A little more background on all of this is that both verizon and microsoft
had earlier blacklisted shellworld.net on a domain basis as a result of
the high volume of spam being forged by several addresses on that domain
mine wasn't the only address that was targeted on shellworld.net and I
On 3/30/2015 10:12 AM, grhoderick wrote:
First, apologies in advance, I know this list is for seasoned users. I'm a
consumer—not an administrator by any means—but posting here in hopes that
the SA focus of the list will provide a clear answer.
It's not just for seasoned users but not sure we can
Hi,
I'm guessing that TO_IN_SUBJ only pops when the Subject: contains the
full email address in To:, not just the user part... is that right? I've been
getting a bunch of spam (some of which ends up as FNs) with just the username
portion of To: in the Subject line. This is almost
Hi, I wasn't and am not the admin of shellworld.net and don't know if the
domain got set up with an spf record or not. I know one thing for sure,
before I try setting up my own domain, I'll be back here and ask a few
questions. For screen reader accessibility I've heard good things about
On 3/31/2015 12:12 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:59:39AM -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
Is it possible to enable or disable RBL and/or SPF checks according to
the existence or lack of a header?
Without going into too many details, I need a way of transmitting to
On 3/31/2015 12:23 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:15:31PM -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
Here's an example from when Yahoo's internal Received headers were
hitting RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP, taken from here:
http://www.pccc.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/KAM.cf
header
On 3/31/2015 11:45 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Is it possible to enable or disable RBL and/or SPF checks according to
the existence or lack of a header?
Without going into too many details, I need a way of transmitting to
SpamAssassin at scan-time that it should not run SPF or RBL checks on
a
* on the Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:15:31PM -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
You can fairly easily write a meta that reverses the score of each RBL
and SPF rule if your condition fires.
Any chance you could point me to an example of how to do this?
Here's an example from when Yahoo's internal Received
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Is it possible to enable or disable RBL and/or SPF checks according to
the existence or lack of a header?
Without going into too many details, I need a way of transmitting to
SpamAssassin at scan-time that it should not run SPF or RBL checks on
a
Is it possible to enable or disable RBL and/or SPF checks according to
the existence or lack of a header?
Without going into too many details, I need a way of transmitting to
SpamAssassin at scan-time that it should not run SPF or RBL checks on
a particular message, which isn't based on a
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 10:28 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Hi, I wasn't and am not the admin of shellworld.net and don't know if the
domain got set up with an spf record or not.
Yes, it has SPF set up. I used this to see it:
http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html
The first test on the page
* on the Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:59:39AM -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
Is it possible to enable or disable RBL and/or SPF checks according to
the existence or lack of a header?
Without going into too many details, I need a way of transmitting to
SpamAssassin at scan-time that it should not run
On 3/31/2015 2:21 PM, grhoderick wrote:
All — thanks so much for your time. Regarding your questions, I'll do my best
to answer given my inexperience with SA.
Ahh, so you are using lunarpages. I've been working with Lunarpages and
they use cpanel. Overall, I think that type of installation is
From: Joe Quinn jqu...@pccc.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 11:44 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RBL/SPF if header exists
On 3/31/2015 12:23 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:15:31PM -0400, Joe Quinn wrote:
Here's an example from when Yahoo's
All — thanks so much for your time. Regarding your questions, I'll do my best
to answer given my inexperience with SA.
Kevin A. McGrail wrote
We need more headers to see. What version of SpamAssassin does the
headers show? What rules does it show it hits when it does hit?
Here's raw
15 matches
Mail list logo
