On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 00:23 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 24-Nov-2009, at 15:23, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> > From: LuKreme
> >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >
> >>> Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
> >
> >> We've been through this before. On m
On 11/25/2009 3:56 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Justin Mason wrote:
that's normal. can be ignored
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 21:04, Yet Another Ninja
wrote:
When running masscheck calling:
/home/mc/masscheck/spamassassin/trunk/masses && nice ./mass-check \
--cf='loadplugin
On 24-Nov-2009, at 15:23, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> From: LuKreme
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>
>>> Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
>
>> We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong
>> indicator of spam. It doe
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Justin Mason wrote:
that's normal. can be ignored
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 21:04, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
When running masscheck calling:
/home/mc/masscheck/spamassassin/trunk/masses && nice ./mass-check \
--cf='loadplugin Dumptext plugins/Dumptext.pm' \
--cf='loadpl
Hi,
> I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring
> settings, but
> in particular ED image spam with the word 'viagra' spelled correctly in the
> sender and/or
> subject headers. I have settings for tagging and auto discard with a 15 point
> spread, and
I wouldn't
From: "Jeff Mincy"
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/November/24 14:23
From: LuKreme
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:08:11 -0700
On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
We've been through this before. On my mail, ha
that's normal. can be ignored
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 21:04, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> When running masscheck calling:
>
> /home/mc/masscheck/spamassassin/trunk/masses && nice ./mass-check \
> --cf='loadplugin Dumptext plugins/Dumptext.pm' \
> --cf='loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Che
From: LuKreme
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:08:11 -0700
On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong
indicator of spam.
When running masscheck calling:
/home/mc/masscheck/spamassassin/trunk/masses && nice ./mass-check \
--cf='loadplugin Dumptext plugins/Dumptext.pm' \
--cf='loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check' \
-j=2 -n -o --rules='^(?!JM_SOUGHT)(?!T_JM_SOUGHT)' \
spam:dir:/home/mc/Maildir/.SPAM/c
On 11/24/2009 7:10 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
seems simpler than adding 1 domains to freemail's config .-)
that why i like to change it to be paidmail.pm with lists of paid domains
got it now ? :)
spammers can get any free domai
On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
seems simpler than adding 1 domains to freemail's config .-)
that why i like to change it to be paidmail.pm with lists of paid domains
got it now ? :)
spammers can get any free domain and it can continue as a freemail,
but whe
On 11/24/2009 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and cron'd
replication lag...
just one problem with freemail it should list all domain as freemail as
default, unless there is a cl
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Hardin wrote:
Granted, but in metas such a test can be useful:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FTO_NO&srcpath=jhardin
Every now and then, someone posts a link like this one, and I find myself
looking at a kind of 'index' page that frankly doesn't mean a thing t
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:22 -0800, R-Elists wrote:
> didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
> extra factor of protection to continue development?
I'm using it with a locally sourced set of "bad actors". Unfortunately,
I don't believe I'm allow to share the data.
Hi,
> Obviously every admin has to decide what to block and not
> to block, but I just wanted to add a data point. I try
> not to block stuff my users have signed up for, as inane
> as the messages may be (to me).
The trouble is, which users have actually subscribed and wish to
receive free credi
John Tice wrote:
I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring
settings, but in particular ED image spam with the word '' spelled correctly in
the sender and/or subject headers. I have settings for tagging and auto discard
with a 15 point spread, and this kind of
I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring
settings, but in particular ED image spam with the word 'viagra' spelled
correctly in the sender and/or subject headers. I have settings for tagging and
auto discard with a 15 point spread, and this kind of stuff used to
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and
cron'd replication lag...
just one problem with freemail it should list all domain as freemail
as default, unless there is a clear sign of payment to get it
otherway aro
On tir 24 nov 2009 18:22:25 CET, R-Elists wrote
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
+1
even without more devel on it, what does miss ?
so far i have just seen one big problem with it, dns servers / mirror
On 11/24/2009 6:22 PM, R-Elists wrote:
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
- rh
Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and cron'd
replication lag...
Matt Garretson wrote:
> FWIW, a good number of those in your list I'm pretty sure
> are legit opt-in "newsletters" (term used loosely... they
> mainly consist of ads and "special offers"). Sure, the're
Followup to myself: I have no opinion on the HABEAS issue,
but a couple years ago I decided
didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an
extra factor of protection to continue development?
- rh
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> Although these don't all appear to be business related, very few would
> be marked as spam without the HABEAS_ACCREDITED bonus.
> First, the suspicious ones:
> [snip]
FWIW, a good number of those in your list I'm pretty sure
are legit opt-in "newsletters" (term used lo
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Mark Hedges wrote:
OMG I am SO DUMB - I had skip_rbl_checks set in my personal
userconf. DUH.
(nod) Thanks for posting the full logs for both messages.
Once the problem is properly defined, the solution is usually
not too hard to find (though occasionally embarrassing *gri
On 24-Nov-2009, at 01:17, Hajdú Zoltán wrote:
> forces them to provide unsubscription options in their advertising messages,
> etc. If there wasnt any unsubscribe option
Sorry, not good enough. The support SPAMMERS who sned messages to addresses
that never subscribed, period.
And the simple
Hi folks,
> >> Unless there are objections, I'm going to add two tests to my sandbox:
> >>
> >> RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM, a new (to us) DNSBL populated by the same source as
> >> the original [N]iXhash zone, with results on intra2net that look quite
> >> promising: 72.98:0.12 spam:ham (PSBL has 48.69:0.3
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:17 +0100, Hajdú Zoltán wrote:
> Habeas (nowdays ReturnPath) certifies their clients, forces them to provide
> unsubscription options in their advertising messages, etc. If
> there wasnt any unsubscribe option then contact their support/abuse team.
> They list many import
Habeas (nowdays ReturnPath) certifies their clients, forces them to provide unsubscription options in their advertising messages, etc. If
there wasnt any unsubscribe option then contact their support/abuse team. They list many important parties who sends transactional messages
and so on, that you
28 matches
Mail list logo
