LuKreme wrote:
On 1-Apr-2009, at 13:27, Linda Walsh wrote:
*ouch* -- you mean each message writes out an 80MB white-list file?
That's alot of I/O per message, no wonder spamd seems to be slowing
down...
Nooooo.... these are DB files. Data is added to them, this does not
necessitate rewriting the entire file.
---
Yeah -- then this refers back to the bug about there being no way to prune
that file -- it just slowly grows and needs to be read in when spamd starts(?)
and spamd needs to keep that info around as the basis for its AWL scoring, no?
So the only real harm is the increased read-initialization and the run-time
AWL length?
