more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Hi for some mailing-lists a more_spam_from would make sense instead whitelist a sender- is there a rule i don't see or has somebody a working one for local.cf? honestly i would like to have 4 options depending on sender or RCPT * more_spam (-2) * most_spam (-4) * lot_of_spam (-6) * all_spam

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Axb
On 09/17/2014 10:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi for some mailing-lists a more_spam_from would make sense instead whitelist a sender- is there a rule i don't see or has somebody a working one for local.cf? honestly i would like to have 4 options depending on sender or RCPT * more_spam (-2) *

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.09.2014 um 11:31 schrieb Axb: On 09/17/2014 10:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi for some mailing-lists a more_spam_from would make sense instead whitelist a sender- is there a rule i don't see or has somebody a working one for local.cf? honestly i would like to have 4 options

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread RW
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for both - FROM and TO just because it makes sense to handle some mailing lists different without whitelist them completly and the same for different RCPT, one user is living in asia

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.09.2014 um 14:43 schrieb RW: On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for both - FROM and TO just because it makes sense to handle some mailing lists different without whitelist them completly and the same for

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Jesse Norell
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 14:54 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 17.09.2014 um 14:43 schrieb RW: On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for both - FROM and TO just because it makes sense to handle some mailing lists

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.09.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Jesse Norell: On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 14:54 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 17.09.2014 um 14:43 schrieb RW: On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:50:43 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: what i want to achieve is 4 levels of negative score for both - FROM and TO just because it makes

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Axb
On 09/17/2014 04:27 PM, Jesse Norell wrote: snip Just a thought - maybe a config setting to not do automatic bayes training for a give from/to addr would be more appropriate? Say a meta rule (more a flag but I don't know enough SA rules to know if those exist) that you set in your own

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Jesse Norell
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 16:47 +0200, Axb wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:27 PM, Jesse Norell wrote: snip Just a thought - maybe a config setting to not do automatic bayes training for a give from/to addr would be more appropriate? Say a meta rule (more a flag but I don't know enough SA rules

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.09.2014 um 16:47 schrieb Axb: On 09/17/2014 04:27 PM, Jesse Norell wrote: snip Just a thought - maybe a config setting to not do automatic bayes training for a give from/to addr would be more appropriate? Say a meta rule (more a flag but I don't know enough SA rules to know if

Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-17 Thread Jari Fredriksson
What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit* more intelligent is needed. -- jarif.bit signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.09.2014 um 21:10 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit* more intelligent is needed have you considered how to reduce the amount making it to SA at all? 3

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-17 Thread Axb
On 09/17/2014 09:10 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit* more intelligent is needed. LVS

Re: more_spam_from like more_spam_to

2014-09-17 Thread RW
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:24:10 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: please read my previous message what i asked is careful considered and exactly what i need even if you could reach something similar with other ways because the admin backend needs to be understood by other persons too and finaly