Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread Kris Deugau
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: On 11/07, Kris Deugau wrote: I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate social networking site, and I have *definitely* received several not-spam reports from customers for some of their emails. How sure are you that those not-spam reports weren't wrong? It fooled me,

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread darxus
On 11/07, Kris Deugau wrote: > I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate social networking site, and I > have *definitely* received several not-spam reports from customers > for some of their emails. How sure are you that those not-spam reports weren't wrong? It fooled me, until I actually talked to t

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread Kris Deugau
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: I'd like to get this added to the default rule set, any objections? header FROM_MYFANBOX From:addr =~ /\@myfanbox\.com$/i score FROM_MYFANBOX 5 I'm pretty sure this is a legitimate social networking site, and I have *definitely* received several not-spam reports

Re: myfanbox.com

2011-11-07 Thread Joseph Brennan
header FROM_MYFANBOX From:addr =~ /\@myfanbox\.com$/i We've blocked 208.69.101/24 at the SMTP level since December 2008 because of user reports about spam. To stay on this long (and this is a very long time) means both that they keep sending and that no one here has ever asked us to allow the

Re: Exit spamassassin when reaching a value

2011-11-07 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 11/5/2011 3:17 PM, Cherubini Enrico wrote: > Good day, > I would like to remove rbl check from postfix and using them in > spamassassin, this because for some users rbl are too aggressive while > for others they aren't enough. It is fairly easy to set up rbls in SA. Check the docs (man Mail::

Re: trusted_networks setup not working

2011-11-07 Thread spamassassin
> Probably hit by a bug in NetAddr::IP, see: > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 > > Upgrade it to NetAddr-IP-4.055 or downgrade to 4.048. Bingo! I upgraded to 4.056 and no more problem! Apparently there'a a workaround, too, mentioned in comment 20 above: 4.05

Re: trusted_networks setup not working

2011-11-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 07.11.11 08:19, spamassas...@horizon.com wrote: For some reason, spamassassin thinks that 0/0 is trusted, even after my most strenuous attempts to dissuade it: $ grep _networks /etc/spamassassin/* /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:# trusted_networks 212.17.35. /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:clear_truste

Re: trusted_networks setup not working

2011-11-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:31:53 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: Upgrade it to NetAddr-IP-4.055 or downgrade to 4.048. latest is 4.056 just cant find the line with 0/0 here :(

Re: trusted_networks setup not working

2011-11-07 Thread Mark Martinec
> For some reason, spamassassin thinks that 0/0 is trusted, even after my > most strenuous attempts to dissuade it: > > $ grep _networks /etc/spamassassin/* > /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:# trusted_networks 212.17.35. > /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:clear_trusted_networks > /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:t

Re: trusted_networks setup not working

2011-11-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 7 Nov 2011 08:19:43 -0500, spamassas...@horizon.com wrote: [snip] The question, of course, is "WTF?" no, what line is 0/0 in ? are you sure that computer is not haveing ipv6 ? :=)

trusted_networks setup not working

2011-11-07 Thread spamassassin
For some reason, spamassassin thinks that 0/0 is trusted, even after my most strenuous attempts to dissuade it: $ grep _networks /etc/spamassassin/* /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:# trusted_networks 212.17.35. /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:clear_trusted_networks /etc/spamassassin/local.cf:trusted_network