Hi Guys,
This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services? I do have AS for
SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what consequences it would
cause if I enable or disable the Pop3/imap Anti Spam
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 21:54 -0400, Thomas Harold wrote:
On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca writes:
From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
report_safe 0
Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
ago, and of course, forgot
Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com writes:
On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca writes:
From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
report_safe 0
Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment.
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
see doc for add_header option
--
Matus
Blason rock skrev den 2013-09-15 07:37:
This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services?
show link to a howto else its not a good question
I do have
AS for SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk writes:
On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam
On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
It is, however, a seriously
SA is letting mail thru as ham that should be spam apparently based on
what is too low a score (for my mail) for URIBL_JP_SURBL which was
1.9 by default.
I pushed it up to 4.
But then I see a report that shows a total score of 4.9 when
4.0 is shown for URIBL_JP_SURBL
1.0 is shown for
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk writes:
On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 06:48 +, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Guys,
This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services? I do have AS for
SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what consequences it
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
1) Does it matter that I have autolearn turned off in spamassassin
conf filt 'local.cf' while doing my sandbox work
No, it doesn't. In fact it's probably better that way because SA
won't waste time updating the bayes
I agree an wouldnt harm if I disable it as my smtp scanning is definitely
running fine. What I was thinking about is does imap and pop3 AS scanning
only needed for ISP kindaa environment? Since I do run small setup I know
all my users are trusted and have AV running on their desktops. So they
wont
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 23:27 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
I agree an wouldnt harm if I disable it as my smtp scanning is definitely
running fine. What I was thinking about is does imap and pop3 AS scanning
only needed for ISP kindaa environment? Since I do run small setup I know
all my users are
Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
1) Does it matter that I have autolearn turned off in spamassassin
conf filt 'local.cf' while doing my sandbox work
No, it doesn't. In fact it's probably better that way
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:19:12 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
SA is letting mail thru as ham that should be spam apparently based on
what is too low a score (for my mail) for URIBL_JP_SURBL which was
1.9 by default.
I pushed it up to 4.
But then I see a report that shows a total score of 4.9
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:19:12 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
I assumed it had something to do with rounding or something so I
increased the score to 4.1 to get that message to break the spam level
of 5.
Now the same mail shows a total of 5.1
4.1
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:15:46 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
I had a look into it, and it seems that rounding is handled in an
unusual way. It starts by rounding to the nearest 0.1, and then
subtracts 0.1 if the result is non-spam to avoid the case of:
I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable
of getting it right more than about 40 % or maybe less. Not sure how
to figure that out
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable
of getting it
Hi all,
I wanted to disable few RBLs while doing that I observed that if I
want to just disable spamhaus, I've to actually disable
__RCVD_IN_ZEN after disabling the other spamhaus related checks like
check_rbl_sub..
How do I know that __RCVD_IN_ZEN is related to a check like
RCVD_IN_SBL? I
23 matches
Mail list logo
