On Fri, 10 May 2013 15:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> > Anyway, my main point is this: Don't dismiss a shared Bayes database
> > without supplying evidence that it's a bad idea. :)
> Care to share your database? :)
Ah... hmm. :)
I would be happy to share it with SA developers who might
10.05.2013 19:31, Randal, Phil kirjoitti:
> pyzor and perl-Razor-Agent are in epel.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
Epel is a must, wonder how I forgot it. Now I have it, and those and
running. Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
> Sent: 10 May 2013 17:22
> To:
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 17:49 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Right; pretend you're a salesperson trying to sell an anti-spam product.
> "Oh, you just have to go through your old mailbox and classify a few
> hundred messages by hand... then the system will work great!"
>
> No sale.
Most likely, and
11.05.2013 01:03, John R. Dennison kirjoitti:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:42:21PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> That's strange. Now that I actually try to install it myself, I see
>> the same thing (my home server uses this repo, but I haven't updated
>> in a while). But if you follow the link f
David F. Skoll wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > And would you suggest distributing your well-averaged database to
> > people who install SpamAssassin to as to seed their Bayes?
>
> We have a distribution mechanism built into our software.
>
> > I think having users start with a blank slate and then
On Fri, 10 May 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
Anyway, my main point is this: Don't dismiss a shared Bayes database
without supplying evidence that it's a bad idea. :)
Care to share your database? :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 16:02 -0600, Rick Cone wrote:
> I was curious if somebody out there publishes a Spamassassin Bayes
> SPAM/HAM data base that someone could buy or subscribe to? If so,
> please provide details if known.
Wow, I'm floored.
Reading the last 3 days worth of posts might get you a
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 17:58 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:14:36 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> We (probably) have a much larger sample population, so this tends not
> to be as much of a problem for us.
This thread is about a default Bayes database, suitable for distri-
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 08:57 -0700, psychobyte wrote:
> So i was able to write a plugin that overrides the AWL
> check_from_in_auto_whitelist() eval rule. Thanks for the help Karsten.
You're welcome. Was actually fun digging through the code.
> # awl_ignore_from postmaster mailer-daemon
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:42:21PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> That's strange. Now that I actually try to install it myself, I see
> the same thing (my home server uses this repo, but I haven't updated
> in a while). But if you follow the link for the list of packages on
> the wiki page, it list
Hello,
I was curious if somebody out there publishes a Spamassassin Bayes SPAM/HAM
data base that someone could buy or subscribe to? If so, please provide
details if known.
Thanks,
Rick
On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:14:36 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> I happened to be the lucky recipient of specific spam campaigns in
> languages I do not speak. Campaign referring to quite a few samples
> during a specific, relatively short time period. This definitely
> happened with French, Spani
On Fri, 10 May 2013 15:34:13 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> The weasel words "agrees substantially" is telling. If it isn't 100%
> with no false positives then at least one of those messages does not
> agree. That would be the evidence requested.
> I am not saying that your technique isn't useful.
David F. Skoll wrote:
> Axb wrote:
> > - your HAM is somebody else's SPAM
>
> Do you have evidence for that? The reason I ask is that one of the
> main features of our (commercial) anti-spam solution is a very large
> Bayes database. Once a night, we aggregate all the tokens from votes from
> al
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 15:51 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:32:26 +0200 Axb wrote:
>
> > - your HAM is somebody else's SPAM
>
> Do you have evidence for that?
Evidence... examples, rather.
I happened to be the lucky recipient of specific spam campaigns in
languages I do n
On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:32:26 +0200
Axb wrote:
> - your HAM is somebody else's SPAM
Do you have evidence for that? The reason I ask is that one of the
main features of our (commercial) anti-spam solution is a very large
Bayes database. Once a night, we aggregate all the tokens from votes from
a
You all are keeping me sane and grounded as I deal with the Powers That Be
here trying to set this up. It's good to know that I'm not wrong (I agree
with everything everyone has said, and pointed out from the beginning a
default database would be awful).
And this: "If he insists on starting with
On 5/10/2013 1:09 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
10.05.2013 19:27, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
On 5/10/2013 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be th
10.05.2013 19:27, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
> On 5/10/2013 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
>>
>> But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
>>
>> What would be the best method of get somewhat up to
pyzor and perl-Razor-Agent are in epel.
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
Sent: 10 May 2013 17:22
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: OT: installing on CentOS 6.4
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my di
On 5/10/2013 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be the best method of get somewhat up to date SA to this box?
rpmforge has SA 3.3.2.
http:/
I'm installaling latest CentOS, and would like to have SA in that too.
But to my disappointment, it has only SA 3.1.1 and no Razor nor Pyzor.
What would be the best method of get somewhat up to date SA to this box?
--
You can rent this space for only $5 a week.
signature.asc
Description:
So i was able to write a plugin that overrides the AWL
check_from_in_auto_whitelist() eval rule. Thanks for the help Karsten.
= /etc/spamassassin/25_AwlIgnore.cf
##AWL ignore address types (periods in names are not supported)
## @see AwlIgnore.pm
awl_ignore_from postmaster mailer-d
Thanks for your answer Michael.
Yes you are right, using "sa-learn --sync" as one of the user SA will create
the proper record on the bayes_vars table.
So I guess this is only a problem of having not received enough ham/spam email
with this user.
Matteo
Da: Mi
24 matches
Mail list logo