Phishing Attack: An Open Letter to the Anti-Spam and Mailbox Operator Community By Matt Blumberg CEO & Chairman, Return Path

2010-11-28 Thread Neil Schwartzman
I’m sure many of you are familiar with the targeted ESP phishing attack that has been ongoing for almost a year now and has led to multiple known ESP system breaches. Return Path was recently a victim of this same attack. So far, we have three blog posts on our client/marketer blog about this –

Re: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Gary V
On 11/28/10, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On søn 28 nov 2010 18:02:36 CET, "Sharma, Ashish" wrote >> Maybe I am a newbie that's why I could not understand what you said. > > man razor-admin > > razor-admin -discover > razor-admin -register > razor-admin -create > > read more examples in man page > > if

RE: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Benny Pedersen
On søn 28 nov 2010 18:02:36 CET, "Sharma, Ashish" wrote Maybe I am a newbie that's why I could not understand what you said. man razor-admin razor-admin -discover razor-admin -register razor-admin -create read more examples in man page if unsure what to do dont do anything, its like postfix

RE: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Sharma, Ashish
Benny, I am unable to understand, can you please explain what you just mentioned. Maybe I am a newbie that's why I could not understand what you said. Thanks Ashish Sharma -Original Message- From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.org] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 10:28 PM To: users@

RE: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Benny Pedersen
On søn 28 nov 2010 17:10:03 CET, "Sharma, Ashish" wrote But what about the Razor2 rules not getting hit? Any suggestions on that? no more then setup account so reporing works -- xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

RE: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Sharma, Ashish
Benny, Thanks for the reply. But what about the Razor2 rules not getting hit? Any suggestions on that? Thanks Ashish Sharma -Original Message- From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:m...@junc.org] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:14 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Difference i

Re: Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Benny Pedersen
On søn 28 nov 2010 12:22:55 CET, "Sharma, Ashish" wrote Can anybody give me some idea of this kind of behavior? its well dokumented that bayes needs training, if no training is done it takes time to autolearn it, ask same question in 90 days and problem might at that time be gone :) if ba

Difference in spam score for seperate email machines with same version of Spamassassin

2010-11-28 Thread Sharma, Ashish
Hi, I have two machines that contain spamassassin. On first machine(this is an old installation, 2-3 months old ), I had installed Spamassassin(3.3.1) from rpmforge repository by using yum (followed http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd) , while on the second I had manually installed Spamassas