Ok, I think its stupid, and don't know what the spammers are trying to
acomplish, except to hope that one of the entries is whtelisted.
But, a from header of:
From: user@domain,com, us...@domain.com, us...@domain.com.. (on to 20
users) is just plain stupid.
It SHOULD be blocked at the MTA,
Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 02:49 +0200, Mikael Syska a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:43 AM, David Touzeau da...@touzeau.eu wrote:
Dear
I would like to increase score according the message size.
Instead blocking it by the MTA i would like spamassassin define it has SPAM
if it
This to manage a quarantine area.
Rejecting the message cause troubles according VIPs that needs to
receive some attached files.
email is not a p2p service, install a bittorrent tracker, and make it
authed to emails sasl users, now the fun starts :)
Anyone know of any legitimate use of multiple email addresses in a from
line?
Yes. I know a few IETF people who do it. Stuff like notes to a working
group from both chairs.
I think I've seen the same multiple-from spam you have. It appears to
confuse Mailman, but that's not postfix's problem.
On 9 Apr 2011 14:29:24 -
John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
Anyone know of any legitimate use of multiple email addresses in a
from line?
Yes. I know a few IETF people who do it. Stuff like notes to a
working group from both chairs.
RFC 5322 does allow multiple addresses in the From:
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This to manage a quarantine area.
Rejecting the message cause troubles according VIPs that needs to
receive some attached files.
email is not a p2p service, install a bittorrent tracker, and make it
authed to emails sasl users, now the fun starts :)
Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 08:59 -0700, John Hardin a écrit :
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This to manage a quarantine area.
Rejecting the message cause troubles according VIPs that needs to
receive some attached files.
email is not a p2p service, install a bittorrent
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, David Touzeau wrote:
Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 08:59 -0700, John Hardin a écrit :
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
This to manage a quarantine area.
Rejecting the message cause troubles according VIPs that needs to
receive some attached files.
So i would like
Hello Jonas,
Am 2011-04-04 17:42:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I am seeing the same thing with my systems. Most spam that makes it
past the filters are from hacked accounts.
I'm not really sure if punishing all the innocent freemail users is
the answer?
It should be relatively easy
Hello dar...@chaosreigns.com,
Am 2011-04-04 12:41:24, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
On 04/04, Benny Pedersen wrote:
freemail_domain hotmail.com
freemail_whitelist ab...@hotmail.com
freemail_whitelist postmas...@hotmail.com
SpamAssassin already has 2,133 domains listed via
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-05 03:29:44, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I'm not sure I understand this bit. From what I see on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host, I already use a smart host, in
that the SMTP server specified in my mail client is not an open relay. Or is
there more to
It seems, ther is a bug in thsis SA rule... because from the header I
see, that I was authenticated and SA see this too, so why it does reject
MY OWN MESSAGE?
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in this rule. So I
guess SpamAssassin doesn't have a way to find out that you were
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:10:39 +0200
David Touzeau da...@touzeau.eu wrote:
Linux community is very good and answering very fast... This is very
good...
But there is only one trouble... When needs to judge about a
technical issue or try to find a political answer, we polluate the
discuss mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
