On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni
giampa...@tomassoni.biz wrote:
No. You also need to teach enough ham and spam tokens to Bayes. By
default, you should train bayes with at least 200 ham messages and 200 spam
messages. At that point, you should start seeing bayes scoring
Been getting a lot of messages form hotmail and others claiming to be from
Blizzard account management or Aeon account services, or a whole host of others.
They are not pegging SA at all, scoring usually close to 0 (they will get
Bayes_00 and sometimes a spamcop hit to balance out, but nothing
whitelist_from_dkim *...@blizzard.com
whitelist_from_dkim *...@battle.net
first dont use wildcard
but as you want can be done like this
blacklist_from f...@example.net
whitelist_from_dkim f...@example.net
if wildcard is needed do def_blacklist_from and def_whitelist_from_dkim
--
xpoint
Hey there,
Perhaps this is by design, but rt replies are, strictly speaking, not
bounce messages.
Message attached, let me know if it looks normal.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site:
On 2010-06-28 11:33, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
Perhaps this is by design, but rt replies are, strictly speaking, not
bounce messages.
Message attached, let me know if it looks normal.
-Dan
from what I see it looks normal if someone really makes an effort to
tune SA
Yes, I do exactly the same - whitelist by dkim (or spf) the domain that
is being abused and then wack all mail from that domain that isn't signed.
On 28/06/10 10:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
whitelist_from_dkim *...@blizzard.com
whitelist_from_dkim *...@battle.net
first dont use wildcard
On Mon 28 Jun 2010 12:37:57 PM CEST, Ned Slider wrote
Why not - that looks fine to me?
its less strong on something that one dont know what is, its still
valid yes, but never shot animals with atom bomps :)
The only real difference I see between whitelist_from_dkim and
LuKreme,
Been getting a lot of messages form hotmail and others claiming to be from
Blizzard account management or Aeon account services, or a whole host of
others.
They are not pegging SA at all, scoring usually close to 0 (they will get
Bayes_00 and sometimes a spamcop hit to balance
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Daniel Lemke wrote:
Hi,
I want to check some mails for their char count (will be part of a meta
rule) but spamassassin does hit the rule, even if the mail has less
chars
than defined in regex.
The regex was tested in Perl and was working
Dan Mahoney, System Admin d...@prime.gushi.org writes:
I previously asked this question and was told the best answer might be
to wait for 3.3.
Was there ever support ratified for ipv6 including proper -A ipv6
access lists, and proper ability to listen on both the ipv6 default
and the v4
The documentation simply says run sa-learn. Does the creation of
the bayes db files effectively enable bayes?
No. You also need to teach enough ham and spam tokens to Bayes. By
default, you should train bayes with at least 200 ham messages and
200 spam
messages. At that point, you
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 16:52 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Can spamc do this, or must it be forked to tee or something.
Ideally I'd like to both report and learn in a single step (such as in a
pipe from alpine). I note that spamassassin -r also has the option to
learn (by
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 18:22 -0700, bongomania wrote:
My email server, squirrelmail, has spamassassin already installed. To
configure, it says to enter the score above which emails should be
quarantined. Unfortunately nowhere on that page, nor in the SA FAQ, nor in
the SA WIKI, nor in a
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 21:34 -0400, Alex wrote:
[...] spamassassin itself only does the scoring -- it's up to another
program, such as amavisd-new (separate application) or spamd (included
with spamassassin) to do something with the email once it has been
determined to be spam.
Nope, spamd
My default config does not appear to be using bayes. How do I enable
it?
use_bayes and bayes_auto_learn are on by default.
I think using the packages on a Ubuntu system they'll default to off.
There could be others that do that.
The documentation simply says run sa-learn. Does
Daniel Lemke wrote:
Hmm, I've just noticed that my rule is working fine for simple text
messages, but is also been triggered when checking mails containing html
(http://pastebin.com/xB7SKnFV).
rawbody T__SHORT_MAIL /\A.{0,150}\z/s
-D reports:
Jun 28 13:32:40.961 [4200] dbg: rules:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 16:52 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Can spamc do this, or must it be forked to tee or something.
Ideally I'd like to both report and learn in a single step (such as in a
pipe from alpine). I note that
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 13:53 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
If you actually can use both options at the same time, I don't know.
Maybe you wanna try it, and let us know. :)
Ah, having spamc talk to netcat just showed it nicely. Both -L
Hi,
[...] spamassassin itself only does the scoring -- it's up to another
program, such as amavisd-new (separate application) or spamd (included
with spamassassin) to do something with the email once it has been
determined to be spam.
Nope, spamd does not do anything with the email either.
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 14:57 -0400, Alex wrote:
Nope, spamd does not do anything with the email either.
Thanks for correcting me. I use amavisd. For those who use spamd, how
do they determine the email destiny based on the score? With just
procmail?
Yes, or any other MDA, probably using
I'm sort of pulling at straws here, but I'm reading the manpage for
sa-learn and it says that sa-learn will try to expire bayes tokens
according to this:
- the number of tokens in the DB is 100,000
- the number of tokens in the DB is bayes_expiry_max_db_size
- there is
I notice that me.com (Apple's mobile me) is now offering a free 60
day trial for their mail solution. About half the mail from me.com has
been spam here lately, so I've added it to my local list of freemail
domains. Anyone seen anything similar?
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP #
On 28-Jun-2010, at 14:41, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
I notice that me.com (Apple's mobile me) is now offering a free 60
day trial
What do you mean, now? They have always offered a 60 day trial.
for their mail solution. About half the mail from me.com has
been spam here lately, so I've added
On 28-Jun-2010, at 04:51, Mark Martinec wrote:
The syntax hasn't changed - the DKIM plugin docs is up-to-date, see there.
perldoc Mail::DKIM was not in anyway helpful.
I assume I am looking in the wrong place?
$ perldoc Mail::SpamAssasin::Plugin::DKIM
No documentation found for
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 15:02 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 28-Jun-2010, at 04:51, Mark Martinec wrote:
The syntax hasn't changed - the DKIM plugin docs is up-to-date, see there.
I assume I am looking in the wrong place?
$ perldoc Mail::SpamAssasin::Plugin::DKIM
No documentation found for
On 28-Jun-2010, at 15:11, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 15:02 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 28-Jun-2010, at 04:51, Mark Martinec wrote:
The syntax hasn't changed - the DKIM plugin docs is up-to-date, see there.
I assume I am looking in the wrong place?
$ perldoc
26 matches
Mail list logo
