Hi!
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
So you have bigger message volume, this applies to many lists. S
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 07:43 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
> > I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
> > are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
>
> show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
>
On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
> I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
> are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
else:
score *_SURBL 0
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? htt
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they are
no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
I would just put a 0.0 score in local.cf for all their rules , but I
guess when the rules are removed from the actual cf files by sa-update
then at that time I will have
>
> Is there any direct way to make SA and clamav talk thour it
> clam.socke file?
>
> I want to avoid amavis or mailscanner
>
> :)
>
luis
and also, dont forget to program to use the other clamav signatures that are
out there.
dont forget to score the clamav plugin rule high and "smtp re
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz schrieb:
> Is there any direct way to make SA and clamav talk thour it clam.socke file?
>
> I want to avoid amavis or mailscanner
>
> :)
Hi,
i use clamav-milter and spamass-milter with postfix
2.5.5 without any Problems
this does the urgent jobs af spam and virus filterin
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 15:06 +, Justin Mason wrote:
> actually, Bayes would be a good one to drop. If you also remove AWL,
> and comment out both "loadplugin" lines, you will remove the need to
> load the DB_File database module too.
>
> commenting plugins and removing rulesets is definitely
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:33:20 -0600:
> I have now 39mb of free ram, enogut to work
You have more, use free.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Ned Slider wrote:
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
For those using RHEL5/CentOS5 and wanting to update,
We use Scientific Linux 5 which is a re-compiled RHEL 5
*erm*, actually it's Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL 4), the rest is true tho ;)
- with Dag's
3.56 rpm installed. I installed
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
I got it, thanks any way.
:D
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 14:38:52 mouss wrote:
> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> > Is there any direct way to make SA and clamav talk thour it clam.socke
> > file?
>
> there's a clamav plugin for SA.
>
> > I wan
Anton Herber schrieb:
Is there a way to ignore allready scanned mails or mails coming from
mailman, so they don't get scored again while being delivered to the
enduser?
You can use a separate smtpd for Mailman. A master.cf entry like this
will open port 20025, accept only from the local IP, a
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> Is there any direct way to make SA and clamav talk thour it clam.socke file?
>
there's a clamav plugin for SA.
> I want to avoid amavis or mailscanner
why not use clamsmtpd?
you could also use a milter.
Is there any direct way to make SA and clamav talk thour it clam.socke file?
I want to avoid amavis or mailscanner
:)
OK,
thanks alot to all,
:)
top - 14:33:38 up 1 day, 23:28, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.05
Tasks: 53 total, 1 running, 52 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.7%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem:255692k total, 216484k used,39208k
Henrik K a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:35:49PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
>>> No of courseno
>>>
>>> -> soekris -> final mail server
>>>
>> so you will store mail on it? Then you definitely should consider adding
>> a HD. I think it's worth the price...
>
>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:35:49PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> > No of courseno
> >
> > -> soekris -> final mail server
> >
>
> so you will store mail on it? Then you definitely should consider adding
> a HD. I think it's worth the price...
And why not only use th
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
> No of courseno
>
> -> soekris -> final mail server
>
so you will store mail on it? Then you definitely should consider adding
a HD. I think it's worth the price...
>
> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 13:24:32 Henrik K wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:09:06P
No of courseno
-> soekris -> final mail server
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 13:24:32 Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> > 256 MB RAM
> > 2GB Flash
> >
> > I cant and I wond to swapmemory because intensive IO can burn flashcard.
> > I'm us
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:09:06PM -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> 256 MB RAM
> 2GB Flash
>
> I cant and I wond to swapmemory because intensive IO can burn flashcard.
> I'm using tmpfs for those IO that I cant avoid.
Having swap doesn't mean that it's "intensively" used. If you keep som
256 MB RAM
2GB Flash
I cant and I wond to swapmemory because intensive IO can burn flashcard.
I'm using tmpfs for those IO that I cant avoid.
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 12:36:39 John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 December 2008 08:18:50 Joh
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:27:03PM -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> Yes, no swap because it runs under a flash card.
No,
If it can be partitioned, swap can be made.
If it has a filesystem, swap can be made.
But that's a bit off topic for this list.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 08:18:50 John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 10:21 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
I've run full SA, ClamAV, MySQL, named, websites etc on 256MB. You do
need swap for it. If you have a filesystem, then you can create
Yes, no swap because it runs under a flash card.
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 08:18:50 John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 10:21 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:58:40PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> > > You should be able to run base SA, a bayes database (you'll probably
Yes, no swap because it runs under a flash card.
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 08:18:50 John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 10:21 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:58:40PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> > > You should be able to run base SA, a bayes database (you'll probably
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
John Hardin wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:18:50 -0800:
I am running both Sought rulesets myself
both?
The original fully-automated sought that's fed from spamtraps and the
sought_fraud set that's fed from hand-picked fraud spams.
--
John Hardin K
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Henrik K wrote:
If you really need massive throughput, the sane way is to use only
optimized MTA and milter rules.
If you really need massive throughput you won't be using the platform in
question...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhard
John Hardin wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:18:50 -0800:
> I am running both Sought rulesets myself
both?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:06:38PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 14:39, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:18:50AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> >>
> >> We don't have any information on available disk, so I was assuming it
> >> was limited.
> >> ...
> >> "no swap"
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 14:39, Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:18:50AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>> We don't have any information on available disk, so I was assuming it
>> was limited.
>> ...
>> "no swap" was specified, which also suggests limited disk.
>
> Flash is cheap, I would
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:18:50AM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>
> We don't have any information on available disk, so I was assuming it
> was limited.
> ...
> "no swap" was specified, which also suggests limited disk.
Flash is cheap, I would expect it to be in the GB range. :)
Given that even per
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 10:21 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:58:40PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> >
> > You should be able to run base SA, a bayes database (you'll probably want
> > to avoid autolearning) and *some* custom rules. You might not be able to
> > use the larger cust
Hi Mark, Hi Mouss.
Thanks, it's working like a charm now! While thinking about how to
implement mouss' suggestion your mail arrived and saved much time
searching the web again, Mark. Thank you again.
Mark Martinec schrieb:
Anton,
I'm currently having a problem with spamassassin (SpamAss
Anton Herber schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently having a problem with spamassassin (SpamAssassin version
> 3.2.5, running on Perl version 5.10.0). I'm using Spamassassin within
> postfix/spamd/spamc in /etc/postfix/master.cf:
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>
Anton,
> I'm currently having a problem with spamassassin (SpamAssassin version
> 3.2.5, running on Perl version 5.10.0). I'm using Spamassassin within
> postfix/spamd/spamc in /etc/postfix/master.cf:
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=sp
Anton Herber a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently having a problem with spamassassin (SpamAssassin version
> 3.2.5, running on Perl version 5.10.0). I'm using Spamassassin within
> postfix/spamd/spamc in /etc/postfix/master.cf:
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>
Hi,
I'm currently having a problem with spamassassin (SpamAssassin version
3.2.5, running on Perl version 5.10.0). I'm using Spamassassin within
postfix/spamd/spamc in /etc/postfix/master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:21:44AM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:58:40PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> >
> > You should be able to run base SA, a bayes database (you'll probably want
> > to avoid autolearning) and *some* custom rules. You might not be able to
> > use the larg
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:58:40PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>
> You should be able to run base SA, a bayes database (you'll probably want
> to avoid autolearning) and *some* custom rules. You might not be able to
> use the larger custom rules like the Sought sets - try them and see.
Having som
38 matches
Mail list logo
