. . .
>> I find a lot of references, for example, to BAYES_99 in
>> /usr/share/spamassassin/blah.cf. I certainly don't know if these would
>> override the setting in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.
>
> Local settings should override standard settings, so no.
OK. That's what I thought. How
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Bear in mind, that will tell you whether those configuration files are
syntactically correct; that does not tell you anything about whether or
not those are the files the spamd daemon is using.
Take a look at the script that starts spamd. It may ha
On 08/21/2013 03:47 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
I find a few of those 3 link (sudden craving for an IHOP breakfast spams, that
contain mass quantities of non printable text in the body. This causes spamc
to skip them.
Cannot find where to change the message size, tho I must have, as it tells
On 21.08.13 09:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
I find a few of those 3 link (sudden craving for an IHOP breakfast spams,
that contain mass quantities of non printable text in the body. This
causes spamc to skip them.
Cannot find where to change the message size, tho I must have, as it tells
me the l
I find a few of those 3 link (sudden craving for an IHOP breakfast spams, that
contain mass quantities of non printable text in the body. This causes spamc
to skip them.
Cannot find where to change the message size, tho I must have, as it tells me
the limit is 512000 where I understand the de
>
> Bear in mind, that will tell you whether those configuration files are
> syntactically correct; that does not tell you anything about whether or
> not those are the files the spamd daemon is using.
>
> Take a look at the script that starts spamd. It may have a hardcoded path
> to the conf
Am 21.08.2013 11:41, schrieb Per-Erik irt Persson:
> On 08/21/2013 10:22 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 21.08.2013 09:59, schrieb Per-Erik irt Persson:
>>> Or is smtpverification just a path that you don't want to walk down?
>> please read i.e
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_R
On 08/21/2013 10:22 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 21.08.2013 09:59, schrieb Per-Erik irt Persson:
>> Or is smtpverification just a path that you don't want to walk down?
> please read i.e
>
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
>
>
>
> Sender address verification for al
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:37:08 -0400
Joe Sniderman wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 12:35 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> > Hey all -
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anybody know how long the string needs to be to trigger
> > SUBJ_ALL_CAPS? I know it has to be multi-word and over a certain
> > length. Was wondering the s
Am 21.08.2013 09:59, schrieb Per-Erik irt Persson:
> Or is smtpverification just a path that you don't want to walk down?
please read i.e
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
Sender address verification for all email
Unfortunately, sender address verification cannot sim
I have used spamassassin as one of my tools to fight phishing for a while.
Recently this idea which involves smtpverification and logmonitoring
emerged.
Monitoring the syslog for certain phishy tags such as EMAIL_URI_PHISH or
similar and connecting this to a trigger that extracts the senders
email
11 matches
Mail list logo