Hi,
I'm using SA 3.2.5 with Horde/IMP ans Postfix 2.5.5 with virtual users. My
config is similar like this:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
I want to use bayes (SQL) auto learn with virtual users and this works as long
as clients send through SMTP and an real
all,
I'm trying to blacklist email frcm '*Vegas Club Casino' *Hi wich is being
sent from different email adressess but always with the same 'From' in the
header.
Tried putting it in local.cf as blacklist_from Vegas Club Casino
but those mails keep coming.
How can I filter just on the from
On 04.03.09 10:10, Geert Batsleer wrote:
I'm trying to blacklist email frcm '*Vegas Club Casino' *Hi wich is being
sent from different email adressess but always with the same 'From' in the
header.
Tried putting it in local.cf as blacklist_from Vegas Club Casino
but those mails keep
On 3/4/2009 10:18 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 04.03.09 10:10, Geert Batsleer wrote:
I'm trying to blacklist email frcm '*Vegas Club Casino' *Hi wich is being
sent from different email adressess but always with the same 'From' in the
header.
Tried putting it in local.cf as
Le 03/03/2009 17:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
I have been already thinking about possibility to combine every two
rules and do a masscheck over them. Then, optionally repeating that
again, skipping duplicates. Finally gather all rules that scored=0.5
||=-0.5 - we could have
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 00:43, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:06, John Wilcock j...@tradoc.fr wrote:
Le 03/03/2009 17:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
I have been already thinking about possibility to combine every two
rules
and do a masscheck
Le 04/03/2009 10:38, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
I should note that some policy rules and rules with manually updated scores
(SPF_PASS, BAYES_*) may need to be exempted from this.
We don't want SPF_PASS to generate high positive score, do we?
It could probably be argued both ways. There
Justin Mason wrote:
So you're volunteering to code it up, then? ;)
I was planning to do at least some brainstorming+experiements as to what
learning methods would seem suitable and how well the method performs,
whenever I have time again. Unless someone else did that already?
smime.p7s
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:02:06 -0700:
How is it the same? Already read messages in inbox means the user has
accepted those messages without trashing them or junking them.
and the message may not have been learned by score.
If you can make sure that your users *really* delete or
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 17:07, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I am considering the following:
Autolearn read mail in the inbox as ham
Autolearn mail in .Junk and .SPAM as spam
This is pretty east with maildir.
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
LuKreme wrote on Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:02:06 -0700:
How is it the same? Already read messages in inbox means the user has
accepted those messages without trashing them or junking them.
If you can make sure that your users *really* delete or move spam to
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I should note that some policy rules and rules with manually updated scores
(SPF_PASS, BAYES_*) may need to be exempted from this.
We don't want SPF_PASS to generate high positive score, do we?
The idea of all this is that we might discover things like
Justin Mason wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 00:43, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:06, John Wilcock j...@tradoc.fr wrote:
Le 03/03/2009 17:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
I have been already thinking about possibility to
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:32 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Spamassassin works by adding up points. Rule A is 2 points, Rule B is 2
points therefore the score is 4 points. But is this the best way to
score? I don't think so.
[...]
Anyhow - just
John Hardin wrote on Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:17:16 -0800 (PST):
(Oops! Disk failure! Well, that was trash, you can afford to lose
that.)
thanks for the laugh :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:02 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
About 98-99% of my spam in-stream scores as high, that any such proposal
results in a useless increase of the score.
The problem lies with the LOW scoring spam. Alas, these do
I used to have a couple of users who treated their Trash folder as
long-term read-message storage.
I have a user like that at $DAYJOB. I used to ask him if he kept his car
title and other important documents in the wastebasket under his desk at
home.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief,
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:02 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
About 98-99% of my spam in-stream scores as high, that any such proposal
results in a useless increase of the score.
The
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 16:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
John Hardin wrote on Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:17:16 -0800 (PST):
(Oops! Disk failure! Well, that was trash, you can afford to lose
that.)
thanks for the laugh :-)
How many of you have seen the BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell) stories?
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:25:51 +0100:
That's bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam and nonspam respectively, I
guess? Keep in mind that threshold is not the actual score, so you
aren't learning all spam with a score of 8+ then.
Right, I know. That's where the spam quarantine
Marc Perkel wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
So you're volunteering to code it up, then? ;)
--j.
I would if I were any good at perl.
I think we should evaluate if the suggested technique works and performs
better or is at least of some benefit, before trying to implement it
properly
On 4-Mar-2009, at 02:38, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
It sounds like a really good idea to me, and also like the most
reasonable way to manage self-learning meta rules.
On 03.03.09 16:43, Marc Perkel wrote:
It seems to me that the consensus is that it's worth a try. I don't
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
This would be an entirely different application, not SA, wouldn't it?
It can be developed using the same spam score logic, based subset of
all tests requiring only the subset of final data available during
classic run.
So in other words
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
This would be an entirely different application, not SA, wouldn't it?
It can be developed using the same spam score logic, based subset of
all tests requiring only the subset of final data available during
On 4-Mar-2009, at 07:06, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 17:07, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
I am considering the following:
Autolearn read mail in the inbox as ham
Autolearn mail in .Junk and .SPAM as
Could the list-admin please remove li...@billmerriam.com from the list as
it bounces all messages back to the original sender? Thanks!
(BTW: there's no list-admin address published anywhere.)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
I have a freebsd 7.0 RC3 server running postfix amavisd-new clamavd and
SpamAssassin... Having just upgraded ports I believe they are all current
releases
In this set up I am lead top believe that Amavisd-new handles the SA config
but I did not see a process for spamd so i enabled in rc.conf.
Jason,
I have a freebsd 7.0 RC3 server running postfix amavisd-new clamavd and
SpamAssassin... Having just upgraded ports I believe they are all current
releases
In this set up I am lead top believe that Amavisd-new handles the SA config
but I did not see a process for spamd so i enabled
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Albert E. Whale wrote on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:51:36 -0500:
Our Email is Filtered using the SPAMZapper. More than 50 Million
connections filtered and still counting. SPAMZapper stops Spam, Viruses,
and other Malware before it reaches your PC.
Doesn't this
decoder wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
So you're volunteering to code it up, then? ;)
I was planning to do at least some brainstorming+experiements as to
what learning methods would seem suitable and how well the method
performs, whenever I have time again. Unless someone else did that
At 07:02 04-03-2009, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
May be spamassassin should create set of tests intended for use before
replying RCPT TO: in SMTP session?
[ test based on: sending IP address, envelope sender, envelope
recipient, and name in helo/ehlo ]
SpamAssassin processes the message and
--On Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:02 PM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
May be spamassassin should create set of tests intended for use before
replying RCPT TO: in SMTP session?
Check out http://mimedefang.org/
MIMEDefang includes SA integration.
decoder wrote:
decoder wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
So you're volunteering to code it up, then? ;)
I was planning to do at least some brainstorming+experiements as to
what learning methods would seem suitable and how well the method
performs, whenever I have time again. Unless someone
Kenneth Porter sh...@sewingwitch.com wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:02 PM +0100 Andrzej Adam Filip
a...@onet.eu wrote:
May be spamassassin should create set of tests intended for use before
replying RCPT TO: in SMTP session?
Check out http://mimedefang.org/
MIMEDefang includes
34 matches
Mail list logo
