On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
(2) Check the HELO the other guy sends and reject if it's not a FQDN
(i.e. it's not got any periods at all). This probably shouldn't be done
on mail originating locally, but for mail coming in from the Internet the
other MTA should always be send
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:36 AM, David Jones wrote:
>>>On 08.06.15 23:03, Michael B Allen wrote:
>>>So I have had SA running for about 2 days on a very small site with a
>>>handful of users. I've been running the default config just to see how
>>>well it would do by itself. Unfortunately quite a lo
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:35:18 +0200
Axb wrote:
>
> suggest you provide a dedicated redisawl.pre including loadplugin
> command
>
> init.pre can be overwritten by an upgrade
That's not supposed to happen.
On 6/9/2015 4:25 PM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:16:00 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets
TO_
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:16:00 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
> >> TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
> >> Can one please explain to me why message A gets
> >> TO_NO_BRKTS
On 09.06.2015 17:57, Benning, Markus wrote:
Hello,
i want to announce the release of the SpamAssassin Plugins:
RedisAWL - redis support for spamassassin AWL/TxRep
RuleTimingRedis - collect SA rule timings in redis
Both can be downloaded from CPAN or GitHub:
https://metacpan.org/author/BENNING
On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:51 PM, RW wrote:
> Bogofilter is pretty easy to use without a plugin. Typically it's just
> a matter of piping your mail through bogofilter -e -p
> In general the most efficient way to score-in an external filter is to
> run it separately and have SA score the result - by s
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
(2) Check the HELO the other guy sends and reject if it's not a FQDN
(i.e. it's not got any periods at all). This probably shouldn't be done
on mail originating locally, but for mail coming in from the Inte
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 09.06.15 11:29, John Hardin wrote:
Two things that I have found very useful at the MTA level are:
(1) Delay sending your SMTP banner a second or two and reject any sender
that starts sending information before that. This is a built-in optio
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:36:58 +
David Jones wrote:
> I also have added CRM114 and BOGOFILTER plugins which are similar to
> BAYES but don't require the manual training.
They need manual training to the same extent that Bayes needs it.
> These are fairly difficult to install
Bogofilter is
On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> (2) Check the HELO the other guy sends and reject if it's not a FQDN (i.e.
> it's not got any periods at all). This probably shouldn't be done on mail
> originating locally, but for mail coming in from the Internet the other MTA
> should always
On 09.06.15 11:29, John Hardin wrote:
Two things that I have found very useful at the MTA level are:
(1) Delay sending your SMTP banner a second or two and reject any
sender that starts sending information before that. This is a
built-in option in Sendmail, google "greet_pause".
even 15...
Am 09.06.2015 um 20:29 schrieb John Hardin:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, David Jones wrote:
Some of the best and easiest things you can enable to block spam are
outside of SpamAssassin at your MTA (sendmail, postfix, etc.).
- Enable greylisting. This is just about the only way you can block
zero-
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, David Jones wrote:
Some of the best and easiest things you can enable to block spam are
outside of SpamAssassin at your MTA (sendmail, postfix, etc.).
- Enable greylisting. This is just about the only way you can block
zero-hour spam from compromised accounts that come
Hello,
i want to announce the release of the SpamAssassin Plugins:
RedisAWL - redis support for spamassassin AWL/TxRep
RuleTimingRedis - collect SA rule timings in redis
Both can be downloaded from CPAN or GitHub:
https://metacpan.org/author/BENNING
https://github.com/benningm
Timings gather
Am 09.06.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Alex Regan:
My top hit counts from last week from dnsblcount.pl script (using
postscreen so the numbers are most likely skewed based on ordering and
thresholds being met with multiple RBL hits):
Where did you find dnsblcount.pl? Or is this is your own? T
Hi,
My top hit counts from last week from dnsblcount.pl script (using
postscreen so the numbers are most likely skewed based on ordering and
thresholds being met with multiple RBL hits):
Where did you find dnsblcount.pl? Or is this is your own? That sounds
like a great compliment to
Am 09.06.2015 um 15:55 schrieb Reindl
Harald:
Am 09.06.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Martin Fernau:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On
with
TO_NO_BRKTS
Am 09.06.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Kevin A.
McGrail:
On
6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On
with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY h
On 6/9/2015 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
HTML_ONLY means what it says - no plaintext a
On 6/9/2015 9:49 AM, Martin Fernau wrote:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
Message A:
Content-Type: multipart
Am 09.06.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Martin Fernau:
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
HTML_ONLY means what it says - n
Hello!
I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without.
Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
and why message B didn't?
Message A:
--cut
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: martin.fer...@venus.esw.cps-net.d
>>On 08.06.15 23:03, Michael B Allen wrote:
>>So I have had SA running for about 2 days on a very small site with a
>>handful of users. I've been running the default config just to see how
>>well it would do by itself. Unfortunately quite a lot of spam is
>>getting through. So far 40 of 142 spams h
On 08.06.15 23:03, Michael B Allen wrote:
So I have had SA running for about 2 days on a very small site with a
handful of users. I've been running the default config just to see how
well it would do by itself. Unfortunately quite a lot of spam is
getting through. So far 40 of 142 spams have pass
25 matches
Mail list logo
