanel 11 and being told that I can't get spamassassin to rewrite
> the subject of emails that are spam. Spam assassin IS adding info in the
> header like:
You *can* get SA to rewrite the subject, but what cpanel 11
does in conjunction with SA is bey
What about the ShortCircuiting Ruleset? Not sure if it would completely
stop emails from getting chewed on.
The other option would be not sending them to SA. I don't know what MTA
your using, but I know you can setup another postfix instance on the same
server and by configuration you could have
Evan Platt wrote:
> First off, please don't post your question 3 times. This isn't a chat room.
The reason is this:
> > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/How-to-integrate-spamassassin-in-a-web-app--tp19542141p19542141.html
> > Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list
saleen34 wrote:
Here is my problem, i have been trying for a few months now and can't get it
to work.
Some emails sent from a certain host that I trust are huge with lots of
url's, etc. They are for debugging purposes. When they come in it seems to
hang spamd. We get a lot of these btw. This is a
xdmx wrote:
Hi, i'm developing a simple web application, which has a newsletter. I'd like
to integrate the possibility to do an automatically check of the mail that
will be sent, which can be showed to the user before he send it. I know that
there are sites which do this. So i'd like to know how
I may have found my solution:
acl_check_data:
accept
hosts = : +relay_from_hosts
If I put that accept clause hopefully it will just accept the mail, without
continuing down to the spam checking. I'll let you know and thanks for the
response!
saleen34 wrote:
>
> Here is my problem,
Hi, i'm developing a simple web application, which has a newsletter. I'd like
to integrate the possibility to do an automatically check of the mail that
will be sent, which can be showed to the user before he send it. I know that
there are sites which do this. So i'd like to know how can this can
Hi, i'm developing a simple web application, which has a newsletter. I'd like
to integrate the possibility to do an automatically check of the mail that
will be sent, which can be showed to the user before he send it. I know that
there are sites which do this. So i'd like to know how can this can
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, saleen34 wrote:
Some emails sent from a certain host that I trust are huge with lots of
url's, etc. They are for debugging purposes. When they come in it seems
to hang spamd. We get a lot of these btw. This is a dual core 3 ghz, 2
gigs ram so I don't think power is the pro
Hi, i'm developing a simple web application, which has a newsletter. I'd like
to integrate the possibility to do an automatically check of the mail that
will be sent, which can be showed to the user before he send it. I know that
there are sites which do this. So i'd like to know how can this can
Here is my problem, i have been trying for a few months now and can't get it
to work.
Some emails sent from a certain host that I trust are huge with lots of
url's, etc. They are for debugging purposes. When they come in it seems to
hang spamd. We get a lot of these btw. This is a dual core 3 ghz,
> Hi all,
>
> What would the reccomended procedure be for upgrading SA from 3.001008 to
> 3.002003 and then staying up to date.
>
> This would be on FreeBSD 6.n, with the original SA installed from ports.
>
> TIA,
>
> -Grant
>
Sorry, just saw this.
Should be easy, a portupgrade -R p5-Mail-Sp
Jack Raats пишет:
Hi Grant,
First update the ports (see the handbook how (cvsup-without-gui and
portupgrade))
After this you'll run portupgrade -a
It seems to me that using `portupgrade -a` is not very good.
You should consult /usr/ports/UPDATING and look if there are special
instructions f
RobertH writes:
> > ok, the rule-QA results are in:
> >
> > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20080916-r695772-
> > n&rule=%2FTD_NOWRAP&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic&g=Change
> >
> > MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
> > 0.0 0.1669 0.
>
>
> ok, the rule-QA results are in:
>
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20080916-r695772-
> n&rule=%2FTD_NOWRAP&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic&g=Change
>
> MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
> 0.0 0.1669 0. 1.0000.770.01
I've been working with Blaine Flemming and he's compiling his own DOB
data and I'm publishing it for him. I'm throwing it out there to see if
any of you find it as useful as I am finding it. The list can be
accessed as follows:
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com = 127.0.0.6
What I'm catching is UR
> Len Conrad wrote:
> > example:
> >
> > Sep 16 01:18:22 mx1 amavis[11483]: (11483-01-31) Passed CLEAN,
> > [12.xx.40.141] [12.xx.40.141] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail_id: 2M64mzvIA3wf, Hits: -,
> > queued_as: 2CC9D1AF49B, 407 ms
> >
> > is "-
ok, the rule-QA results are in:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20080916-r695772-n&rule=%2FTD_NOWRAP&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic&g=Change
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
0.0 0.1669 0. 1.0000.770.01 T_PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 07:11 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> I just discovered the "Day old Bread" list of host names under 5 days
> old. I don't know where they get it but the list is very useful.
>
> As many of you know I also track hosts that don't use the QUIT command
> to close connections. So
It's ugly, but it actually seems to work:
rawbody PBA_TEST /Content.*\n\n.*\n.*http.*\n\n-/
Any comments before I activate it?
patrickbaer wrote:
>
> Sorry for not posting a whole email, I tried but the message got blocked
> :)
>
> My problem are those two-liners: One line of text, seco
22 matches
Mail list logo
