These are the headers
http://pastebin.com/udbDgJ8L
Seems to have come from google , but is spam.
I cant even read the language :)
Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the community for
recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings. We are currently
using:
Barracuda
SpamRats
JunkEmailFilter
SpamEatingMonkey
Plus the standard ones that are checked with SpamAssassin. We are also
On 2012-01-11 12:28, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL
offerings. We are currently using:
Barracuda SpamRats JunkEmailFilter SpamEatingMonkey
Plus the standard ones that are
Am 11.01.2012 12:28, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings.
We are currently using:
Barracuda
SpamRats
JunkEmailFilter
SpamEatingMonkey
never used this
Plus
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having their
adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites. Bayes is being
by-passed due to the content looking valid so it is coming down to the IPs and
domains. Had one yesterday where at 06:39 it was received by one of
On 11/01/12 12:38, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 11.01.2012 12:28, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the
community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings.
We are currently using:
Barracuda
SpamRats
JunkEmailFilter
Am 11.01.2012 12:57, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having their
adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites. Bayes is being
by-passed due to the content looking valid so it is coming down to the IPs
and domains. Had one
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having their
adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites. Bayes is being
by-passed due to the content looking valid so it is coming down to the IPs and
domains. Had one
On 1/11/2012 11:51 AM, Dave Funk wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having
their adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites.
sanesecurity hits many of these.
uri filters can also assist.. surbl, uribl
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Ken A wrote:
On 1/11/2012 11:51 AM, Dave Funk wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
The type of SPAM we are seeing is where legit companies are having
their adverts cloned and the hyperlinks changed to spammy sites.
sanesecurity hits many of these.
uri
On 1/11/2012 5:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not hit
until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
The OP explicitly said that the first spam run was at 06:39 and by
06:42 it was
On 1/11/2012 2:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not hit
until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
The OP explicitly said that the first spam run was at 06:39 and by
06:42 it was
MS == Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com writes:
MS #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
On 1/11/12 9:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
I meant your version of spamassassin.
3.3.2 was updated yesterday.
if you
On 01/12, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS == Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com writes:
MS #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
I don't remember what
MS == Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com writes:
MS On 1/11/12 9:35 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
MS #1 priority: keep your version of sa updated
MS Hmmm, taking a look at it, I find the last update was about 2011/10/24.
MS Too bad sa-update -D doesn't spit out the date.
Am 11.01.2012 23:37, schrieb Rob McEwen:
On 1/11/2012 5:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not hit
until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
The OP explicitly said that the first spam
17 matches
Mail list logo