Re: Bayes training via inotify (incron)

2014-08-22 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of August 23, 2014 3:22:13 AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann is alleged to have said: On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:32 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: Isn't inotify a bit of overkill for this? If you have a dedicated maildir for training, you know that anything in maildir/new is, uh, new. So you pro

Re: Bayes training via inotify (incron)

2014-08-22 Thread Eric Wong
Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Eric Wong wrote: > > Eric> I always thought inotify was an obvious way to train for anybody > Eric> using Maildirs on Linux, so I set it up for my server and > Eric> basically forgot about it since it worked well. Fast forward to > Eric> 2014 and I realize what I do is no

Re: Learning both spam and ham, edge case

2014-08-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:44 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I know that if you misclassify a mail as spam with > > sa-learn --spam /path/to/ham > > you can later run > > sa-learn --ham /path/to/ham > > to correct the mistake, and SA will do the right thing (ie. forget the > wrong classification

Re: Bayes training via inotify (incron)

2014-08-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:32 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Isn't inotify a bit of overkill for this? If you have a dedicated > maildir for training, you know that anything in maildir/new is, uh, > new. So you process it and move it to maildir/cur. What am I missing? The new/ directory is for del

Learning both spam and ham, edge case

2014-08-22 Thread Ian Zimmerman
I know that if you misclassify a mail as spam with sa-learn --spam /path/to/ham you can later run sa-learn --ham /path/to/ham to correct the mistake, and SA will do the right thing (ie. forget the wrong classification). And conversely, with ham <-> spam. My question is, what happens if you

Re: Bayes training via inotify (incron)

2014-08-22 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:34:34 +, Eric Wong wrote: Eric> I always thought inotify was an obvious way to train for anybody Eric> using Maildirs on Linux, so I set it up for my server and Eric> basically forgot about it since it worked well. Fast forward to Eric> 2014 and I realize what I do is

Re: DNS resolves to localhost

2014-08-22 Thread Noel
On 8/22/2014 2:55 PM, Kevin Miller wrote: > I was looking at the output from logdigest on my egress mail server > (smtp.ci.juneau.ak.us) and came across these: > > System Error Messages: > aboutres.net. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?): 1 > Time(s) > flylib.net. config

RE: FW: Tons of spam getting through

2014-08-22 Thread Greg Ledford
>Changed and Amavis has been restarted. I’ll check the headers on the next >piece of spam to come through. Thanks I’m still trying to figure out how illegitimate stuff like this is getting through. It’s obviously a virus (which was caught) but then why did the email get through? I see the flag

Re: DNS resolves to localhost

2014-08-22 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/22/2014 3:55 PM, Kevin Miller wrote: I was looking at the output from logdigest on my egress mail server (smtp.ci.juneau.ak.us) and came across these: System Error Messages: aboutres.net. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?): 1 Time(s) flylib.net. config error: ma

DNS resolves to localhost

2014-08-22 Thread Kevin Miller
I was looking at the output from logdigest on my egress mail server (smtp.ci.juneau.ak.us) and came across these: System Error Messages: aboutres.net. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?): 1 Time(s) flylib.net. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?): 1 Time(s)

Bayes training via inotify (incron)

2014-08-22 Thread Eric Wong
Hi all, I'm a happy SA user since around 2004/2005. Since 2008, I've been using Linux inotify (via incron) to do automatic Bayes training. Previously I did something similar using: find ... | spamc -L ... via cron. I also used to run several filters with SA (crm114+dspam), but since 200