Quite clearly they're capitol spaces! ;-)
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500
Registered Linux User No: 307357
-Original Message-
From: Niamh Holding
That sounds like a capital idea!
But, but, but, when did those spaces become a building?
(runs for cover... ;)
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Kevin Miller wrote:
Quite clearly they're capitol spaces! ;-)
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Are you starting spamd before your networking and local dns are started?
Regards,
KAM
On April 22, 2015 8:44:59 PM EDT, Thom Miller t...@cagroups.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:16:40 -0700
Michael Williamson michael.h.william...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have another question.
It appears
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:16:40 -0700
Michael Williamson michael.h.william...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have another question.
It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores
for the same email.
In particular, I have noticed that points are omitted for
RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:23:22 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
Are you starting spamd before your networking and local dns are
started? Regards,
KAM
No. spamd is started after the network is up and running.
According to
Ok Thanks for the answer :)
Marco
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:58:15 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 4/17/2015 6:46 AM, ma...@nucleus.it wrote:
Hi to all,
a saw that from spamassassin 3.4 Bayes can be stored on a Redis
database.
Is it possible also for Awl
uhm why - there is at least one lowercase char
Subject: Re: HOTEL RESERVATION.
* 1.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello
uhm why - there is at least one lowercase char
Subject: Re: HOTEL RESERVATION.
* 1.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test.
Look in
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 8:47:48 AM, you wrote:
AM Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test.
Quite right too, mind the next complain will be that it isn't all caps
because of the spaces...
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
Mark Martinec skrev den 2015-04-22 02:17:
... although there's a funny twist there. Some of these illegal
IP addresses are not really a claimed-to-be IP address of a mailer,
but come from an embedded e-mail address in a comment:
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost)
Am 22.04.2015 um 10:14 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 8:47:48 AM, you wrote:
AM Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test.
Quite right too, mind the next complain will be that it isn't all caps
because of the spaces...
don't confuse questions with
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error
during SPF processing of domain of m...@junc.eu)
my fault ?
v=spf1 mx -all
is imho valid record
nOn 20.04.15 09:08, @lbutlr wrote:
Bronto.com is a remailer service for various companies (like Fractureme.com
and others) and I’ve been noting that it hits some odd triggers in
spamass-milter:
Apr 19 15:00:40 mail spamd[87225]: spamd: result: Y 5 -
On 21.04.15 18:49, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I just wanted to give a thank you to everyone who responded to this
thread. I clearly misunderstood what DCC does, and it now has little
value to me as a scoring item.
I recommend you putting mass senders to whitelist. It's perfect scoring item
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:32 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error
during SPF processing of domain of m...@junc.eu)
my fault ?
v=spf1 mx -all
is imho valid record
The Kitterman SPF testing tool at
Am 22.04.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 21.04.15 18:49, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I just wanted to give a thank you to everyone who responded to this
thread. I clearly misunderstood what DCC does, and it now has little
value to me as a scoring item.
I recommend you putting
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2015-04-22 12:48:
The Kitterman SPF testing tool at
http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html
says the junc.eu SPF record is fine, but has lists of IPV4 and IPV6 IPs
and no 'mx' in it. Has the record changed?
yes i just have changed it now, but i see apache.org
On 21.04.15 18:49, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I just wanted to give a thank you to everyone who responded to this
thread. I clearly misunderstood what DCC does, and it now has little
value to me as a scoring item.
Am 22.04.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
I recommend you putting
On 4/21/2015 11:48 PM, David B Funk wrote:
I've got some home-grown rules that I trust to which have added
tflags autolearn_force
Recently I've seen some spam that hit those rules and racked up enough
points that they should have auto-learned. But the scoring analysis
explicitly says
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:48:46 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk wrote:
is the autolearn_force being ignored because of the initial BAYES_00
score?
Yes, a Bayes point in the opposite direction prevents auto-training.
All the force flag does is override the 3+3 rule.
Is there a
Hi Quanah,
On 22/04/15 02:52, [*] Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:05 PM +0100 Steve Freegard
s...@fsl.com wrote:
Just because *you* can't find any sense in it; others might be able to.
For example:
meta __FSL_ANY_BULK ((DCC_CHECK || RAZOR2_CHECK ||
Am 22.04.2015 um 10:32 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error
during SPF processing of domain of m...@junc.eu)
my fault ?
v=spf1 mx -all
is imho valid record
what did you not understand in temporary error?
it just could not be resolved
22 matches
Mail list logo
