Re: RulesDuJour

Anshul Chauhan wrote: > we have to copy KAM.cf to /usr/share/spamassassin only for its > integration with spamassassin or something else is to done > > I'm using spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el4.rf on Centos4.7 Any add-on rules should be placed in the same directory as your local.cf (ie: /etc/mail/spamas

Re: New type of spam... (very curious)

On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 00:46 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > For some seconds I have goten this spam, which has passed my spmassassin > but was hit by a seperated ZEN rule in procmail: > > > Return-Path: soria.h.steven...@gmail.com > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on >

Re: New type of spam... (very curious)

On Tue, June 30, 2009 00:46, Michelle Konzack wrote: > For some seconds I have goten this spam, which has passed my spmassassin > but was hit by a seperated ZEN rule in procmail: what ip ? imho ipv6 is still not stable in any sa versions, and this might be your problem -- xpoint

Re: New type of spam... (very curious)

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:46:00 +0200 Michelle Konzack wrote: > For some seconds I have goten this spam, which has passed my > spmassassin but was hit by a seperated ZEN rule in procmail: please use a pastebin when pasting things like email headers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastebin http://pa

Re: SA on Windows (XP) with Cygwin

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:20:57 -0500 René Berber wrote: > The alternative, as said before, is fetchmail (or similar: fdm, > animail, mailfiter, etc.) Its more complicated because you also need > to install and configure procmail, FWIW you don't actually need procmail In this context getmail cou

Re: SA on Windows (XP) with Cygwin

Lee wrote: > Hello Kevin, > > I agree with you regarding my ambitions V ability. I have decided to > give up. I do however still want to find something for free and using > online lookups, but I appreciate that's not for here. I'm aware I am > resisting one or two commercial desktop solutions app

New type of spam... (very curious)

For some seconds I have goten this spam, which has passed my spmassassin but was hit by a seperated ZEN rule in procmail: Return-Path: soria.h.steven...@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on samba3.private.tamay-dogan.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, s

note for those tracking SVN trunk

[forwarded from bugzilla] https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6139 --- Comment #6 from Justin Mason  2009-06-29 15:00:53 PST --- actually, it's worse than that.  Every SVN checkout needs the following, it seems: svn propdel svn:externals . ; rm -rf rulesrc ; svn up sorry fo

Re: SA on Windows (XP) with Cygwin

Hello Kevin, I agree with you regarding my ambitions V ability. I have decided to give up. I do however still want to find something for free and using online lookups, but I appreciate that's not for here. I'm aware I am resisting one or two commercial desktop solutions apparently offering wh

ExtractText plugin

Hello! For anyone who likes to test stuff, I've uploaded my plugin that extracts text from documents to I started writing last week, so it hasn't been heavily tested yet, but it has been running here over the weekend with no showstopping

Re: vpopmail / qmail testers needed

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 17:28, RobertH wrote: > >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:24 AM >> To: SpamAssassin Users List >> Subject: vpopmail / qmail testers needed >> >> hi folks.  could someone using vpopmail/qmail please test this patch: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=

RE: [NEW SPAM FLOOD] www.shopXX.net

>>> "Benny Pedersen" 06/28/09 12:42 AM >>> >On Sun, June 28, 2009 05:38, Cory Hawkless wrote: >> I agree, wouldn't it be easier to uniformly feed all of these type of URL's >> though the already existing SA filters. As Jason suggested maybe by >> collapsing whitespaces? > >lets redefine how a url

RE: vpopmail / qmail testers needed

> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:24 AM > To: SpamAssassin Users List > Subject: vpopmail / qmail testers needed > > hi folks. could someone using vpopmail/qmail please test this patch: > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 > (patch id 4432) > > A fix to vpopmail/qmail

vpopmail / qmail testers needed

hi folks. could someone using vpopmail/qmail please test this patch: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 (patch id 4432) A fix to vpopmail/qmail support is unlikely to make it into 3.3.0 without testers. --j.

Re: SA on Windows (XP) with Cygwin

Thanks for the below, Martin. Maybe so far I missed it on the web, but that's the clearest description I've come across and actually makes sense to me. :) Lee Martin Gregorie wrote: The main benefit for low volume (personal) mail is that using spamc/spamd avoids the considerable start/stop

Re: SA on Windows (XP) with Cygwin

On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 02:45 +0100, Lee wrote: > I've yet to grasp the purpose of SpamC and/or SpamD on Windows in my > kind of scenario. I've seen mention of them a lot in my web searches, > but all I think I have yet grasped is that SpamC makes the mail > filtering faster due to a multi threade

Re: RulesDuJour

we have to copy KAM.cf to /usr/share/spamassassin only for its integration with spamassassin or something else is to done I'm using spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el4.rf on Centos4.7 Warm Regards, Anshul Chauhan "Dream is not what you see while sleep, it's the thing that does not let you sleep." On Sat,