On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Dave:
Ouch! Right you are about the insertions shown at the top of that page. My
milter-spamc.cf file only contains the "options" which are managed by a
"-option" or "+option". Since you have hacked it, is there any way to turn
off the X-Spam-Level in mi
At 06:29 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
>> At 04:23 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>>>
Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with
issues since recent upgrade of SA
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 04:23 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with
issues since recent upgrade of SA. Downgraded but no help there either, so
went back to latest v
At 04:23 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>
>> Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with
>> issues since recent upgrade of SA. Downgraded but no help there either, so
>> went back to latest version.
>>
>> Am using FBSD-7.x wit
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with
issues since recent upgrade of SA. Downgraded but no help there either, so
went back to latest version.
Am using FBSD-7.x with Sendmail and SA-3.3.1_3
Here is the SA headers in an ema
Warren,
It appears that under 1% of spam is abusing shortening redirectors.
~40% of the shortening redirector spam has local-only spamassassin
scores below the 5 point threshold. We'll see next
Saturday how it scores with all network rules.
Could you please quote the old messages and not p
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110102-r1054364-n/T_URL_SHORTENER/detail
I inserted a giant uri regex into the nightly masscheck in order to get a
rough measure the true extent of the URL shortener problem.
It appears that under 1% of spam is abusing shortening redirectors. ~40% of
the
If I understand that thread correctly, that is for e-mail addresses in body
text?
I'm suggesting looking only at authenticated UID's in headers from specific
providers like Yahoo who are notorious for spam, but their MTA's also send a
significant amount of ham so we cannot DNSBL block them. Given
Here's a wild idea that might prove a point. Create a set of meta rules
which is a combination of every set of two rules.
meta COMBO_RULE1_RULE2 (RULE1 && RULE2)
describe COMBO_RULE1_RULE2 RULE1 and RULE2
score COMBO_RULE1_RULE2 0.1
Then run stats to see if any of the combos produce interestin
Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with
issues since recent upgrade of SA. Downgraded but no help there either, so
went back to latest version.
Am using FBSD-7.x with Sendmail and SA-3.3.1_3
Here is the SA headers in an email tagged as spam but got through anyway:
X-
On 2011-01-02 13:59, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I've been thinking, perhaps we should consider making a "Freemail Realtime
BL" that lists not IP addresses, but rather ID's at the Freemail provider.
Search the list archives for emailbl
1) I am assuming that ID's you see in headers of mail from Y
On søn 02 jan 2011 13:59:22 CET, "Warren Togami Jr." wrote
I've been thinking, perhaps we should consider making a "Freemail Realtime
BL" that lists not IP addresses, but rather ID's at the Freemail provider.
emailbl was better coded for this purpose imho
freemail as is, is perfect as it is n
I've been thinking, perhaps we should consider making a "Freemail Realtime
BL" that lists not IP addresses, but rather ID's at the Freemail provider.
1) I am assuming that ID's you see in headers of mail from Yahoo is always
from an authenticated user?
2) Traps and user reports can quickly list a
On 30/12/10 19:15, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> Lately, I notice we are getting a fair amount (10-12 per day per client)
> of spam coming from freemail users (FREEMAIL_FROM triggers). Usually the
> Subject is non-existent or empty, and the message is always just an URL
I see a fair amount matching t
14 matches
Mail list logo
