Hi,
> On Saturday August 29 2009 19:47:32 R-Elists wrote:
>> have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production servers
>> to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release?
>
> We are certainly one of them (actually running CVS head,
> which is pretty close to alpha2). About 1000 users here.
Hi,
> I am getting rather tired from messages spamming porn-portals. They typically
> originate from hotmail.com, and advertise a porn-portal based on
> google.com/groups, google.com/reader, groups.yahoo.com, pipes.yahoo.com,
> spaces.live.com, docs.google.com, sites.google.com and livejournal.com
On Saturday August 29 2009 19:47:32 R-Elists wrote:
> have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production servers
> to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release?
We are certainly one of them (actually running CVS head,
which is pretty close to alpha2). About 1000 users here.
Mark
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to write a how-to type article about setting up email servers
correctly with an eye on avoiding getting blocked by spam filters.
Here's what I have so far.
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Keeping_Your_Server_Off_Black_Lists
Looking for more ideas and sug
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> Yes, it is indeed likely prone to FPs on its own, unless very strictly
> meta'ed for some special cases, and it actually also is likely bound to
> expire soon. Obfuscation techniques like this usually are subject to
> change, quite rapidly, and I'd bet you'll soo
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 10:15 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > tflags __COMMA multiple
> > meta __COMMA_4 __COMMA >= 4
>
> Works wonders. I chose three, and was almost inclined to score on just this
> rule, if it wasn't for people discussing Dave Dee, Dozy, B
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Mynabbler wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
header __COMMA Subject =~ /,/
tflags __COMMA multiple
meta __COMMA_4 __COMMA >= 4
Works wonders. I chose three, and was almost inclined to score on just this
rule, if it wasn't for people discussing Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky,
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 06:41 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
The combo 'Portal link found' and subject could still be used, provided
I have a rule that is able to count the number of comma's in a subject.
Is there a way to do such a thing?
have many, or any of you folks on the list migrated your production servers
to the 3.3.0 alpha 2 or later release?
- rh
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Mynabbler wrote:
>
>
> Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
> >
> > header __COMMA Subject =~ /,/
> > tflags __COMMA multiple
> > meta __COMMA_4 __COMMA >= 4
> >
>
> Works wonders. I chose three, and was almost inclined to score on
> just this rule, if it
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:51:23 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 11:11 -0500, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> > Hi all, I was wondering if youcand telme what tcp port sa-update
> > use. My fwadmin will close free gateway
>
> DNS port 53, UDP and TCP. HTTP port 80, TCP.
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> header __COMMA Subject =~ /,/
> tflags __COMMA multiple
> meta __COMMA_4 __COMMA >= 4
>
Works wonders. I chose three, and was almost inclined to score on just this
rule, if it wasn't for people discussing Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich
:) It scores howev
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Cannot recall seeing a follow up to John H new rules; Are they available
now or still under test review ?
As of this morning they are doing well enough in nightly masscheck to be
included in autopublication (for 3.3.0 only, sadly). They should work ju
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 11:11 -0500, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> Hi all, I was wondering if youcand telme what tcp port sa-update use. My
> fwadmin will close free gateway
DNS port 53, UDP and TCP. HTTP port 80, TCP.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\
Hi there,
I'm new here, first message, which I won't messed up, please tell me if I am! :)
Ok, I -think- I have a problem with my configuration of spamassassin. I have a
lot of messages passing through as "not spam" even if it's obvious spam.
The thing is I think somewhere, SA if skipping t
Hi all, I was wondering if youcand telme what tcp port sa-update use. My
fwadmin will close free gateway
Regards,
LD
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 06:41 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> The combo 'Portal link found' and subject could still be used, provided I
> have a rule that is able to count the number of comma's in a subject. Is
> there a way to do such a thing?
header __COMMA Subject =~ /,/
tflags __COMMA
On Sat 29 Aug 2009 03:41:00 PM CEST, Mynabbler wrote
http://pastebin.com/m5c18ffdd
The combo 'Portal link found' and subject could still be used, provided I
have a rule that is able to count the number of comma's in a subject. Is
there a way to do such a thing?
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/l
I am getting rather tired from messages spamming porn-portals. They typically
originate from hotmail.com, and advertise a porn-portal based on
google.com/groups, google.com/reader, groups.yahoo.com, pipes.yahoo.com,
spaces.live.com, docs.google.com, sites.google.com and livejournal.com.
Up until
Hi,
Cannot recall seeing a follow up to John H new rules; Are they available now or
still under test review ?
Best Regards,
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and is believed to be clean.
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
20 matches
Mail list logo