Re: Help for Channels needed

2012-02-15 Thread Michael Monnerie
Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2012, 08:50:17 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: Right now, I think the error is more basic because that domain name doesn't resolve and that error says it couldn't even retrieve the file to check the gpg signature. ping sa.zmi.at ping: unknown host sa.zmi.at Thanks, but

ANNOUNCE: ZMI_GERMAN available via a new channel

2012-02-15 Thread Michael Monnerie
Starting now, the ZMI_GERMAN ruleset is available via a new channel: # sa-update --channel sa.zmi.at --nogpg You need --nogpg for now as I have no info how to do a gpg setup with it's own key infrastructure to be useful on several servers. The direct download also changed it's location and is

Re: ANNOUNCE: ZMI_GERMAN available via a new channel

2012-02-15 Thread Axb
On 02/15/2012 02:25 PM, Michael Monnerie wrote: Starting now, the ZMI_GERMAN ruleset is available via a new channel: # sa-update --channel sa.zmi.at --nogpg You need --nogpg for now as I have no info how to do a gpg setup with it's own key infrastructure to be useful on several servers. The

Re: Help for Channels needed

2012-02-15 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 2/15/2012 5:03 AM, Michael Monnerie wrote: Thanks, but it must have been a delay in DNS propagation, as I could already resolve that. # ping sa.zmi.at PING sa.zmi.at (212.69.164.60) 56(84) bytes of data. I believe you've got something working only locally. Try it from another network.

Re: ANNOUNCE: ZMI_GERMAN available via a new channel

2012-02-15 Thread Michael Monnerie
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012, 14:30:23 schrieb Axb: sa.zmi.at has no A record Fixed now - thanks. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 signature.asc

Re: Help for Channels needed

2012-02-15 Thread Michael Monnerie
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012, 11:02:40 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: I believe you've got something working only locally. Try it from another network. Perhaps a bind view? Uh, thanks for your test. The glue record got lost on the zmi.at zone. Now it's there. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael

Re: ANNOUNCE: ZMI_GERMAN available via a new channel

2012-02-15 Thread Michael Monnerie
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012, 14:30:23 schrieb Axb: sa.zmi.at has no A record Fixed now - thanks. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 signature.asc Description:

whitelist_from_rcvd when rDNS fails

2012-02-15 Thread Alex
Hi, I need to whitelist a sender, and I typically use whitelist_from_rcvd, but it's not working in this case, and I suspect because rDNS fails: Received: from ideascollide1.ablehost.com (unknown [208.81.177.83]) Is the next best approach to create a rule that deducts points or is there

Re: ANNOUNCE: ZMI_GERMAN available via a new channel

2012-02-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 2012-02-15 14:25, Michael Monnerie skrev: Feedback as always appreciated at spam-ger...@zmi.at domain not found from my ip, bogus acl needs updateing ? temp added forwards in my own bind to at least can send you a email :-)

Re: SPF and DKIM tests by default?

2012-02-15 Thread email builder
Q: Will some rules not fire if some condition exists based on other rules? A: Correct.  There are plenty of rules that build on other rules.  We call these meta rules. OK, but: Q: Are there any default rules as supplied by sa-update that would prevent SPF rules from firing? Q: Any

Some rules I created for suspicious Javascript practices

2012-02-15 Thread neon_overload
Hello, I have created some rules which I have found to be very effective so far at identifying a certain type of spam that spamassassin otherwises cannot detect. Here are the rules: # highly suspicious practices rawbody LOCAL_UNNECESSARY_UNESCAPE

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd when rDNS fails

2012-02-15 Thread Alex
Hi, I need to whitelist a sender, and I typically use whitelist_from_rcvd, but it's not working in this case, and I suspect because rDNS fails:    Received: from ideascollide1.ablehost.com (unknown [208.81.177.83]) Is the next best approach to create a rule that deducts points or is there

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd when rDNS fails

2012-02-15 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:44:09PM -0500, Alex wrote: Hi, I need to whitelist a sender, and I typically use whitelist_from_rcvd, but it's not working in this case, and I suspect because rDNS fails: Received: from ideascollide1.ablehost.com (unknown [208.81.177.83]) Is the next best

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd when rDNS fails

2012-02-15 Thread Henrik K
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:49:15AM +0200, Henrik K wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:44:09PM -0500, Alex wrote: Hi, I need to whitelist a sender, and I typically use whitelist_from_rcvd, but it's not working in this case, and I suspect because rDNS fails: Received: from