> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> I've read the "sender callouts" page and I don't see any evidence that it >> mentions the SAV problem.
On 07.08.09 15:33, Mike Cardwell wrote: > I went to the front page, and then clicked "Sender Callouts" ... The > very first line says: > > "Sendercallouts (Sender Verify / SAV) - Why it is abusive" > > The second line says: > > "This is for all persons who think SENDER CALLOUTS are viable." > > The third line says: > > "We will explain why we consider sender callouts abusive." > > The rest of the page describes in detail the problems with SAV. > > Yet you can't see that it even mentions the SAV problem? the title (not <title>) is the only place it mentions SAV. all the rest mentions "sender callouts" which is imho not clear. Especially the part that mentions bidirectional verify, expecting that the provided rcpt will be used for SAV sender (many SAV implementations use mail from:<>) >> I think it mentions the mailing back, not the SAV, >> and I'm interested if the backscatterer.org blacklists IPs with SAV or only >> those that send real mails... > > It does both. The minimal amount of text on the front page couldn't be > clearer about that ... I think it could -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
