On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:22 -0800, R-Elists wrote: > didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an > extra factor of protection to continue development?
I'm using it with a locally sourced set of "bad actors". Unfortunately, I don't believe I'm allow to share the data. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
