Re: Do we need a new SMTP protocol? (OT)

2010-12-03 Thread João Gouveia
- "Marc Perkel" wrote: > I've been thinking about what it would take to actually eliminate spam > > or reduce it to less than 10% of what it is now. One of the problems > is > the SMTP protocol itself. And a big problem with that is that mail > servers talk to each other using the same p

Re: SUBJECT modified with "****SPAM**** LOW *

2010-12-03 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:40 +0100, Peter Test wrote: > There is only one thing I can`t manage... I do NOT want to alter the > email-subject. > SA always alters the subject by prefixing a SPAM LOW (or MEDIUM > or HIGH) * this is also not always the case... only, when the score is > above 5

Re: SUBJECT modified with "****SPAM**** LOW *

2010-12-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 12/3/2010 12:40 PM, Peter Test wrote: > Hi experts, > > i just configured spamassassin and it works quite good. > There is only one thing I can`t manage... I do NOT want to alter the > email-subject. > SA always alters the subject by prefixing a SPAM LOW (or > MEDIUM or HIGH) * > this is

SUBJECT modified with "****SPAM**** LOW *

2010-12-03 Thread Peter Test
Hi experts, i just configured spamassassin and it works quite good. There is only one thing I can`t manage... I do NOT want to alter the email-subject. SA always alters the subject by prefixing a SPAM LOW (or MEDIUM or HIGH) * this is also not always the case... only, when the score is