Hi
for some mailing-lists a more_spam_from would make
sense instead whitelist a sender- is there a rule i
don't see or has somebody a working one for local.cf?
honestly i would like to have 4 options depending
on sender or RCPT
* more_spam (-2)
* most_spam (-4)
* lot_of_spam (-6)
* all_spam
On 09/17/2014 10:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
for some mailing-lists a more_spam_from would make
sense instead whitelist a sender- is there a rule i
don't see or has somebody a working one for local.cf?
honestly i would like to have 4 options depending
on sender or RCPT
* more_spam (-2)
*
Am 17.09.2014 um 11:31 schrieb Axb:
On 09/17/2014 10:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
for some mailing-lists a more_spam_from would make
sense instead whitelist a sender- is there a rule i
don't see or has somebody a working one for local.cf?
honestly i would like to have 4 options
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for
both - FROM and TO just because it makes sense to handle
some mailing lists different without whitelist them completly
and the same for different RCPT, one user is living in asia
Am 17.09.2014 um 14:43 schrieb RW:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for
both - FROM and TO just because it makes sense to handle
some mailing lists different without whitelist them completly
and the same for
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 14:54 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.09.2014 um 14:43 schrieb RW:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for
both - FROM and TO just because it makes sense to handle
some mailing lists
Am 17.09.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Jesse Norell:
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 14:54 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.09.2014 um 14:43 schrieb RW:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for
both - FROM and TO just because it makes
On 09/17/2014 04:27 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:
snip
Just a thought - maybe a config setting to not do automatic bayes
training for a give from/to addr would be more appropriate? Say a meta
rule (more a flag but I don't know enough SA rules to know if those
exist) that you set in your own
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 16:47 +0200, Axb wrote:
On 09/17/2014 04:27 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:
snip
Just a thought - maybe a config setting to not do automatic bayes
training for a give from/to addr would be more appropriate? Say a meta
rule (more a flag but I don't know enough SA rules
Am 17.09.2014 um 16:47 schrieb Axb:
On 09/17/2014 04:27 PM, Jesse Norell wrote:
snip
Just a thought - maybe a config setting to not do automatic bayes
training for a give from/to addr would be more appropriate? Say a meta
rule (more a flag but I don't know enough SA rules to know if
What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
more intelligent is needed.
--
jarif.bit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 17.09.2014 um 21:10 schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
more intelligent is needed
have you considered how to reduce the amount making it
to SA at all? 3
On 09/17/2014 09:10 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
more intelligent is needed.
LVS
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:24:10 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
please read my previous message
what i asked is careful considered and exactly what i need
even if you could reach something similar with other ways
because the admin backend needs to be understood by other
persons too and finaly
14 matches
Mail list logo
