Re: razor2 and cloudmark?

2012-01-04 Thread Martin Hepworth
Of course razor2 checks only provide part of the score to SA , have you checked the other rules fired on that email and the nothing else is marking the score down? Martin On Thursday, 5 January 2012, AJ Weber wrote: > > I am testing the Razor2 plugin and am surprised that some "obvious" spam is

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Ned Slider
On 05/01/12 01:28, email builder wrote: What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit? perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5 and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx. If you're

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 1/4/2012 8:41 PM, email builder wrote: H... how did it get like that in the first place? (and how'd you know to check perl-Net-DNS?) The use of packages and extra repositories makes it very difficult to really pinpoint the exact error but the errors you posted pointed more to Net::DNS

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread Noel Butler
Ack, you have far bigger problems then you realise given below... Question, you are smtp-auth'ing via port 587 aren't you? If you are, then your sendmail is incorrectly configured and I suggest you load the news group comp.mail.sendmail and ask there (given that would be OT for the SA list) On W

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread email builder
  What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you > 64-bit? >>> >>>   perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf >>> >> >> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses > perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5 >> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx. >> >> If you're going

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread email builder
>>> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit? >> >> >> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf >> > > You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5 > and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx. > > If you're going to use rpmforge

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread Nick Sayer
Spam detection software, running on the system "quack.kfu.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread email builder
  What does the following show: >>   rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 >>> >>> Oops, I meant: >>> >>> rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 >> >> no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 > > Try rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(IO::Socket::INET6)' - Perl depend

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread Noel Butler
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 12:51 -0800, nsayer wrote: > I'm running a brand new installation of SA 3.3.2 with the Milter on FreeBSD > 8.2. > > Everything is going smoothly, for the most part (there seems to be one > particular spammer who's evading SA, but whatever), but there's one little > thing tha

razor2 and cloudmark?

2012-01-04 Thread AJ Weber
I am testing the Razor2 plugin and am surprised that some "obvious" spam is getting through. The reason I'm most surprised is that the SA install (3.3.1) seems to be checking the message with Razor2 and passing it. However, I have "Cloudmark Desktop One" running on my PC, and when the message ge

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Axb
On 2012-01-04 23:22, Ned Slider wrote: On 04/01/12 21:41, email builder wrote: I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that package, besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not reall

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Ned Slider
On 04/01/12 21:41, email builder wrote: I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that package, besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not really require perl-IO-Socket-INET6 either.

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Ned Slider
On 04/01/12 21:33, email builder wrote: What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit? perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5 and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx. If you're goin

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Kris Deugau
email builder wrote: What does the following show: rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Oops, I meant: rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Try rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(IO::Socket::INET6)' - Perl dependencies in RPM-land are rar

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread nsayer
More info... I've added sid-filter to the mix, and now I'm getting this additional header: Authentication-Results: quack.kfu.com; sender-id=fail (NotPermitted) header.from=nsa...@kfu.com; auth=pass (PLAIN); spf=fail (NotPermitted) smtp.mfrom=nsa...@kfu.com But Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF d

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread nsayer
More info... I've added sid-filter to the mix, and now I'm getting this additional header: Authentication-Results: quack.kfu.com; sender-id=fail (NotPermitted) header.from=nsa...@kfu.com; auth=pass (PLAIN); spf=fail (NotPermitted) smtp.mfrom=nsa...@kfu.com But Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF d

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread email builder
>> What does the following show: >> >> rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 >> > > Oops, I meant: > > rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Woa wait a minute!  Then why this??? yum remove perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror S

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread email builder
> I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that > package, > besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require > perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not really require > perl-IO-Socket-INET6 either. You may be right.  It was sugg

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread email builder
>What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit? perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf I don't use IPv6 that I know of (the errant package is installed whether I like it or not as a dependency of spamassassin).  32 bit. >Also, have you opened a bug with centos or redhat? I've as

SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread nsayer
I'm running a brand new installation of SA 3.3.2 with the Milter on FreeBSD 8.2. Everything is going smoothly, for the most part (there seems to be one particular spammer who's evading SA, but whatever), but there's one little thing that bugs me slightly. I use authenticated SMTP to send e-mail.

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:46:16 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit? in gentoo/funtoo its just perl-cleaner all but it does not handle arch changes Also, have you opened a bug with centos or redhat? if more do this centos would be

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Ned Slider
On 04/01/12 15:30, Ned Slider wrote: What does the following show: rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Oops, I meant: rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Ned Slider
On 04/01/12 07:35, email builder wrote: Anyone have any other insights? Thanks! I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that package, besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not r

Re: sa-update / perl error again

2012-01-04 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit? Also, have you opened a bug with centos or redhat? Try removing/commenting all your cf files especially anything dealing with ip's. Other than that, I would likely update net dns with cpan at least temporarily to see if it fixe