-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/26/09 20:01, quoth RW:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:07:12 -0400
> "Michael W. Cocke" wrote:
>
>> There doesn't seem to be a web interface to subscribe/unscribe from
>> this list. The email address
>> "users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org" co
snowweb wrote:
>
>
> I was wondering whether it was a user issue earlier, but I tried sa-learn
> --username=user --dump magic and it seemed to give the same result as the
> default user. I tried various different users (even made some up!) but it
> didn't complain - still gave me the same dump
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:07:12 -0400
"Michael W. Cocke" wrote:
>
> There doesn't seem to be a web interface to subscribe/unscribe from
> this list. The email address
> "users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org" complains that my IP
> address is dynamic (which is why I use dyndns.org, thank you
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
>
> There doesn't seem to be a web interface to subscribe/unscribe from
> this list. The email address
> "users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org" complains that my IP
> address is dynamic (which is why I use dyndns.org, thank you very
> much.) And
On Sun, July 26, 2009 00:07, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
> I'm setting up filters (ironically using spamassassin) to block this
> list, but frankly it strikes me as impolite to filter this list -
> isn't there a way to unsubscribe?
how did you subscribe ? ;)
help sent to you
--
xpoint
There doesn't seem to be a web interface to subscribe/unscribe from
this list. The email address
"users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org" complains that my IP
address is dynamic (which is why I use dyndns.org, thank you very
much.) And on that subject, am I the only person who thinks that
b
Paweł Tęcza a écrit :
> Hello Folks,
>
> Did you also get many spams from "United-MAP, a dynamic company with
> rapid development, with a united team of professionals in its core."? :)
> Or maybe this new spam flood is only Poland targeted?
>
or maybe we don't see them because they come from cli
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> One can also use
>
> bayes_sql_override_username spam
>
> in local.cf, if the bayes is in a SQL database. I have that, and there
> seems to be no difference if I use -u or not.
>
>
I was wondering whether it was a user issue earlier, but I tried sa-learn
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 17:19 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 16:07 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote:
... (?:c\s?o\s?m|n\s?e\s?t|o\s?r\s?g)[[:punct:]]?\b/i
That part is superfluo
>> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
>>>
0.000 0258 0 non-token data:
nspam
0.000 0160 0 non-token data:
nham
>>>
>>> try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes
>>>
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
>>
>>> 0.000 0258 0 non-token data:
>>> nspam
>>> 0.000 0160 0 non-token data:
>>> nham
>>
>> try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
>>
>> so
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
>
>> 0.000 0258 0 non-token data: nspam
>> 0.000 0160 0 non-token data: nham
>
> try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
>
> so if less then 1000 i
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 17:19 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 16:07 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> > ... (?:c\s?o\s?m|n\s?e\s?t|o\s?r\s?g)[[:punct:]]?\b/i
>
> That part is superfluous. If it matches a punctuation char, its o
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 16:07 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> ... (?:c\s?o\s?m|n\s?e\s?t|o\s?r\s?g)[[:punct:]]?\b/i
That part is superfluous. If it matches a punctuation char, its optional
variant (matching no char) will make the \b word boundary matc
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:29, snowweb wrote:
> 0.000 0258 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 0160 0 non-token data: nham
try to have them more or less equal to have good bayes db
so if less then 1000 in diff is fine
if more then 1000 adjust lea
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:10, snowweb wrote:
>> Sorry Benny, my message wasn't very clear (although your information was
>> interesting). However, my main concern is that it is not using bayes to
>> analyse the messages, let alone to learn from them.
>
> sa-learn --
On Sun, July 26, 2009 15:10, snowweb wrote:
> Sorry Benny, my message wasn't very clear (although your information was
> interesting). However, my main concern is that it is not using bayes to
> analyse the messages, let alone to learn from them.
sa-learn --dump magic
> I've now trained bayes wi
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 04:43, snowweb wrote:
>>
>> In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>>
>> bayes_auto_learn 1
>>
>> But when I examine the message headers,
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7
>> tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
>> MIME_HTML_ON
On Sun, July 26, 2009 14:31, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Um, that's not going to do anything except generate errors Benny.
yes, its early in the morning here local time atleast for me, and i did not
think what i writed above, but i discowered the error
later, imho whitelist_from should be removed from
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 05:07, snowweb wrote:
>
>> I can't understand what is going on here! How can it get a score like that?
>> The message contained just an image and a link.
>>
>
> add
> score whitelist_from 0.1
>
> in user_prefs or local.cf
>
> restart spamd
>
>
On Sun, July 26, 2009 14:18, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, July 26, 2009 05:07, snowweb wrote:
>> I can't understand what is going on here! How can it get a score like that?
>> The message contained just an image and a link.
>
> add
> score whitelist_from 0.1
ups USER_IN_WHITELIST not whitelist
On Sun, July 26, 2009 05:07, snowweb wrote:
> I can't understand what is going on here! How can it get a score like that?
> The message contained just an image and a link.
add
score whitelist_from 0.1
in user_prefs or local.cf
restart spamd
--
xpoint
On Sun, July 26, 2009 04:43, snowweb wrote:
>
> In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
> bayes_auto_learn 1
>
> But when I examine the message headers,
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.7
> tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
> MIME_HTML_ONLY,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.2.4
23 matches
Mail list logo
