MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After another day of hacking, I have a handful of general questions
> that I hoped you could help me to answer.
>
> - How can I find the score of a particular rule, without having to use
> grep? I'm concerned that I might find it at some score, only for it to
> be red
Hi,
After another day of hacking, I have a handful of general questions
that I hoped you could help me to answer.
- How can I find the score of a particular rule, without having to use
grep? I'm concerned that I might find it at some score, only for it to
be redefined somewhere else that I didn't
My bios doesn't allow shutting off HT, but does allow turning off
2 or 3 cores (allowing dual or single) -- I'd rather see that type
of feature at runtime - allowing system load to decide whether to activate
another core -- though the diff on my 2.6GHZ in power consumption
when from about 157 wat
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:47 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 03:27 PM 8/7/2009, you wrote:
> >I sent a spam report to abuse and postmaster at webexmailer.com last
> >night. This morning I received this failure message for both abuse and
> >postmaster:
> >
> >Unable to deliver message to the following
On 8/6/09 11:44 PM, Henrik K wrote:
Pretty good here..
OVERALLSPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
024942799550.238 0.000.00 (all messages)
0.676 2.7504 0.02880.990 0.000.01 T_TAB_IN_FROM
For some reason all the FPs appeared to come throug
At 03:27 PM 8/7/2009, you wrote:
I sent a spam report to abuse and postmaster at webexmailer.com last
night. This morning I received this failure message for both abuse and
postmaster:
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the
message was forwarded more than the maximum
I sent a spam report to abuse and postmaster at webexmailer.com last
night. This morning I received this failure message for both abuse and
postmaster:
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the
message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could
indicate
On 1 Aug 2009, Linda Walsh stated:
>
>
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> Not sure about that - AFAICT, it's exactly the same technology. (I
>> haven't done in exhaustive tests though).
>
>
> Supposedly 'Very' different (I hope)...
Oh yes. I have a P4 here (2GHz Northwood), and two Nehalems (one
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I've read the "sender callouts" page and I don't see any evidence that it
>> mentions the SAV problem.
On 07.08.09 15:33, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> I went to the front page, and then clicked "Sender Callouts" ... The
> very first line says:
>
> "Sendercallouts (Se
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:20 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >>> char
> >>> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> >>> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i >>> c<<=1:
> >>> (c=*++x); c&128 && (
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:20 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> > > > char
> > > > *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> > > > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i > > > c<<=1:
> > > > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){
> > >
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
How did you get line noise from your modem to look so much like perl co
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I hope those "good" SAV users are also using some good filtering policy
(reject machines w/o DNS, machines in blacklists, SPF fails) before they are
doing SAV, otherwise they just DoS the victims...
(nod) These arguments (on this list :) convinc
> How do I add a mail server as trusted and score it
> negative?
>
> I need to have mail from a specific site not tagged as
> spam. I have the domain name and the IP.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wes
whitelist_from_rcvd domain IP
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, twofers wrote:
How do I add a mail server as trusted and score it negative?
?I need to have mail from a specific site not tagged as spam. I have the
domain name and the IP.
The best way is to have your MTA recognize mail from that site and not
pass it to SA in the first p
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Do you say that backscatterer list contains IPs of servers that do _not_
send backscatter but are doing SAV? Do you have any proofs about that?
The proof is on the front page of http://www.backscatterer.org/ in big
red letters: "Every IP which backscatters or do
> > char
> > *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i > c<<=1:
> > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> > }}}
>
> How did you get line noise from your modem to loo
On 07.08.09 06:55, Marc Perkel wrote:
Oh, please, why html only?
>> On 06.08.09 15:37, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>> This might be an advanced concept for you but what I meant was -
>>> deliberately send spam. Everyone doing sender verification is someone
>>> who is trying to BLOCK spam, and therefore a
> * Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> > On 06.08.09 15:37, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > > This might be an advanced concept for you but what I meant was -
> > > deliberately send spam. Everyone doing sender verification is someone
> > > who is trying to BLOCK spam, and therefore are the good guys. I also
Marc Perkel wrote:
What they should do is return different codes to indicate what got them
on the list. SAV is not backscatter. So if it is from <> and there is
DATA then it's someone who is sending bad bounce messages to faked
sender addresses. But if there is nod DATA then it's SAV. These s
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> Do you say that backscatterer list contains IPs of servers that do _not_
>> send backscatter but are doing SAV? Do you have any proofs about that?
On 07.08.09 14:37, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> The proof is on the front page of http://www.backscatterer.org/ in big
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 06.08.09 15:37, Marc Perkel wrote:
This might be an advanced concept for you but what I meant was -
deliberately send spam. Everyone doing sender verification is someone
who is trying to BLOCK spam, and therefore are the good guys. I also
tr
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Do you say that backscatterer list contains IPs of servers that do _not_
send backscatter but are doing SAV? Do you have any proofs about that?
The proof is on the front page of http://www.backscatterer.org/ in big
red letters: "Every IP which backscatters or doe
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> On 06.08.09 15:37, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > This might be an advanced concept for you but what I meant was -
> > deliberately send spam. Everyone doing sender verification is someone
> > who is trying to BLOCK spam, and therefore are the good guys. I also
> > track
On 06.08.09 15:37, Marc Perkel wrote:
> This might be an advanced concept for you but what I meant was -
> deliberately send spam. Everyone doing sender verification is someone
> who is trying to BLOCK spam, and therefore are the good guys. I also
> track SAV calls and I use it as a WHITE lis
How do I add a mail server as trusted and score it negative?
I need to have mail from a specific site not tagged as spam. I have the domain
name and the IP.
Thanks,
Wes
< header L_TAB_IN_FROM ALL =~ /\nFrom:\t/s
-> header L_TAB_IN_FROM From:raw =~ /^\t/m
Mark
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:46:46 -0400
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I find ordinary header and meta rules are all I need:
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/f5e5232d1
>
> Among those rules you have:
>
> meta RELAYCOUNTRY_MED ! RELAYCOUNTRY_HIGH && (
> __RELAYCOUNTRY_AF || __RELAYCOUNTRY_AS |
28 matches
Mail list logo
