> >
> >
> > > header FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_DX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
> > > ...
> > > header HELO_MISC_IPX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
> > >
> > Possibly this is down to their running on the wrong boundary, these
> > should be on the internal network boundary.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:31:32AM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:33:29 +0100
> Cedric Knight wrote:
>
>
> > header FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_DX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
> > ...
> > header HELO_MISC_IPX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
> >
> Possibly this is down to t
On 7-Aug-2009, at 11:20, Charles Gregory wrote:
Okay, so now I'm curious. What *IS* that chunk of code?
If you compile it and run it you will see that the putchar() prints
out his email address.
--
When the routine bites hard / and ambitions are low
And the resentment rides high / but emoti
On 6-Aug-2009, at 11:28, Terry Carmen wrote:
It actually works very well with very small and very large distances.
I suppose it COULD.
Anything that I receive from an IP address located with maybe 50
miles of my
location is almost 100% guaranteed Ham. However, I've never received
even a
s
On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:33:29 +0100
Cedric Knight wrote:
> header FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_DX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
> ...
> header HELO_MISC_IPX-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
>
Possibly this is down to their running on the wrong boundary, these
should be on the internal ne
Le lundi 10 août 2009 19:15:15, Cedric Knight a écrit :
> Stefan wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 07:36:54 schrieb Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
> >> Hi SAs,
> >>
> >> Well, after reading this link
> >> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/sa-learn.html I'm still
> >> looking for an easy-
On 5-Aug-2009, at 05:28, Steve Freegard wrote:
header __COUNT_RCPTS ToCc =~ /(?:[^@,\...@[^@,\s]+)/
tflags __COUNT_RCPTS multiple
meta RCPTS_5_10 (__COUNT_RCPTS >= 5 && __COUNT_RCPTS <= 10)
meta RCPTS_5_10 (__COUNT_RCPTS >= 5)
score RCPTS_5_10 1.0
describe RCPTS_5_10 Message has 5 to 10 re
Stefan wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 07:36:54 schrieb Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
>> Hi SAs,
>>
>> Well, after reading this link
>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/sa-learn.html I'm still
>> looking for an easy-way to let my mortal users to train our antispam. I
>> was thinking a
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 09.08.09 11:33, Cedric Knight wrote:
>> I'm using Bayes and network tests, and have found a few rules with a
>> good ratio of ham to spam, but that score only 0.001 in the default
rules.
>
> apparently there's no use for them alone and the score isn't 0 just
becau
On 9-Aug-2009, at 03:36, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
We allow authenticated relaying from our users even if they do not
use our IP ranges and we see much less spam,
Exactly.
and it is much easier to block the authenticated user than finding
out who exactly is sending mail from dynamically
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it
happens about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a
hold of someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to
send out spam.
"So
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.08.09 11:07, Charles Gregory wrote:
IMNSHO You shouldn't. You should only allow *your* customers with pop
e-mail accounts on *your* servers to send mail.
1.
If more customers send spam from the same IP address without authentiaction,
you
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it happens
about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a hold of
someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to send out spam.
"Somehow" is not that hard t
Res wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Aha, so this is your point? You accept mail from your IP addresses,
but not
from your customers roaming elsewhere? Bad for you. It was already
discussed
here - you are going the wrong way.
Not bad for me, we used to do this, it
Hello,
I already sent this messages but didn't get any reply at the moment. So I'm
sending it back hoping it could wake up some spamassassin guru.
Please if the message is not understandable, or not posted in the right
place... let me know I'll do what's needed.
I am trying to setup spamass
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.08.09 11:24, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I can't speak for others but at my main job (20K+ email accounts) it
happens about once every 2 month's or so. Some how the spammer gets a
hold of someone's password and either uses smtp-auth or webmail to send
out spa
> Charles Gregory wrote:
>> To be truthful, I have been doing this by default here, as well, but
>> find that it creates some problems for some users. So I am thinking
>> about opening up SMTP-AUTH ports. Trouble is (and its semi-relevance to
>> this list) I have to wonder if I am opening myse
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Res wrote:
>> if I'm in charge of the network for say this countries 5th largest
>> ISP, why SHOULD I allow customers of say our countries largest, or 25th
>> largest relay their mail via my systems...
On 10.08.09 11:07, Charles Gregory wrote:
> IMNSHO You shouldn't. Y
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Res wrote:
To be truthful, I have been doing this by default here, as well, but
find that it creates some problems for some users. So I am thinking
about opening up SMTP-AUTH ports. Trouble is (and its semi-relevance to
this list) I have to wonder if
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Res wrote:
if I'm in charge of the network for say this countries 5th largest
ISP, why SHOULD I allow customers of say our countries largest, or 25th
largest relay their mail via my systems...
IMNSHO You shouldn't. You should only allow *your* customers with pop
e-mai
> Stefan wrote:
> This may not be ideal, but in Thunderbird, you can drag
> messages between mailboxes. You could setup each user to
> have access to their own account and the two learning
> mailboxes. You can then have your users drag the false
> positives/negatives to the appropriate box. I have
Stefan wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 07:36:54 schrieb Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
Hi SAs,
Well, after reading this link
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/sa-learn.html I'm still
looking for an easy-way to let my mortal users to train our antispam. I
was thinking a mailbox such
Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 07:36:54 schrieb Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
> Hi SAs,
>
> Well, after reading this link
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/sa-learn.html I'm still
> looking for an easy-way to let my mortal users to train our antispam. I
> was thinking a mailbox such as h...
23 matches
Mail list logo
