Has anyone been able to compile re2c with a gcc 2.95 compiler? I have a
gcc43 also, but Perl was compiled with 2.95, so the Rule2XSBody stuff
needs to be compiled with 2.95, too, right? Now I get this weird error:
== Building for re2c-0.13.5
make all-am
source='code.cc'
On Wed, April 1, 2009 23:22, alexus wrote:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
I had to disable it, if someone can suggest something in order to
make it work faster i'm all ears
apt-get install bind
change /etc/resolv.conf to have just
nameserver 127.0.0.1
restart bind
test with
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, April 1, 2009 23:22, alexus wrote:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
I had to disable it, if someone can suggest something in order to
make it work faster i'm all ears
apt-get install bind
change /etc/resolv.conf to have just
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Chris wrote:
Using a local caching nameserver with 127.0.0.1 as my nameserver, BIND
9.5.0-P2, Net::DNS 0.65. I notice that the slowest one shows:
[14035] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.63
and the faster one shows:
[17352] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.65
Why the
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 00:11 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Has anybody else noticed spam coming from dmulk.com?
yes, but with a comma instead of a period.
At least it was a link to www.dmulk,com
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com
On 1-Apr-2009, at 04:04, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 31-Mar-2009, at 11:13, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
And even resetting the AWL ...
Why would you reset the AWL? I can't see any circumstance on which
that would be a good idea.
I had the impression that the
As long as I can recall, SA has always had Mail::SpamAssassin::Client say:
NOTE: This interface is alpha at best... I've examined and used it,
though, and I must say it feels pretty 'beta' already to me. :) And it
just feels a lot cleaner than shelling out to spamc from within a Perl
daemon
we should probably remove that warning. it's been stable (at least in the
sense of the code not changing) for a long time now!
--j.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 13:46, Mark ad...@asarian-host.net wrote:
As long as I can recall, SA has always had Mail::SpamAssassin::Client say:
NOTE: This interface
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:36 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 08:11 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 00:11 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Has anybody else noticed spam coming from dmulk.com?
yes, but with a comma instead of a period.
indeed and with no
There are some interesting thoughts here about how to solve email's
problems ... but I'd like to put forward some thoughts...
I believe it was Cantor, of Cantor and Siegel, the first big and
_well_known_ spammer of Usenet and the Internet (but not the first
outright spammer of the internet), who
Seriously guys,
Not to sound like a total jerk, but this is REALLY far OT, it is
certainly interesting, but it's not appropriate for the SA list..
Joe Vieira
John Rudd wrote:
There are some interesting thoughts here about how to solve email's
problems ... but I'd like to put forward
-Original Message-
From: jma...@gmail.com [mailto:jma...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Justin Mason
Sent: donderdag 2 april 2009 16:03
To: Mark
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using Mail::SpamAssassin::Client
we should probably remove that warning. it's been stable (at least
On 1-Apr-2009, at 13:27, Linda Walsh wrote:
*ouch* -- you mean each message writes out an 80MB white-list file?
That's alot of I/O per message, no wonder spamd seems to be slowing
down...
No these are DB files. Data is added to them, this does not
necessitate rewriting the entire
We did something yesterday in the lines I described, which sort-of
improved the situation. Also there was a mistake in one of the things I
said:
When I reported sa-learn -magic saying 30,000 spam 300,000 ham, it
occurred that I was quoting the value for our secondary MX. The primary MX
has a
nope ;)
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 16:36, Mark ad...@asarian-host.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: jma...@gmail.com [mailto:jma...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Justin Mason
Sent: donderdag 2 april 2009 16:03
To: Mark
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using
On 1-Apr-2009, at 18:23, Aran wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb3
This is not even close to being the latest version. This is *years*
old.
Still, like Karsten said, your problem is likely something else. Have
you provided a pastebin of any false negatives yet?
--
Ah, you're a
On 1-Apr-2009, at 01:55, John GALLET wrote:
[repost from yesterday, I was not using the correct From address for
this list...]
Yes, it means that every Received: header in an email is valid with
a valid IP, valid configuration (whatever that is deemed to be),
and valid DNS. Only servers
On 1-Apr-2009, at 16:53, mouss wrote:
do you guys know that designing a protocole is at least as hard as
writing code? now, is there still anyone around who does believe in
perfect code?
protocol design is actually harder:
This is precisely why it hasn't happened, and why the mail system is,
On 2-Apr-2009, at 11:17, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
- clean the AWL of all entries with a single occurrence (including
those u...@ourdomain|x.y where x.y is NOT our IP)
Probably not a good idea. I would think a lot of those would be SPAM
indicators you flushed out of your AWL. However:
LuKreme wrote:
On 1-Apr-2009, at 13:27, Linda Walsh wrote:
*ouch* -- you mean each message writes out an 80MB white-list file?
That's alot of I/O per message, no wonder spamd seems to be slowing
down...
No these are DB files. Data is added to them, this does not
necessitate
We're receiving a bunch of mail from domains that appear built for
spamming.
Here's an example.
pastelmedal.com spam comes from 66.132.203.125. This address isn't
listed by spamhaus, surbl, or any of 122 blacklists at mxtoolbox.com.
The email is here:
http://www.midcoast.com/~jp/p.txt
I get
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders for my
server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
'btinternet.com.multi.uribl.com/A/IN': 208.67.220.220#53
I am assuming it is SpamAssassin causing this but I could
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 16:20 -0400, jp wrote:
We're receiving a bunch of mail from domains that appear built for
spamming.
Here's an example.
pastelmedal.com spam comes from 66.132.203.125. This address isn't
listed by spamhaus, surbl, or any of 122 blacklists at mxtoolbox.com.
Yup.
On 4/2/2009 10:34 PM, Mike Bostock wrote:
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders for my
server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
'btinternet.com.multi.uribl.com/A/IN': 208.67.220.220#53
I am assuming
body AE_STOP_REMOVE5/\bwish\bto\bend\b.{0,20}(?: ... )/i
I guess you don't get a lot of hits for that one. ;)
\b is a zero-width assertion, matching a word boundary, but not matching
an actual character. /wish\bto/ will never match...
--
char
Linda Walsh skrev:
Yeah -- then this refers back to the bug about there being no way to prune
that file -- it just slowly grows and needs to be read in when spamd
starts(?)
No.
The AWL is stored in a database, and spamd does not read the whole
database into memory. It just looks up and
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 23:08 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
body AE_STOP_REMOVE5/\bwish\bto\bend\b.{0,20}(?: ... )/i
I guess you don't get a lot of hits for that one. ;)
\b is a zero-width assertion, matching a word boundary, but not matching
an actual character. /wish\bto/
http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=3423page=1
Uribl should probaly get an rsync of the zones, if they are doing 50mm
queries a day, imagine what will hit urlbl servers directly, since opendns
caches the queries.
(I think a opendns does this with some of the more
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:34:26 +0100
Mike Bostock spamt...@yew-tree.co.uk wrote:
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders
for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
At 02:52 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:
Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for
squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at
browsers like spelling correction, and redirecting failures to it's own
web servers. The latter presumably breaks the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, jp wrote:
I get email from lots of different domains that have the same USPS
mailing address(es) listed, either in Denver CO or Wilmington DE.
Some specific rules for those addresses, perhaps?
Which leads to the question: would having something analogous to URIBL for
From: Mark [mailto:ad...@asarian-host.net]
Sent: donderdag 2 april 2009 21:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Annoying -w errors in syslog
To answer my own question, in log_message, in Logger.pm, I added this,
prior to when the message is being written:
return if
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Uribl should probaly get an rsync of the zones, if they are doing 50mm
queries a day, imagine what will hit urlbl servers directly, since opendns
caches the queries.
(I think a opendns does this with some of the more popular zones anyway)
This would be good for
In your message regarding Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin dated 02/04/2009,
Evan Platt said ...
EP- At 02:52 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:
Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for
squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at
browsers like spelling
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I have
squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it and go back to
using my ISP's DNS servers as forwarders.
You still need to keep an eye on it. Several (larger) ISPs have
On 2-Apr-2009, at 14:10, Linda Walsh wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 1-Apr-2009, at 13:27, Linda Walsh wrote:
*ouch* -- you mean each message writes out an 80MB white-list
file? That's alot of I/O per message, no wonder spamd seems to be
slowing down...
No these are DB files. Data is
On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I
have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it
and go back to using my ISP's DNS servers as forwarders.
bind works better without forwarders, it common error to
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST)
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I
have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it
and go back to using my ISP's DNS
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:52, RW wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:34:26 +0100
Mike Bostock spamt...@yew-tree.co.uk wrote:
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders
for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote:
I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving
EVERYTHING - blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc.
This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing
who set it up for their system. I used OpenDNS for quite a while on
On Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:13 PM -0600 LuKreme krem...@kreme.com
wrote:
You should be sending mail out through your ISP which should be accepting
your outbound mail as from you since they know who you are. Once your
ISP (with their correctly configured SASL enabled mailserver) passes it
On Fri, April 3, 2009 02:24, LuKreme wrote:
Or am I wrong? I could be wrong.
Bittorrent is slow to :)
firefox with proxy to squid on a host with multi-isp uplinks is bad
also, since it just use one isp lines that are slow
dns is udp, and works very fast if one let it, what uribl can do is
to
Hi all,
curious, is there any way to add a header showing the RelayCountries? Any
help would be appreciated.
TIA
--
Gary
On 1-Apr-2009, at 13:12, Linda Walsh wrote:
I found, BURIED, in the doc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf the broken,
primitive rules for white/black list patterns allowed:
Whitelist and blacklist addresses are now file-glob-style
patterns,
so fri...@somewhere.com,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:32 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote:
I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving EVERYTHING -
blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc.
This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing who
On 1-Apr-2009, at 22:00, Matt Kettler wrote:
white/blacklist entries can be created by untrusted end users, who
could abuse them to DoS your mailserver.
then it should be an option. Only TRUSTED end-users have access to a
shell and to user_prefs on my system (and I suspect on lots of other
At 05:32 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote:
I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving
EVERYTHING - blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc.
This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing
who set it up for their system. I used
Gary wrote:
Hi all,
curious, is there any way to add a header showing the RelayCountries? Any
help would be appreciated.
TIA
In reasonably recent versions of SA:
add_header all Relay-Country _RELAYCOUNTRY_
48 matches
Mail list logo
